KVR Audio

brok landers · Post by **brok landers** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:34 pm

djanthonyw wrote:
Liquidclear wrote:
headquest wrote:There Is No Best.
You must not be familiar with Babya's line of Pro-Audio software then.
Didn't Timbaland use it for his latest album?

at least it sounded like it ...

Dean Aka Nekro · Post by **Dean Aka Nekro** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:36 pm

Cubase was Never There And It Never Existed

VST 3? what the f**k is wrong with VST 2.4 or whatever?

NuENDo it all

steinberg = Fail

or did i miss a trick?

buscemi · Post by **buscemi** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:43 pm

NEKRO.MACHINE wrote: steinberg = Fail

Steinberg has been and will likely be around far longer than the "fail" meme. They've succeeded in being the right workflow for some, not for others. Same with Reaper and any other audio software.

Meffy · Post by **Meffy** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:55 pm

djanthonyw wrote:
Liquidclear wrote:
headquest wrote:There Is No Best.
You must not be familiar with Babya's line of Pro-Audio software then.
Didn't Timbaland use it for his latest album?

Yes, except since joining in a collaboration with Babya he's no longer called Timbaland. His latest release joins a long line of Babyafied classics.

And now...

Dean Aka Nekro · Post by **Dean Aka Nekro** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:04 pm

yeah i am aware of that fact its just i never got on well with any of their DAW's/Sequencer's myself. So i was just getting it off my virtual chest

although i have nothing against Steinberg at all and respect the fact that they have given us or paved the way for alot of modern digital recording technology. so it was a personal venting not a bashing. If really i f**king hate something i tend to keep it to myself as who the f**k cares what i think

buscemi · Post by **buscemi** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:11 pm

Gotcha. Unfortunately Cubase got on well with me even though my official education and early experience was on tape and/or with Pro Tools. I don't mind Pro Tools either, but I work better in Cubase so that's what I use. I definitely want to try Reaper for Mac when it is out of beta though.

Edit - that was far too civil an exchange for a host and O.S. war thread so - f**k you.

spitboxer · Post by **spitboxer** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:12 pm

How about video support in Reaper?

Stupid American Pig · Post by **Stupid American Pig** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:17 pm

Reaper ass rapes the competition...

djanthonyw · Post by **djanthonyw** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:19 pm

Yes, I always thought Reaper was gay.

Stupid American Pig wrote:Reaper ass rapes the competition...

fandango · Post by **fandango** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:22 pm

Stupid American Pig wrote:Reaper ass rapes the competition...

"I bet Reaper's the kinda DAW that would f**k a person in the ass and not have the goddamn common courtesy to give them a reach-around!"

Dean Aka Nekro · Post by **Dean Aka Nekro** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:33 pm

buscemi: i love it as im a Pro Tools man through and through (with Live and Renoise on the side!)

fandango quoting the best on screen performance ever in my eyes - i love that shit even more

ing with laughter

SadPuppyBlues · Post by **SadPuppyBlues** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:13 pm

While I really don't see it beating out any commercial DAW, Reaper is probably one of the best freeware options for the time being.

djanthonyw · Post by **djanthonyw** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:17 pm

SadPuppyBlues wrote:Reaper is probably one of the best freeware options for the time being.

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:29 pm

djanthonyw wrote:
SadPuppyBlues wrote:Reaper is probably one of the best freeware options for the time being.

but is the lol for the fact that it actually costs, or that the mac version has been in perpetual beta?

djanthonyw · Post by **djanthonyw** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:31 pm

When I posted, cost. Now that you pointed out the perpetual beta, both.

Cubase is Dead