Don't stop with the thread, leave the forum. You're not happy with its basic reason for it existing and you keep making a twat of yourself.living sounds wrote:I'm at the point now where I've got to say that when the software guy doesn't hear the difference despite all the examples and also shows complete unwillingness to accept the possibility of an actual phenomenom, it's time to change the developer. So I'm not going any further in this thread, because it doesn't lead anywhere.
The Fight for FM
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
- addled muppet weed
- 111301 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
i r troll? 
-
- angelboy
- 4586 posts since 21 Aug, 2001 from Larnaca, Cyprus
But there's one that's going to get even better:herodotus wrote:This thread is awesome.
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3457801
-
tony tony chopper tony tony chopper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3103
- KVRAF
- 3561 posts since 20 Jun, 2002
And you would be very wrong. The presets will tell more about the one(s) who made them than the synth. Unless of course the synth is very limited in its design - if it's 1 single saw oscillator with a lowpass, all presets will indeed sound the same & will show the synth's limits.I would listen to a broad range of presets for a synth and if I would hear certain characteristics across the range of presets, I would consider that to be something rather intrinsic to the synth.
But Sytrus, FM7, Rhino & others offer you so many possibilities, different preset designers will reflect their style in their presets.
DOLPH WILL PWNZ0R J00r LAWZ!!!!
- Beware the Quoth
- 35476 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
would you like the last word of that sentence properly explained to you?living sounds wrote:I can only marvel of the close-mindedness of some people that claim to be 'scientific'.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- KVRAF
- 26972 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
You might be right... However, if all the pro sound designers end up in a certain place, I do not feel confident to put time into this based on the idea that I am somehow going to take the synth some place rather different. So in practice, my assertion becomes so...tony tony chopper wrote:And you would be very wrong. The presets will tell more about the one(s) who made them than the synth. Unless of course the synth is very limited in its design - if it's 1 single saw oscillator with a lowpass, all presets will indeed sound the same & will show the synth's limits.I would listen to a broad range of presets for a synth and if I would hear certain characteristics across the range of presets, I would consider that to be something rather intrinsic to the synth.
But Sytrus, FM7, Rhino & others offer you so many possibilities, different preset designers will reflect their style in their presets.
-
- KVRAF
- 2208 posts since 13 May, 2005
You present your opinion as fact here. And you're wrong, there is such a thing as a basic sound, owing to the nature of the engine that generates the sound.tony tony chopper wrote:
And you would be very wrong. The presets will tell more about the one(s) who made them than the synth. Unless of course the synth is very limited in its design - if it's 1 single saw oscillator with a lowpass, all presets will indeed sound the same & will show the synth's limits.
But Sytrus, FM7, Rhino & others offer you so many possibilities, different preset designers will reflect their style in their presets.
-
- KVRAF
- 2938 posts since 18 Jul, 2005
Yeah, KVR. It's unpleasant accross the board.nuffink wrote:Don't stop with the thread, leave the forum. You're not happy with its basic reason for it existing and you keep making a twat of yourself.living sounds wrote:I'm at the point now where I've got to say that when the software guy doesn't hear the difference despite all the examples and also shows complete unwillingness to accept the possibility of an actual phenomenom, it's time to change the developer. So I'm not going any further in this thread, because it doesn't lead anywhere.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35476 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
dont you mean that its your opinion that he's wrong?living sounds wrote:You present your opinion as fact here. And you're wrong
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."


