Your point as I understand was that 'people who don't care about music' (I interpreted that as meaning casual listeners) need a vocal to like music. I picked the pop classical example because it was the best example I could think of people buying instrumental music where they are not greatly concerned about the context in which it would normally sit (why have a collection of "best of Mozart" when you can just go get them in their entirety?). And so it maybe is the thing for people who 'don't care about music'. But if people buy and listen to that stuff, then it hardly indicates they 'need' a vocal to hear music.jancivil wrote:What I meant - and didn't convey so well - is that non-musicians are not so much interested in the melody if a person isn't singing it.
What's the argument with the rolling eyes? I said Cyndi sells the tune with the lyric. I'm sure there are plenty people who are utterly non plussed with Miles's version, who adore Cyndi and bought all her records.
In terms of 'did well/sold' why don't we look at relative pop vs classical sales, which I'll bet you money supports what I'm saying here.
Beyond that, maybe it is that people who bought the classical arrangement, or the Z cover, can characterize people who care about music more than the people who stick with Britney et al's original?
That pop outsells classical in general is not in dispute. But, those snippet compilations have done very well for some time.
EDIT: Thinking about it, Kenny G is a more obvious example. But I only just thought of it.