Well, there are any number of ways of interpreting this. One is awareness of the larger world and our place in it. In an ego-centric culture, looking beyond our noses is not always the rule. Nor is awareness. If the words are not taken literally, a lot of ways to think about life open up.thecontrolcentre wrote:Look at the stars
See how they shine for you
and all the things you do
FFS
Getting paid stealing somebody's else work?!?!
-
- KVRAF
- 11839 posts since 23 Nov, 2004 from west of east
We escape the trap of our own subjectivity by
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
-
- KVRer
- 17 posts since 5 Dec, 2004
its a bit like kylie ripping off opus 3 or nirvana ripping off the killing joke. swap a few notes around and voila!
its more than just the chords, its the instrumentation and the playing style. i think it sits perfectly between plagiarism and theft.
david nutella is crap anyway, if your gonna rip off somebody, rip off miles davis or jimmy hendrix, not coldplay.
its more than just the chords, its the instrumentation and the playing style. i think it sits perfectly between plagiarism and theft.
david nutella is crap anyway, if your gonna rip off somebody, rip off miles davis or jimmy hendrix, not coldplay.
- KVRAF
- 37408 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
I don't think they do have an "obvious lack" of prowess and the stuff I like by them is very sincere and tender - indeed that's what I like about them. Songs like "Trouble" or "Yellow" are just beautiful with great lyrics and music and so is some of their later stuff though I feel they have got rather samey (but so do a lot of bands).jancivil wrote: otoh coldplay are shit is a statement I can get behind. in terms of their insincerity and obvious lack of prowess, they are shit.
- KVRAF
- 1736 posts since 19 May, 2006 from Nomadic (Chicago and San Francisco mostly)
There's a theoretically infinite number of sonic combinations. However, a very finite number of them are tolerable to listen to (historically speaking.. we're leaving out light noise and power electronics.. which most people disregard anyway).
Personally, I think Coldplay is annoying. I don't know if they are talented or not, but I don't respect them as artists (for all I know they're really nice people though) and I can't stand that vocal style (yet I find a demented skinny Californian screaming "divine infect, divine infection" with demonic effects on his vocals really awesome).
To each his own.. just.. keep your own.. over there.. so I don't have to hear it
Personally, I think Coldplay is annoying. I don't know if they are talented or not, but I don't respect them as artists (for all I know they're really nice people though) and I can't stand that vocal style (yet I find a demented skinny Californian screaming "divine infect, divine infection" with demonic effects on his vocals really awesome).
To each his own.. just.. keep your own.. over there.. so I don't have to hear it
noise and beats: Negutyv Xeiro do people actually click these?
gearlust: Roland JP-8000, too much/not enough eurorack
machinecode by: u-he, Bitwig, Fabfilter, NI, et al
gearlust: Roland JP-8000, too much/not enough eurorack
machinecode by: u-he, Bitwig, Fabfilter, NI, et al
-
- KVRAF
- 1907 posts since 29 Oct, 2003
+1Personally, I think Coldplay is annoying.
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
I love this about musical sites on the internet.
People start throwing opinions around, because that's what people do. Most of these opinions are negative because homo contemporaneus is a querulous animal.
Because musicians are sensitive types, they are, quite naturally, offended when they see someone writing nasty things about their favorite artists. But because they have to pretend that they are tough (everyone is a tough guy on the internet), they don't say: 'that offends me'. No, they remember who offended them and vow to abuse them later, when they are foolish enough to voice their enthusiasm about something.
This repetitive loop of hostility accounts for at least 35% of the bandwidth consumed on music-related internet sites.
People start throwing opinions around, because that's what people do. Most of these opinions are negative because homo contemporaneus is a querulous animal.
Because musicians are sensitive types, they are, quite naturally, offended when they see someone writing nasty things about their favorite artists. But because they have to pretend that they are tough (everyone is a tough guy on the internet), they don't say: 'that offends me'. No, they remember who offended them and vow to abuse them later, when they are foolish enough to voice their enthusiasm about something.
This repetitive loop of hostility accounts for at least 35% of the bandwidth consumed on music-related internet sites.
- KVRAF
- 37408 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Since the coming of the interweb a new species, Homo contemptoranus, has rapidly evolvedherodotus wrote:I love this about musical sites on the internet.
People start throwing opinions around, because that's what people do. Most of these opinions are negative because homo contemporaneus is a querulous animal.
-
- KVRAF
- 1907 posts since 29 Oct, 2003
Deep....
-
- KVRAF
- 6377 posts since 8 Jun, 2009
Which makes them 40% nicer than most internet sites.herodotus wrote: This repetitive loop of hostility accounts for at least 35% of the bandwidth consumed on music-related internet sites.
- KVRAF
- 1736 posts since 19 May, 2006 from Nomadic (Chicago and San Francisco mostly)
Well, since you didn't point out who you were directing it at, I will assume you were directing it at me. And I am offended.herodotus wrote:People start throwing opinions around, because that's what people do. Most of these opinions are negative because homo contemporaneus is a querulous animal.
My opinion was stated in the course of discussion and in no way impacted my statements or biased my other statements.
If a band I particularly like is sampled/copied/et al by a band I don't particularly like, I might be a sour bitch about it, but such is the nature of all mankind does, building upon what others have done. "There is nothing new under the sun" (and I'm sure the writer(s) of Ecclesiastes wasn't the first to say it!)
In fact, your comments appear to be a sort of passive-aggressive attack upon someone, or perhaps a general directionless anger. Perhaps you would like to talk about it? Because I'm certain everyone here can agree that people, no matter online or off, are quite often assholes. Though some are nicer about it than others.
edit: typo.. probably more in there!
noise and beats: Negutyv Xeiro do people actually click these?
gearlust: Roland JP-8000, too much/not enough eurorack
machinecode by: u-he, Bitwig, Fabfilter, NI, et al
gearlust: Roland JP-8000, too much/not enough eurorack
machinecode by: u-he, Bitwig, Fabfilter, NI, et al
-
- KVRAF
- 6377 posts since 8 Jun, 2009
aMUSEd wrote:Since the coming of the interweb a new species, Homo contemptoranus, has rapidly evolvedherodotus wrote:I love this about musical sites on the internet.
People start throwing opinions around, because that's what people do. Most of these opinions are negative because homo contemporaneus is a querulous animal.
I understand Homo pretentious is related by descent.
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
xybre wrote:Well, since you didn't point out who you were directing it at, I will assume you were directing it at me. And I am offended.herodotus wrote:People start throwing opinions around, because that's what people do. Most of these opinions are negative because homo contemporaneus is a querulous animal.
My opinion was stated in the course of discussion and in no way impacted my statements or biased my other statements.
If a band I particularly like is sampled/copied/et al by a band I don't particularly like, I might be a sour bitch about it, but such is the nature of all mankind does, building upon what others have done. "There is nothing new under the sun" (and I'm sure the writer(s) of Ecclesiastes wasn't the first to say it!)
In fact, your comments appear to be a sort of passive-aggressive attack upon someone, or perhaps a general directionless anger. Perhaps you would like to talk about it? Because I'm certain everyone here can agree that people, no matter online or off, are quite often assholes. Though some are nicer about it than others.
edit: typo.. probably more in there!
Wow.
Sir, I have no idea who you are, really.
I was just making a general observation. Assuming it was a veiled attack on anyone is erroneous.
When I want to address what someone in particular says, I generally quote them.