Interesting approach. I'm looking forward to trying it out.GlennO wrote: Instead of patch randomization, we went that kind of thing at the level of individual components.
Omnisphere - will it be worth the hype ?
-
- KVRAF
- 2875 posts since 28 Jan, 2004 from Da Nang, Vietnam
-
- KVRist
- 290 posts since 2 Aug, 2007
These envelopes sound really interesting. Eric mentioned earlier that he's yet to find the limit of nodes that can be created.GlennO wrote:Instead of patch randomization, we went that kind of thing at the level of individual components. So, for example, you can add chaos to modulation or looping envelopes. That has the advantage of real-time control so you can get those unpredictable surprises as you're playing. Or, you can simply generate new envelopes until you hear something you like, and then save that as a patch.kuniklo wrote:I wonder if there's going to be any kind of patch randomizer in Omnisphere. I find them very useful in other synths.
- Glenn
Also, it's been suggested that they are capable of recursive style functions and animation.
Can you elaborate on the design goals and capabilities of the envelope?
Last edited by ehdyn on Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- 277 posts since 25 Apr, 2002
I can say this much at this point:ehdyn wrote:
These envelopes sound really interesting. Eric mentioned earlier that he's yet to find the limit of nodes that can be created.
Also, it's been suggested that these are capable of recursive style functions and animation.
Can you elaborate on the design goals and capabilities of these?
Multipoint envelopes have always been extraordinarily useful in synths. However, they've traditionally been rather tedious to program. Our goal with the envelopes in Omnisphere was to offer the expressive power of multipoint envelopes while making them easy, and even fun, to work with. You even can do cool things with them without getting into the details of patch programming.
If you do want to delve into the depths of patch programming you'll find lots of neat features. Just two examples are: a wide variety of stage shapes and modulatable playback speed.
- Glenn
- KVRAF
- 11373 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
What about one envelope modulating the attack or decay of another envelope? Especially the Virus uses this trick of modulating it's own attack/decay to create interesting non-linear envelope shapes.
Cheers!
bManic
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
-
- KVRist
- 277 posts since 25 Apr, 2002
Sure, you can do that. But, if it's interesting shapes you're after, you don't have to resort to tricks like that. There are much simpler and more flexible ways to get sophisticated envelope shapes in Omnisphere.bmanic wrote:What about one envelope modulating the attack or decay of another envelope? Especially the Virus uses this trick of modulating it's own attack/decay to create interesting non-linear envelope shapes.
- Glenn
- KVRAF
- 12190 posts since 7 Sep, 2006 from Roseville, CA
Alright, that's it. Just stop all this talk about Omnisphere right now! Some of us have work to do and you're making very difficult for me to focus. Arrrggghhh!!!!!
(
)
Logic Pro | LUNA Pro | OB-X8 | Prophet 6 | OB-6 | Rev2 | TEO-5 | Pro 3 | SE-1X | Minitaur | Deepmind 12D | Integra-7 | TR-1000 | Analog RYTM mk2 | Digitakt 2 | TD-3 MO | TD-3 | Maschine+
-
- KVRAF
- 2875 posts since 28 Jan, 2004 from Da Nang, Vietnam
It sounds like a very well-specced instrument, but so far all the sounds I've heard out of it have that glossy, polished hi-verb sheen that turned me off to their other instruments. I know there's a lot of demand for these kinds of sounds but I'd like to hear some sounds that illustrate the raw quality of the components and samples without a lot of effects.
The impOSCar filter should be excellent, of course, but I'm still not clear on what the synth oscs sound like or what kinds of manipulations are available with the samples. I'd just wait for a demo version and figure this out for myself but I'm assuming that, like their other plugs, there won't be demo versions.
The impOSCar filter should be excellent, of course, but I'm still not clear on what the synth oscs sound like or what kinds of manipulations are available with the samples. I'd just wait for a demo version and figure this out for myself but I'm assuming that, like their other plugs, there won't be demo versions.
-
- KVRist
- 367 posts since 18 Dec, 2006
i think they might neeed to add a warning to this synthcryophonik wrote:Alright, that's it. Just stop all this talk about Omnisphere right now! Some of us have work to do and you're making very difficult for me to focus. Arrrggghhh!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
(
)
it may cause you to become unproductive in other areas of life apart from soundesign and ambient noodling
or potentially may revitalize your love of synths and electronic music
-
- KVRian
- 816 posts since 4 Sep, 2007 from Los Angeles
That is a good point the rawness of impOSCar is very apparent but i havent heard that many raw samples from Omnisphere. God i hope its worth the wait im sure its gonna sound awesome but what will i do with it...?kuniklo wrote:It sounds like a very well-specced instrument, but so far all the sounds I've heard out of it have that glossy, polished hi-verb sheen that turned me off to their other instruments. I know there's a lot of demand for these kinds of sounds but I'd like to hear some sounds that illustrate the raw quality of the components and samples without a lot of effects.
