The MIDI editing of EnergyXT has been nicely demonstrated by liquidsounds video. The comparison was being made against M2 with the view of making M3 even better and it sounds like Jo too has been impressed with a lot of what liquidsound has shown in his video.
As for EnergyXT2.5.x being more complete it refers to the application as a whole as it already has time stretch and freeze track. The point I am making is that it is a good A/B against the younger MU.LAB.
EnergyXT seems to have found its way, whether you think it good or bad. MU.LAB is not yet set in stone and can benefit from looking at its competition.
I am not here to say one is better that the other more seeing what MU.LAB is up against in the market place and for me EnergyXT is a good A/B.
I am glad you have voiced your opinion. Why not tell us about your experiences with DAWs etc in the "Who are you" topic.
(Oh and by the way I have been giving EnergyXT 2.5.x a good going over and so far not one crash, z3ta+ has not missed a beat. Maybe I am in the minority but I am enjoying the app tremendously.)
As with MU.LAB, EnergyXT is not finished either, both are under developement and I respect the hard work by both teams, I wish I could program something as good as these two DAWs but I cannot.
But as I said I will spend an entire week on the app.
Jens, nice to here from you this forum needs as many opinions as possible and I could not careless if your opinions are anti mine I want to hear them and I guess Jo does to, keep your comments coming.
anubis2010
