V-Machine

Anything about hardware musical instruments.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

DragonSagoth wrote:CPU inside the V-Machine is not the standard consumer-grade AMD or Intel CPU, so I don't think you can replace it on your own. Motherboard is also custom.
Umm, yes it is. In order to run VST binaries it has to be Intel-compatible. My bet is its a 1 Ghz Intel Atom single-core... but it may be something even weaker like a VIA C4. The 'custom motherboard" looks alot like a Mini ITX motherboard. So the CPU/motherboard portion of it is $80 at any vendor.

Post

It's not an Intel or AMD CPU, VFXAU said so himself somewhere in this topic.

Post

Then its a VIA C4... no wonder its so underpowered. Its something compatible at a binary level with VSTs that have been compiled for x86 processor architectures and... well... those are the three options.

Post

Ashe37 wrote:Then its a VIA C4... no wonder its so underpowered. Its something compatible at a binary level with VSTs that have been compiled for x86 processor architectures and... well... those are the three options.
I rally wish you would not say if you are not sure.. it has been said in several forums that the CPU is a C7 not a C4.. if you don't know then say you don't know... also it has 2 CPU's in it not one, it is not an ITX board, (AN ITX WOULD NOT FIT IN A V-MACHINE BOX). one CPU takes care of all IO and screen and the other is specifically engineered in software to take care of VST's. The NEW CPU has a different chipset as well, it is around 2.3-3 times the power (depends on which plugins you are running) and can handle 2gig or memory.
The sun is going to shine in the morning, at least above the clouds.

Post

VFXAU wrote: I rally wish you would not say if you are not sure.. it has been said in several forums that the CPU is a C7 not a C4.. if you don't know then say you don't know... also it has 2 CPU's in it not one, it is not an ITX board, (AN ITX WOULD NOT FIT IN A V-MACHINE BOX). one CPU takes care of all IO and screen and the other is specifically engineered in software to take care of VST's. The NEW CPU has a different chipset as well, it is around 2.3-3 times the power (depends on which plugins you are running) and can handle 2gig or memory.
So show us already. You talk a lot but up to now it's just that... all talk.

Post

Ok, so its a Via C-7... on the equivalent of a mini itx motherboard.... so the CPU and motherboard are about $50. That makes it worth $1000... NOT. For $30 more on their side, it could be running a much more capable processor.

Post

i'm no marketing expert or guru, but i think maybe what makes it worth $1000 or whatever, imho, is theres not a competitor at any price.

as soon as there is that changes the value.


in the meantime it looked like a very cool box. even if you were to just run one lightweight vsti at a time the value of that w/o bootup times and with such a very small size, thats a very cool thing. when i picked it up at namm was amazed how light it was. like a medium sized DI box.

Post

its really easy: if you think it is too expensive - dont buy it. it is not only the hardware. you can buy a motherboard with a via c7 for 50 bucks as you wrote. good luck to play vsti with this hardware ...

max

Post

Don't get me wrong, it's a useful product to me. I bought it new for €199,- which is pretty cheap, and I would have been perfectly happy to use it as-is with all the current limitations.
What pisses me off is that SMPA have been promising updates & upgrades for quite some time now and continue to do so, which raises my expectations of the possibilities & potential of the box, but they don't deliver.

Post

mäxchen wrote:its really easy: if you think it is too expensive - dont buy it. it is not only the hardware. you can buy a motherboard with a via c7 for 50 bucks as you wrote. good luck to play vsti with this hardware ...

max
That's my point. A 1 GHz VIA C7 is about 25% of the processor power of the Pentium Dual Core that is (for the time being) in my dedicated music system, especially in floating point processes. (Hint: Many DSP processes are floating point processes.) And I have several softsynths that i can easily run up to 25% on that machine (I usually mix down softsynths on my quad core) which means that particular instance of those synths would not play on the V-Machine. The V-machine also doesn't have enough storage to be used for most of the sample-based softsynths. I'd go into more detail about how that $1000 could be better spent but that would be a thread in and of itself.

Post

oh think it is interesting. i paid about 600$ new, so what 1000$ are you talking.
i dont think the vmachine is perfect but there is no other vstplayer with this size und connections for this price or better said i dont know a better. all vsti i need work for me with a polyphony that is enough for me. the cpu power of the vmachine is poor, no question, the loading time between preset changes is not funny but show me a better system, so small so cheap to play MY vsti...

Post

mäxchen wrote:oh think it is interesting. i paid about 600$ new, so what 1000$ are you talking.
i dont think the vmachine is perfect but there is no other vstplayer with this size und connections for this price or better said i dont know a better. all vsti i need work for me with a polyphony that is enough for me. the cpu power of the vmachine is poor, no question, the loading time between preset changes is not funny but show me a better system, so small so cheap to play MY vsti...
Like this one for example?!

http://www.museresearch.com/news.php?id=123

:lol:

Post

i saw this some days ago but it is more expensive, bigger and the knobs are on the front. when it is on my midi keyboard i cant use it. vmachine has it controls on top - perfect. BUT it looks very nice from a technical piont of view

max

Post

delafuerte, Musebox is probably also gonna be limited, no more than 2 VSTi at any time.

Also Muse Research has a problem with getting the newest VSTs "receptorized". They are too slow.

I, for one, think it's the best to build an embedded PC system (something like HTPC), in a box that would be a bit bigger than V-Machine, but it would work with everything with no hassle. Put some nLited Windows XP there and it's fast, too. And it would probably be cheaper than both V-Machine and Musebox.

Post

Well, Musebox should be able to run Ivory and onother vst like B4 togheter....try to do the same (nowadays!!!) on the v-machine!!!

The absence of knobs (for output volume) IMHO is one of the weakness of the v-machine, especially in live situation! For sure on the top would have been better (one minus for musebox)!

More expansive?! Take the original price of the v-machine, upgrade the ram, add the new CPU upgrade (that its not free!!!!) and you will realize that is not so far!

Post Reply

Return to “Hardware (Instruments and Effects)”