Smart Electronix

aMUSEd · Post by **aMUSEd** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 12:20 pm

Is there any way to make the CPU setting stay in the same position once set at the level that you want so you don't have to change it every time a patch is changed (as every patch resets it to 100%)

- wouldn't it be better to be independent of the patch changes (like on a settings tab) as its more of a user preference than a musical one?

Rozzer · Post by **Rozzer** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 5:00 pm

Agreed.

Sahul · Post by **Sahul** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 5:18 pm

Me too.

Sahul · Post by **Sahul** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 5:20 pm

[double post]

olepro · Post by **olepro** » Sat Oct 18, 2003 7:36 am

Hi
If you haven´t done it then post your comments to Magnus on the website.
http://www.smartelectronix.com/contact. ... cted=email

Ole

metalsvinet · Post by **metalsvinet** » Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:37 pm

good idea!

aMUSEd · Post by **aMUSEd** » Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:22 pm

olepro wrote:Hi
If you haven´t done it then post your comments to Magnus on the website.
http://www.smartelectronix.com/contact. ... cted=email

Ole

done

smart · Post by **smart** » Tue Oct 21, 2003 9:01 pm

the demo has 2003-10-15 in the date - was there an update I missed or something?

magnus@se · Post by **magnus@se** » Sat Oct 25, 2003 8:01 pm

Yes, there has been an update with a few small bug fixes and a few more presets have been added!

smart · Post by **smart** » Sat Oct 25, 2003 9:31 pm

Can I get the updated full version from the same link I got it from originally?

hey, and it's now 2003-10-25

Rik · Post by **Rik** » Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:45 pm

aMUSEd wrote:Is there any way to make the CPU setting stay in the same position once set at the level that you want so you don't have to change it every time a patch is changed (as every patch resets it to 100%)

- wouldn't it be better to be independent of the patch changes (like on a settings tab) as its more of a user preference than a musical one?

This would be super cool. I would really like to be able to lock the "dry/wet" levels as well. That would be so helpful while browsing presets !!!

Erik.

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:21 am

[DELETED]

tha_man · Post by **tha_man** » Fri Nov 14, 2003 12:12 pm

Ambience is not optimized for P4, and because Athlon doesn't need any special optimisations it runs better. And it's not just ambience... you should stay with AMD for audio apps, at least for now.

DevonB · Post by **DevonB** » Fri Nov 14, 2003 1:40 pm

ttoz wrote:maybe a stupid question, but on my new p4 laptop (yes i am windowz also now )..i've noticed a staggering performance difference (2.4 ghz desktop p4 chip) vs muy old 2.2ghz athlon..even more interesting, is that a friend has a p4 3.2 ghz he picked up yesterday, with 2 gig ddr ram, on asus p4p800, and i went over a couple of hours ago and we tested the ambience demo and he got one more instance than me only...5 overall...(i get 4) vs my old amd chips 9 comfortably!

It's an Ambience thing. It's been confirmed. It's not P4 optimized at all, obviously. I'd rather use Classic Reverb instead. MUCH more friendly on the CPU and sounds just as good.

Devon

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Fri Nov 14, 2003 3:53 pm

[DELETED]

Smart Electronix

KVR Audio

Ambience CPU usage