well, to be fair, he's not really talking about quality as an absolute, but in terms of two sets of results on exactly the same gear. talking about what the gear is, isnt actually that relevant to that.computercontrolled wrote:I think quality can misunerstood, theres no point (for me at least) to talk about quality uf ur using m-audio stuff por example, in a home/room studio
Cubase & Ableton DAC
- Beware the Quoth
- 35520 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 56 posts since 6 May, 2009
Came across this post in another thread, comments?
Winstontaneous wrote:I remember coming across this site comparing spectrograms of various DAWs/audio editors doing Sample Rate Conversion (SRC):
http://src.infinitewave.ca
It does appear that the different algorithms used for SRC in different DAWs could have audible effects...
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 56 posts since 6 May, 2009
Look people, I am not trying to stir up any controversy nor was I influenced by the nonsense of Villafabio or whatever. Did not even see the article until today, I would just like concrete answers from the experts in the audio software field.
Being an Audio Production student at this time, I would like to learn more on the topic of DAWs and their programming (engine, processing - whatever you want to call it) possibly affecting the lossless formats in any way or affecting the output of sound generators/soft-synths/samplers etc.
I will be running some tests next week, but all feedback is welcome!
Thanks
Being an Audio Production student at this time, I would like to learn more on the topic of DAWs and their programming (engine, processing - whatever you want to call it) possibly affecting the lossless formats in any way or affecting the output of sound generators/soft-synths/samplers etc.
I will be running some tests next week, but all feedback is welcome!
Thanks
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein
- KVRAF
- 13140 posts since 7 May, 2006 from Southern California
Are we really on page 2 and no one has said that there is no such thing as a software DAC? By definition, such a thing is impossible. No DAW application/host/audio editor has a DAC. The ones and zeros get converted to analog voltage in your sound card.
As far as "audio engines" are concerned, there is no difference in how one applications adds two or more signals together. There may be a difference between methods used to convert sample rate, dither, timestretch or further process audio but that has nothing to do with one applications ability to record, playback or sum audio together v. another.
As far as "audio engines" are concerned, there is no difference in how one applications adds two or more signals together. There may be a difference between methods used to convert sample rate, dither, timestretch or further process audio but that has nothing to do with one applications ability to record, playback or sum audio together v. another.
-
- Banned
- 915 posts since 1 Jan, 2009
Yes pleasearielgraff wrote:Can we have some more inputs on this topic especially from experts! So does the "engine" really make the difference?
There's nothing I love more than a panel of experts
TONEDEAD Love Sharts
-
- KVRian
- 1302 posts since 9 Oct, 2003 from California
I thought I (and Steffensen) did on the first page. Perhaps I was too cryptic.justin3am wrote:Are we really on page 2 and no one has said that there is no such thing as a software DAC? By definition, such a thing is impossible. No DAW application/host/audio editor has a DAC. The ones and zeros get converted to analog voltage in your sound card.
Dan
Those that can, do. Those that can't, argue about it on k-v-r
- KVRAF
- 13140 posts since 7 May, 2006 from Southern California
Ah, so you did. Perhaps, I'm just too dense.dgkenney wrote:
I thought I (and Steffensen) did on the first page. Perhaps I was too cryptic.
Dan
