Is mere simplicity?eduardo_b wrote:Don't see this attribute as a defining factor...Confusing the hell out of people is not, in my mind, a hallmark of excellenceherodotus wrote:But Ockeghem and Des Prez did do some things with rhythm that would confuse the hell out of many people living today.
what nice little pigeonholes: 'mainstream' vs 'non-mainstream'.It's like blaming listeners for being intellectually lazy when they don't like non-mainstream work.
I don't see anyone in here having asserted that confusion is a hallmark of excellence, or a defining factor in say an Ockeghem motet. That takes that post out of context, to make what point exactly?
Now, if all one understands in terms of rhythm is duple subdivisions of the time, and they are *confused* by anything with say a larger coefficient than that two, is the fault necessarily in the person acting as musician or as audience, all other factors being equal?