KVR Audio

Rottweiler · Post by **Rottweiler** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:43 pm

dirty oscillators wrote:
vespers75 wrote:
Rottweiler wrote:well experimental == seeking new territories.

abstrakt and avangard is simly a bit homo imo .
Is mispelling every other word in a sentence experimental too? Really its just simply a bit "homo", IMO.

beeking a nitpicky smartass loser is homo too ,,l,,

vespers75 · Post by **vespers75** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:00 pm

Rottweiler wrote: beeking a nitpicky smartass loser is homo too ,,l,,

How retarded can you possibly be...what the f**k is a 'beeking'?

Oh, and I almost forgot:

c**t.

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:02 pm

Rottweiler wrote: beeking a nitpicky smartass loser is homo too ,,l,,

you seem to be an expert on the subject. is it something you've studied, or are you just a gifted amateur?

JohnDX · Post by **JohnDX** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:06 pm

vespers75 wrote:
Rottweiler wrote: beeking a nitpicky smartass loser is homo too ,,l,,

How retarded can you possibly be...what the f**k is a 'beeking'?

It's an expert within a given area. First you're a "new bee", then a "moderate bee", and if you keep at it long enough you eventually become a "bee king" (sometimes abbreviated "beeking").

Rottweiler · Post by **Rottweiler** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:15 pm

vespers75 wrote:
Rottweiler wrote: beeking a nitpicky smartass loser is homo too ,,l,,

How retarded can you possibly be...what the f**k is a 'beeking'?

Oh, and I almost forgot:

c**t.

so you are clever enuff to throw shit but not clever enough to recognise typos?

congrat.

Rottweiler · Post by **Rottweiler** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:16 pm

whyterabbyt wrote:
Rottweiler wrote: beeking a nitpicky smartass loser is homo too ,,l,,

you seem to be an expert on the subject. is it something you've studied, or are you just a gifted amateur?

thats weak.

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:18 pm

cleanup on aisle 3 please, clean up on aisle 3.

vespers75 · Post by **vespers75** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:27 pm

Rottweiler wrote:
whyterabbyt wrote:
Rottweiler wrote: beeking a nitpicky smartass loser is homo too ,,l,,

you seem to be an expert on the subject. is it something you've studied, or are you just a gifted amateur?
thats weak.

Still living at your parents' house is 'weak'. But considering your horrid spelling abilities and pointless posts here, you're likely too retarded to live on your own.

Oh, and I almost forgot:
c**t.

Rottweiler · Post by **Rottweiler** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:34 pm

vespers75 wrote:
Rottweiler wrote:
whyterabbyt wrote:
Rottweiler wrote: beeking a nitpicky smartass loser is homo too ,,l,,

you seem to be an expert on the subject. is it something you've studied, or are you just a gifted amateur?
thats weak.
Still living at your parents' house is 'weak'. But considering your horrid spelling abilities and pointless posts here, you're likely too retarded to live on your own.

Oh, and I almost forgot:
c**t.

and how old are you dude, what can you show us? just say one genre and if you make a slicker track than me i will never post here.

come on.

eduardo_b · Post by **eduardo_b** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:34 pm

dirty oscillators wrote:
eduardo_b wrote:But, for the listener, it may be truly experimental.
i disagree, because how would the listener ever know what went into the composition or production of what they're listening to?

I don't think they are the same experience. The listener doesn't have to know, can't really know, what the composer has gone through. An analogy would be film making. The audience might appreciate an innovative, well-crafted film, yet have no idea what the experience is in actually making it. A new experience for both director and viewer, perhaps, but not the same one. I would say the same applies to "experimental" music.

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:36 pm

Rottweiler wrote:
and how old are you dude, what can you show us? just say one genre and if you make a slicker track than me i will never post here.

come on.

x8

any genre?

Rottweiler · Post by **Rottweiler** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:39 pm

as far as thats an electronic style where composition and engineering counts,yes any.

just don tsay some emo - over - the-top i am the überartist but only on kvr bollox. yea?

say minimal, neurofunk, gabber,whatever. be clever and choose a genre which i dont know lol.

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:42 pm

so just electronic genres then?
pussy.

Rottweiler · Post by **Rottweiler** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:42 pm

if you found out what to choose also pm me cause im fkin buzy atthe mo and prolly will forget about this thread forever in 5 minutes.

eduardo_b · Post by **eduardo_b** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:43 pm

whyterabbyt wrote:the thread is based on a question which relies on a fallacy.

The fallacy being the existence of experimental music? I have never contended there's a genre of such music, because by definition it would exist outside of all the "non-experimental" genres. And, the process, for the listener, is irrelevant. It doesn't matter, any more than knowing what hardware was used in popular music matters to listeners. Not seeing a fallacy in the thread title, but rather a question, as noted clearly in the OP. The discussion is about what makes music experimental -- to composer, to listener, to musicologist.

Experimental music defined