Are you sure to quit?
-
TheGuysanIdiot TheGuysanIdiot https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=213066
- KVRist
- 308 posts since 10 Aug, 2009 from United Kingdom
Jo,
I cannot remember if I have asked you this before.
If I am working on a new session and then I do: File > Save Session. I then do: File > Quit.
MU.LAB always shows me the "Are you sure to quit?" with 3 options. Why does MU.LAB not just exit as the file has already been saved.
What do other forum members think about the "Are you sure to quit?" method.
Will M3 work the same as M2 in this respect?
OZ
I cannot remember if I have asked you this before.
If I am working on a new session and then I do: File > Save Session. I then do: File > Quit.
MU.LAB always shows me the "Are you sure to quit?" with 3 options. Why does MU.LAB not just exit as the file has already been saved.
What do other forum members think about the "Are you sure to quit?" method.
Will M3 work the same as M2 in this respect?
OZ
-
- KVRAF
- 5573 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
It's OK to ask but the Saving options are useless if the file has been saved already.
Beside this one,
when we work on multiple takes, especially when things are coming faster than you can think, there is always a confirmatory message before you can hit Recording again.
Since I have no saying in what the Engine does, the message is useless, unless it is used to cover the time MuLab takes to get ready for the next action.....that would be sneaky
Beside this one,
when we work on multiple takes, especially when things are coming faster than you can think, there is always a confirmatory message before you can hit Recording again.
Since I have no saying in what the Engine does, the message is useless, unless it is used to cover the time MuLab takes to get ready for the next action.....that would be sneaky
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
-
- Hun #3
- 4265 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from A quaint little village just south of Hamburg, Germany
To be honest, I think the whole saving process needs to be examined for flow - it seems to be that extra bit slower than in most other apps, one of the biggest reasons being the slightly cumbersome filenaming dialogue without text-style selection functionality. It doesn't really invite you to churn out a series of song versions in a 'song_001, song_002, song_003, ...' style (which is my school of do).
Marco
Marco
- KVRAF
- 7412 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
I gave up on this one back in LUNA. File operations are those where I'd most like to see the native widgets used because that's the point I'm interacting closely with the "outside world". And there is a "normal workflow" associated with an editor - when you hit exit, it says "do you want to save" if there are unsaved changes; it only prompts for a new name if there's no current file. Else you do "Save As" to create a new file and start work on it.
"Are you sure you want to exit?" might be appropriate if it was going to take a long time to get out of the app and restart it. But MU.LAB isn't like that. It's fast. If I exited accidentally, I can run it again - probably nearly as fast as I can say "no" to the "are you sure" pop up!
(Recently use sessions would be handy...)
"Are you sure you want to exit?" might be appropriate if it was going to take a long time to get out of the app and restart it. But MU.LAB isn't like that. It's fast. If I exited accidentally, I can run it again - probably nearly as fast as I can say "no" to the "are you sure" pop up!
(Recently use sessions would be handy...)
- KVRAF
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
Yes, no change (yet) on this.TheGuysanIdiot wrote:Jo,
I cannot remember if I have asked you this before.
If I am working on a new session and then I do: File > Save Session. I then do: File > Quit.
MU.LAB always shows me the "Are you sure to quit?" with 3 options. Why does MU.LAB not just exit as the file has already been saved.
What do other forum members think about the "Are you sure to quit?" method.
Will M3 work the same as M2 in this respect?
OZ
There are so many aspects that define whether a session has changed or not that it is very complex to track that.
In fact, even just tweaking a controller on your MIDI keyboard 'changes' a session.
- KVRAF
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
Euh, could you please post a screenshot; Not sure which 'confirmation message' you mean.liquidsound wrote:It's OK to ask but the Saving options are useless if the file has been saved already.
Beside this one,
when we work on multiple takes, especially when things are coming faster than you can think, there is always a confirmatory message before you can hit Recording again.
Since I have no saying in what the Engine does, the message is useless, unless it is used to cover the time MuLab takes to get ready for the next action.....that would be sneaky
Thanks.
