LennarDigital

cc-purno · Post by **cc-purno** » Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:54 am

Hi Lennard,

I was busy programming patches and wanted to do some complete kick/base lines and also pads with a sweet high-pass filtered arpeggio on top of it.

Then I realized it could really increase the sound potential of Sylenth1 if you could have a seperate Arpeggiator per part!

Could be used to show off the power of Sylenth1 even more...

CC

Teksonik · Post by **Teksonik** » Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:03 pm

I agree. Or at least the ability to have one section bypass the Arp and/or the individual effects. Then you could have for example an Arp going with Osc sec A and a filter sweep going with Osc Sec B. Or come to think of it a separate Arp/Effects section for each Osc pair.

Plucked Arp/Delay on A and Pad/Reverb on B.

rob_lee · Post by **rob_lee** » Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:05 pm

hi i already asked a while ago for some of these features..here's my original post copied and pasted:

Without wanting to confuse anyone not into designing their own patches i'd love to see the following implemented into any new version of future Sylenth releases..it's just a thought i had whilst programming some patches lately so here's what i'd like in SYLENTH V2.

On page A we have Osc's A1 + A2 and on page B we have Osc's B1 + B2.In any new version of Sylenth i would like to be able to route Osc A on page A to Delay - Osc B on page A to Phaser - Osc A on page B to the Arpeggiator and leave Osc B on page B DRY.
There are plenty of modulation facilitie's as is on Sylenth now but this would be a great feature to impliment for even greater sound designing possibilitie's.
I realise there is'nt much space in which to impliment this but maybe a PAGE C at the top of Sylenth dedicated to routing and modulation only would suffice like i have on my Virus Powercore Vst.
What i mean by all this is that it would be a nice thing to be able to do if we could split all Oscillators and route any 4 to any Mod we like instead of having to have all parts going to Delays,Reverb etc.
A dedicated Page C would solve the space issue on routing though i think...
Oh err without sounding greedy how about a SUB OSC button for each part aswell.Imagine these features guys and gals?This would blow all and any competition to Sylenth out of the water and i'd gladly pay well for them to be implemented in any future versions...
regards
Rob Lee

cc-purno · Post by **cc-purno** » Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:09 pm

I did not want to make the request too complex. (text wise, that is

)
Seperate Arp per part would be a pretty nice start imo.

CC

rob_lee · Post by **rob_lee** » Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:16 pm

cc-purno wrote:I did not want to make the request too complex. (text wise, that is )
Seperate Arp per part would be a pretty nice start imo.

CC

+1

Im with you on all parts mate..Sylenth would be some beast if my suggestions were implimented...and yours

rob

Examigan · Post by **Examigan** » Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:17 pm

cc-purno wrote:Hi Lennard,

I was busy programming patches and wanted to do some complete kick/base lines and also pads with a sweet high-pass filtered arpeggio on top of it.

Then I realized it could really increase the sound potential of Sylenth1 if you could have a seperate Arpeggiator per part!

Could be used to show off the power of Sylenth1 even more...

CC

That would be cool!

Also, disclaimer ahead...sorry if it already does this, but maybe I missed it

Can you save the ARP patterns/settings to a file somehow, then load them back in to a different patch? I don't remember seeing it in there.
If not, I would like that added, too.

Thanks

(TGIF!!)

rob_lee · Post by **rob_lee** » Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:20 pm

@cc

also it's possible right now to get really great kick|bass or Kick|Lead etc from Sylenth with good use of:

Arp | Step Velocity | Lfo 1 & 2 etc..

I did some morphing and drumloops on my first bank..the mp3's are here on the forum some place.
cheers
rob