Dedicated Solina VSTI [thread from 2009]

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Solina String Ensemble

Post

DragonSagoth wrote:...that Analog String Station looked real nice...
To each their own. I really disliked that projects looks. It was way over-designed. It looked more designed to say, "LOOK AT ME!!!" rather than "PLAY me!"

And, liqih, I like your design philosophy: work on what's really important to the synth (divide down emulation, ensemble, phaser, reverb). String synths don't need arps, IMO, but if you want to arp on, you can add it from somewhere else...Atomic, for example. Filters and such can be added externally, too, not that I'd mind them being included...I always advocate for the inclusion of a Crumar Performer style 3-band EQ (and never get it). But the real essentials look like they're covered in your project.

Post

liqih wrote:I already made an emulation of Solina and Logan, using virtual divide down oscillators (No samples used), Chorus code has been modelled after the Solina schematics, as soon as I finish the graphics I will release the VSTi for Windows, (Mac later), if you want to hear a demo of the sound give me a MIDI file and I will render to you,
Image
http://www.dashsignature.com/SDS/sds_preview.png
How does it stand up to this?
http://www.native-instruments.com/php/f ... ent-V_.mp3

It seems to be the best Solina emulation so far.
Intel Core2 Quad CPU + 4 GIG RAM

Post

emdot_ambient wrote:
DragonSagoth wrote:...that Analog String Station looked real nice...
To each their own. I really disliked that projects looks. It was way over-designed. It looked more designed to say, "LOOK AT ME!!!" rather than "PLAY me!"
I'm with Emdot on this one.
emdot_ambient wrote:And, liqih, I like your design philosophy: work on what's really important to the synth (divide down emulation, ensemble, phaser, reverb). String synths don't need arps
And Again a +1 ;)

but 2 more things :

- i would cut it down even further : the effect section on string machines never have so many knobs/switches/faders, and that is an essential part of their design and what makes them so attractive : not many features, but each one has a strong and unique character.
So phaser, ensemble and reverb should be there indeed, but maybe with only one or two knobs, and not turn into more versatile but also more vanilla efx.

- I like the design philosophy, but i don't really like that actual design sketch (i don't like the label font -at all-, i dislike the blue/green too, the metallic silver grey is damn too cold for a string machine, i don't get the meaning of the "tabletop-alike" design, and i think the most important thing is the synth part, so i don't understand why the effet section takes so many gui space).
Well, of course, as usual : my 2 cents, imho, etc ;)


Looking forward to this (still no mp3 ??), and also looking forward to the Wok one !

Post

sinkmusic wrote:
emdot_ambient wrote:
DragonSagoth wrote:...that Analog String Station looked real nice...
To each their own. I really disliked that projects looks. It was way over-designed. It looked more designed to say, "LOOK AT ME!!!" rather than "PLAY me!"
I'm with Emdot on this one.
emdot_ambient wrote:And, liqih, I like your design philosophy: work on what's really important to the synth (divide down emulation, ensemble, phaser, reverb). String synths don't need arps
And Again a +1 ;)

but 2 more things :

- i would cut it down even further : the effect section on string machines never have so many knobs/switches/faders, and that is an essential part of their design and what makes them so attractive : not many features, but each one has a strong and unique character.
So phaser, ensemble and reverb should be there indeed, but maybe with only one or two knobs, and not turn into more versatile but also more vanilla efx.

- I like the design philosophy, but i don't really like that actual design sketch (i don't like the label font -at all-, i dislike the blue/green too, the metallic silver grey is damn too cold for a string machine, i don't get the meaning of the "tabletop-alike" design, and i think the most important thing is the synth part, so i don't understand why the effet section takes so many gui space).
Well, of course, as usual : my 2 cents, imho, etc ;)


Looking forward to this (still no mp3 ??), and also looking forward to the Wok one !
I would say if you're really modelling a Solina, make it the same. No extra knobs, buttons or FX.
Intel Core2 Quad CPU + 4 GIG RAM

Post

Having once played around with the signal path of a real Logan, I found some very useful variation sounds at different points in the 3 stage BBD chorus. There was also some preset pots on the chorus board - a slight tweak of which gave a sound more like the one I expected of a string machine. This might suggest not all the synths had exactly the same sound from the factory anyway and if the developer produces a fixed setup, you may not find the sound fits your own ideal.