The impOSCar filter should be excellent, of course, but I'm still not clear on what the synth oscs sound like or what kinds of manipulations are available with the samples. I'd just wait for a demo version and figure this out for myself but I'm assuming that, like their other plugs, there won't be demo versions.
- KVRAF
- 11373 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
But modulating an envelope attack or decay would make it dynamic, not a static shape, so I'm glad to hear this possibility is included!GlennO wrote:Sure, you can do that. But, if it's interesting shapes you're after, you don't have to resort to tricks like that. There are much simpler and more flexible ways to get sophisticated envelope shapes in Omnisphere.bmanic wrote:What about one envelope modulating the attack or decay of another envelope? Especially the Virus uses this trick of modulating it's own attack/decay to create interesting non-linear envelope shapes.
- Glenn
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
-
any1particular any1particular https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=175870
- KVRian
- 988 posts since 12 Mar, 2008 from Detriot Michigan USA
As an owner of Atmosphere, Trilogy and Stylus RMX (what a whore!), I am most definitely counting the minutes till the highly esteemed and venerable Omnisphere is released!!!!!!!basic channel wrote:As an owner (and lover) of Atmosphere & Stylus RMX, I do rate Spectrasonics stuff.
But the hype around Omnisphere (mainly from Spectrasonics themselves) is pretty intense.
How many around here are suitably impressed & planning to purchase ?
As an Atmosphere user, I'll probably upgrade if the price is acceptable (to add another huge piece of software to my collection which needs to be learnt)
BC
Or am I talking about the Dali Lama?
OOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMM
-
- KVRAF
- 2973 posts since 18 Oct, 2004
We need Omnisphere before black holes or strangelets devour earth. cmon guys push up the release date. 
-
- KVRian
- 816 posts since 4 Sep, 2007 from Los Angeles
alright everyone time for a break


-
- KVRian
- 816 posts since 4 Sep, 2007 from Los Angeles
sorry bout the xtra zero i didnt see it cuz i was... well... you know...
-
Hewitt Huntwork Hewitt Huntwork https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=7460
- KVRAF
- 1645 posts since 2 Jun, 2003
I've waited eagerly for the release of virtual instruments before, and it seems to me that the reactions here are fairly typical of any highly anticipated release. You get rampant and curious speculators, haters, and fanboy defenders (into which category I would most likely fall
). What is atypical, of course, is the developer seeing each criticism leveled at his instrument as an opportunity to discuss it in a positive way. The devs who do this unfailingly are few and far between and I don't mind telling you that the ones who possess this positive characteristic - coincidentally - make the instruments that are the most useful to me. I deliberately phrased that in subjective terms, YMMV.
When I was building my first serious workstation, I knew that I would use lots of production-ready sounds. At that time I had been curious about Atmosphere since its release, and I'm embarrassed to admit that when RMX came out I didn't understand what it was capable of well enough to be interested in it. Once I learned what it could do I was genuinely floored and have been anticipating the next big release from Spectrasonics ever since. I use RMX in pretty much everything I do and it has been invaluable to me.
And that would be my answer to the question of whether Omnispere will be worth the hype. It is possible for an instrument, like RMX, to do so many things so differently from other instruments, that even a fairly sharp guy like me can fail to see the usefulness of it. And that was with a lot of "hype". If the early exposure and anticipation of Omnisphere can help put it into the consciousness of people who would otherwise have dismissed it and, as a result, have it positively effect the music they make, then it will have been "worth the hype".
When I was building my first serious workstation, I knew that I would use lots of production-ready sounds. At that time I had been curious about Atmosphere since its release, and I'm embarrassed to admit that when RMX came out I didn't understand what it was capable of well enough to be interested in it. Once I learned what it could do I was genuinely floored and have been anticipating the next big release from Spectrasonics ever since. I use RMX in pretty much everything I do and it has been invaluable to me.
And that would be my answer to the question of whether Omnispere will be worth the hype. It is possible for an instrument, like RMX, to do so many things so differently from other instruments, that even a fairly sharp guy like me can fail to see the usefulness of it. And that was with a lot of "hype". If the early exposure and anticipation of Omnisphere can help put it into the consciousness of people who would otherwise have dismissed it and, as a result, have it positively effect the music they make, then it will have been "worth the hype".
If every KVR member wrote one review a year we'd have 1340 reviews each day!
