kae wrote:Quoting Tage from PH: "The audio editing is very bare bones - it's totally not the focus for this program. Audio editing is limited to handling audio clips with fades etc.". You can manually cut it with the razor and thats about it.bmanic wrote:You MUST be kidding? Surely these basic tools will be added. The final is due out in September so there is plenty of time.kae wrote:Disappointing that there are no editing tools. No reverse/normalize/stretch/pitch...nothing![]()
Record: New DAW from Propellerheads
-
christianmusicmaker christianmusicmaker https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=12152
- KVRAF
- 1670 posts since 1 Feb, 2004 from UK
-
- KVRist
- 45 posts since 13 Mar, 2004
so the focus is not audio editing, not midi editing, not virtual instrument playing, not complex mixing, not mastering, ... ??? what is the focus?
did i get something wrong? is it a word processor?
did i get something wrong? is it a word processor?
- KVRAF
- 8700 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
yes, modelled on an SSL consolevanpet wrote:so the focus is not audio editing, not midi editing, not virtual instrument playing, not complex mixing, not mastering, ... ??? what is the focus?
did i get something wrong? is it a word processor?
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
-
- KVRist
- 408 posts since 16 Jan, 2007
That's not really what I was talking about, I was being sarcastic over the notion of VST plugin fans insisting that an application must have everything and there can be no componentizing... so what do they think VST plugins are if not little bits that you buy separately to stick in a host?koalaboy wrote:Whilst you're normally sensible, this is a bit of a stretch. Whilst VST hosting would be nice, all that's really required is record to be a rewire host.blank/diod wrote:Also, let's ban VST plugins since they don't have full DAW functionality. All products must have everything. Mixing and matching is a sin.
It wouldn't add any 'bloat' but would add a lot of flexibility.
Anyway... there are lots of issues with VST plugins that make them poor candidates for Record/Reason integration. We can skip the the tired stability argument and consider another example:
The rack paradigm. All Reason devices have a fixed width, adhere to the same scale and live in the same 'physical' space. VST plugins on the other hand can look like anything. Some are effing heee-uge and have cables on the front(hello Arturia Moog V), some are absolutely tiny. Some have piano keys. Some are a picture of a drumkit, a grand piano or frets and strings. Some have a back side, some have just a front. None of them have the typical CV and audio ports found on Reason devices, obviously. The rack would look like crap on both the back (where most VST plugs would just have a blank surface, I guess) and the front. The only way to get them into a Propellerhead rack would be to have some sort of generic VST rack units with a button that would open the panel in a floating window or whatever. To make a long story short, it would no longer be Record/Reason but more of a frankenstein's monster that would make a ReWire setup look like heaven.
-
- KVRist
- 408 posts since 16 Jan, 2007
I take it that the product name wasn't sufficiently self-explanatory?vanpet wrote:so the focus is not audio editing, not midi editing, not virtual instrument playing, not complex mixing, not mastering, ... ??? what is the focus?
Well then - it's for recording audio. With the emphasis on recording.
A product that specializes on beat mangling, loop mashing, stuttering, non-linear sequencing and other electronica-type stuff would probably not be called "Record" since the aforementioned functionality is the polar opposite of recording.
- KVRAF
- 8700 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
good thing it's not called Quantize thenblank/diod wrote:I take it that the product name wasn't sufficiently self-explanatory?vanpet wrote:so the focus is not audio editing, not midi editing, not virtual instrument playing, not complex mixing, not mastering, ... ??? what is the focus?
Well then - it's for recording audio. With the emphasis on recording.
A product that specializes on beat mangling, loop mashing, stuttering, non-linear sequencing and other electronica-type stuff would probably not be called "Record" since the aforementioned functionality is the polar opposite of recording.
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
- KVRAF
- 11375 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Holy crap! Ok.. I guess I'll ignore recommending this stuff to anybody then.kae wrote:Quoting Tage from PH: "The audio editing is very bare bones - it's totally not the focus for this program. Audio editing is limited to handling audio clips with fades etc.". You can manually cut it with the razor and thats about it.bmanic wrote:You MUST be kidding? Surely these basic tools will be added. The final is due out in September so there is plenty of time.kae wrote:Disappointing that there are no editing tools. No reverse/normalize/stretch/pitch...nothing![]()
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
-
- KVRAF
- 2685 posts since 14 Jul, 2005 from Australia
To be honest, the only thing I really want to try out is the SSL emulation, shame that there aren't any good low-priced SSL emulations in VST land. Once again, if only Reason (and Record) were VST plugins .etc 
Last edited by fgimian on Mon May 11, 2009 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Zargon the Destroyer Zargon the Destroyer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=161730
- KVRist
- 127 posts since 1 Oct, 2007
Weird.
If it's basically Garage Band (My First DAW) then why bother with the modelled SSL stuff? And all the fairly elaborate-looking insert/send stuff?
Talk about answering a question nobody asked...
If it's basically Garage Band (My First DAW) then why bother with the modelled SSL stuff? And all the fairly elaborate-looking insert/send stuff?
Talk about answering a question nobody asked...
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Oooh... disappointing. 
- KVRAF
- 7794 posts since 20 Jul, 2004 from Clearwater
The Glue?soundpalace wrote:To be honest, the only thing I really want to try out is the SSL emulation, shame that there aren't any good low-priced SSL emulations in VST land. Once again, if only Reason (and Record) were VST plugins .etc
Wavsen.com - Professional mix delivery platform with client approval, watermarking, and portfolio page builder.
-
- KVRAF
- 10170 posts since 2 Jan, 2005 from somewhere in the woods
+1 and moreheadquest wrote:Now that is really awesomeblank/diod wrote:Sure, ReGroove is present in Record as well, there's a 'G' button on the far right of the transport panel. Owning Reason isn't a requirement.headquest wrote:Yes I agree.
One question I have (... @ blank/diod ...?) -
With Record + Reason, will it be possible to use the ReGroove mixer within Record?
"It dreamed itself along"
-
- KVRAF
- 2685 posts since 14 Jul, 2005 from Australia
Oh yeah, will check that out again, thx for reminding me.djanthonyw wrote:The Glue?soundpalace wrote:To be honest, the only thing I really want to try out is the SSL emulation, shame that there aren't any good low-priced SSL emulations in VST land. Once again, if only Reason (and Record) were VST plugins .etc
- KVRAF
- 26963 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Hard to see how this appeals, except for Reason owners. For non-commercial use, Reaper is $50 ($250 less that Record) and it is great at recording audio, fully functional demo, and lets you use any 3rd party effects you want.blank/diod wrote:I take it that the product name wasn't sufficiently self-explanatory?vanpet wrote:so the focus is not audio editing, not midi editing, not virtual instrument playing, not complex mixing, not mastering, ... ??? what is the focus?
Well then - it's for recording audio. With the emphasis on recording.
A product that specializes on beat mangling, loop mashing, stuttering, non-linear sequencing and other electronica-type stuff would probably not be called "Record" since the aforementioned functionality is the polar opposite of recording.
For Reason users, looks okay since it is half off and much more functional.
Last edited by pdxindy on Mon May 11, 2009 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRian
- 611 posts since 21 Oct, 2006
Wait, can you import audio? It would be nice if you could use the mixer and compressor for mastering purposes.