So, if options like these can be easily had, I don't see anything wrong with adding them. Surely it doesn't prevent an emulation sounding like the original? Just makes it more versatile and probably follow a path the real thing might have developed in if production had continued for a few more years.

Jim

Post

Hi liqih,
I for my person like your gui very much. :-)

Maybe that you make two gui for your plug:
One gui which is very near the original look of the solina with only a
few sliders and knobs.
And one gui call it "expert mode" or "modern mode" with more parameters
as the orinal solina.
It could be switchable with a "mode" knob.
So both people could be happy. The people who like the "original" look and
the people who want to modify the sound a little bit more.

Post

Thanks very much for the feedback, it helps!, I try to reply to all of you:
emdot_ambient
I always advocate for the inclusion of a Crumar Performer style 3-band EQ (and never get it).
Actually I was almost to include a 3-band EQ it really change the sounds, but it's anyway a post effect which you can do with another plugin. Crumar Performer had one to replace in the architecture the multi stop of other string machines,
as you know Horn and Brass stops are simply diffrent EQ fo the Viola sound.


electro
How does it stand up to this?
We could culd compare the mp3s later, anyway I know that Reaktor is very capable of such a sound.

sinkmusic
not many features, but each one has a strong and unique character.
the metallic silver grey is damn too cold for a string machine,
Maybe, but I liked the look of Elka Rapsody and Wersi String Orchesta
http://www.till-kopper.de/wersi_string- ... stra_i.jpg

electro
I would say if you're really modelling a Solina, make it the same. No extra knobs, buttons or FX.
yes that was the first idea but then... see what Jim Y says below

Jim Y
This might suggest not all the synths had exactly the same sound from the factory anyway and if the developer produces a fixed setup, you may not find the sound fits your own ideal.

Just makes it more versatile and probably follow a path the real thing might have developed in if production had continued for a few more years.
Absolutely agreed, that's why also while making the Solina chorus from the schematics I found that having a few more parameters twakable allows variations that I would have missed.

Also in my design ther are two more waveforms so that also other sounds from contemporary Crumar and Elka machine can be achieved

Gucky
And one gui call it "expert mode" or "modern mode" with more parameters
as the orinal solina.
It could be switchable with a "mode" knob.

Well this could be a skin change easily, one skin could hide some parameters,
workable idea.

So remember this synth will be skinnable and the skin layout file includes which parameter are visible and their default value.

Thanks

Post

brok landers wrote:i tried all so called stringmachine emulations in the plugin land, and there's only one that is close: the reaktor ensemble of the solina ... all others are faaar away from the sound of a real stringmachine ...
You forgot Synth Squad's Amber though.

Post


Post

Looks a lot better! I like the last one the most.

Perhaps adding some slightly textured background, to appear more "wooden" :)

Could you add another knob for phaser (say, Feedback!) to totally level up with the Ensemble knobs? I love howling phasers!

Post

reddvinylene wrote:
brok landers wrote:i tried all so called stringmachine emulations in the plugin land, and there's only one that is close: the reaktor ensemble of the solina ... all others are faaar away from the sound of a real stringmachine ...
You forgot Synth Squad's Amber though.
i did not, i stated in the other thread that i put high hopes on it ... however, it's not released yet, so i've not mentioned it ... up to now there's only the reaktor ensembles that can compete, when talking about released stuff ...
regards,
brok landers
BIGTONEsounddesign
gear is as good as the innovation behind it-the man

Post

liqih wrote:other GUI ideas http://dashsignature.com/SDS/
Looking good! I think I like the second and fourth from the left best.

Post

DragonSagoth wrote:Looks a lot better! I like the last one the most.

Perhaps adding some slightly textured background, to appear more "wooden" :)

Could you add another knob for phaser (say, Feedback!) to totally level up with the Ensemble knobs? I love howling phasers!

Thanks , actually I should add Mix, Amount is already the feedback, <grin>

Post

dacaumodo wrote:
liqih wrote:other GUI ideas http://dashsignature.com/SDS/
Looking good! I think I like the second and fourth from the left best.
Do you mean Strings_Dream_Synthesizer_3.jpg and sds_variated.jpg? Thanks.

Post

liqih wrote:Thanks , actually I should add Mix, Amount is already the feedback, <grin>
Goodie... then renaming Amount to Feedback could be very helpful to clarify what's what.

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”