- KVRAF
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
Note that when you click a file in the file list, that name will be used as default in the 'New File Name' dialog. So then it's easy to just change the version number of your file.Bonteburg wrote:To be honest, I think the whole saving process needs to be examined for flow - it seems to be that extra bit slower than in most other apps, one of the biggest reasons being the slightly cumbersome filenaming dialogue without text-style selection functionality. It doesn't really invite you to churn out a series of song versions in a 'song_001, song_002, song_003, ...' style (which is my school of do).
Marco
- KVRAF
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
Well in fact it was the intention to use 'native' file selection dialogs.pljones wrote:I gave up on this one back in LUNA. File operations are those where I'd most like to see the native widgets used because that's the point I'm interacting closely with the "outside world".
But i encountered too many difficulties in customizing them (especially on OSX) that i had practically no choice of creating a MUTOOLS GUI version of them.
I'm open to improve the file selection dialog where appropriate.
Yes i agree.And there is a "normal workflow" associated with an editor - when you hit exit, it says "do you want to save" if there are unsaved changes; it only prompts for a new name if there's no current file. Else you do "Save As" to create a new file and start work on it.
"Are you sure you want to exit?" might be appropriate if it was going to take a long time to get out of the app and restart it. But MU.LAB isn't like that. It's fast. If I exited accidentally, I can run it again - probably nearly as fast as I can say "no" to the "are you sure" pop up!
But i find it practically quite complex to track every possible change to a session. There are so many aspects!
It's on the whishlist for a longer time already.Recently use sessions would be handy...
So i've pushed it's priority and will implement it in M3.
-
TheGuysanIdiot TheGuysanIdiot https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=213066
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 308 posts since 10 Aug, 2009 from United Kingdom
Jo,
"There are so many aspects that define whether a session has changed or not that it is very complex to track that."
I thought you had a good reason for having MU.LAB quit the way it does and that is fine with me. The way it currently quits is very safe. So I will live with it and call it a feature.
OZ
"There are so many aspects that define whether a session has changed or not that it is very complex to track that."
I thought you had a good reason for having MU.LAB quit the way it does and that is fine with me. The way it currently quits is very safe. So I will live with it and call it a feature.
OZ
- KVRAF
- 7412 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
Another example of "overdoing it" - if you change which cell has focus or the zoom level in MSExcel, it asks if you want to save. I'm thinking "I haven't changed the data!". Essentially, any UI action causes the "dirty" flag to be set, so what would be a "hard" problem is made "easy" -- but you're still left with an annoyed user! 
But at least I can do "File->Save" followed immediately "File->Exit" and not be prompted if I want to save. But I guess changing MU.LAB to be like Excel would have sufficiently little benefit in user workflow to mean it's not worthwhile.
And I know, from the programs I write, that tracking changes down to the most granular level needs to be designed in from day one or it's incredibly painful to add, so I guess the benefit vs developer effort on this feature probably puts it below the "good idea" level
.
But at least I can do "File->Save" followed immediately "File->Exit" and not be prompted if I want to save. But I guess changing MU.LAB to be like Excel would have sufficiently little benefit in user workflow to mean it's not worthwhile.
And I know, from the programs I write, that tracking changes down to the most granular level needs to be designed in from day one or it's incredibly painful to add, so I guess the benefit vs developer effort on this feature probably puts it below the "good idea" level
-
- KVRAF
- 5573 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
"! Event Recording Discarded".mutools wrote: Euh, could you please post a screenshot; Not sure which 'confirmation message' you mean.
Thanks.
I understand that is useful to make the user aware that he could have accidentally pushed Cancel. It takes around 2 to 3 seconds to get back into the groove. It feels like a hiccup
Nothing major Jo.
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
- KVRAF
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
Ah, that one.
Maybe it's indeed a bit superfluous.
Do others also feel it should be removed?
Maybe it's indeed a bit superfluous.
Do others also feel it should be removed?
-
TheGuysanIdiot TheGuysanIdiot https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=213066
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 308 posts since 10 Aug, 2009 from United Kingdom
Jo,
My vote = remove it.
OZ
My vote = remove it.
OZ
-
- KVRAF
- 2938 posts since 18 Jul, 2005
Yeah, I'd like to see it gone too.mutools wrote:Ah, that one.
Maybe it's indeed a bit superfluous.
Do others also feel it should be removed?
- KVRAF
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
