It's a free one.UltraJv wrote:Sarcasm - theres an app for that.
May need some intelligence to use.. beware!
It's a free one.UltraJv wrote:Sarcasm - theres an app for that.
spaceman wrote:It's a free one.UltraJv wrote:Sarcasm - theres an app for that.
May need some intelligence to use.. beware!
The real point is that Flash is NOT a good web solution at all. It's processing and resource heavy and it's a bitch to develop and maintain. It's had its use and it will disappear soon enough. Adobe hasn't done anything to make it better and there's technologies arising that will make it redundant. HTML 5 being the most likely candidate.TristezaOrange wrote:I was just taking a dump and reading CM and I came upon this paragraph:
"We recommend viral Flash game hit Canabalt as a perfect example of this (composing with a limited palette), as it manages to be both cinematic and minimal in the same breath"... etc.
If you visit tigsource.com, you're going to see how enormous the selection of absolutely class Flash games is. But hey, you say it's shit. I'm uninstalling it as we speak.
BTW does Unity run on those iThings? Probably not, but if I can play Off-Road Velociraptor Safari I may get an iPad. Just for that.
[edited because while what I wrote was not offensive to spaceman, he could take it that way, so removed]
Taking things in good humour.. you don't need an app for that!UltraJv wrote:spaceman wrote:It's a free one.UltraJv wrote:Sarcasm - theres an app for that.
May need some intelligence to use.. beware!![]()
![]()
Unity wont run on it, but you can build from Unity for iPod, so probably yes.TristezaOrange wrote:BTW does Unity run on those iThings? Probably not, but if I can play Off-Road Velociraptor Safari I may get an iPad. Just for that.
So HTML5 wont be processing or resource heavy, wont be a bitch to develop for (differing implementations across browsers will suddenly just vanish as a problem) and it'll be far easier to maintain since it'll be buried in a whole load of other markup.spaceman wrote:The real point is that Flash is NOT a good web solution at all. It's processing and resource heavy and it's a bitch to develop and maintain. It's had its use and it will disappear soon enough. Adobe hasn't done anything to make it better and there's technologies arising that will make it redundant. HTML 5 being the most likely candidate.
ok, the jury is still out on that one, but it can hardly be worse than Flash.whyterabbyt wrote:So HTML5 wont be processing or resource heavy, wont be a bitch to develop for (differing implementations across browsers will suddenly just vanish as a problem) and it'll be far easier to maintain since it'll be buried in a whole load of other markup.spaceman wrote:The real point is that Flash is NOT a good web solution at all. It's processing and resource heavy and it's a bitch to develop and maintain. It's had its use and it will disappear soon enough. Adobe hasn't done anything to make it better and there's technologies arising that will make it redundant. HTML 5 being the most likely candidate.
Okay, Im convinced.
<cough> CSSspaceman wrote:ok, the jury is still out on that one, but it can hardly be worse than Flash.
well, ok.. there is that onewhyterabbyt wrote:<cough> CSSspaceman wrote:ok, the jury is still out on that one, but it can hardly be worse than Flash.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026