It already was in OSC IIIhakey wrote:It's already been mentioned, but I'd really like to see TAL Elec7ro - maybe OSC16/17?
[EDIT]
What's so great in this bass-oriented synth at all?
It already was in OSC IIIhakey wrote:It's already been mentioned, but I'd really like to see TAL Elec7ro - maybe OSC16/17?
As a general purpose synth, no, it isn't. As a thing capable of a few interesting sounds, probably yes...hakey wrote: Yes, of course, but do you really think that Anubis is as good as (or better than) Synth1?
A synth should be a synth, not an FX unithakey wrote:A couple of objective differences: the delay on Anubis is a single, mono mode, chorus is one mode with only one control parameter, there's no phaser, no arpeggiator,
Which in S1 is not that good at all...hakey wrote:no fm.
That's no merit of the synth, and I don't like presets anywayhakey wrote:And 10,000+ patches vs. 60 or so?
That may be, haven't tried yet... with S1any kick - or any other sound, for that matter - varies in volume and bass frequencies content at each note to the point that it drove me mad...hakey wrote:Also, routing a fast env to pitch sweep a sine osc should produce a decent kick - I can only get a weak, flabby thump that varies in volume considerably from one note to the next.
Subjectively, that's exactly what S1 sounds like to my earshakey wrote:Subjectively: to my ears Anubis sounds boxy, weak and ill defined in the bottom end, harsh and unpleasant at the top - I find it very fatiguing to listen to at anything but low levels.
That may be, haven't tried yethakey wrote: There seems to be a lot of energy being produced outside of the desired freq range - eg. a patch that doesn't sound all that loud can still be pushing the levels into clipping. The user definable env, a nice idea and Anubis' only distinguishing feature, is so fiddly as to be almost unusable.
I tried it for a few hours today, and its exactly as you say, no good way of making kicks in that one, I also noticed that the volume of each kick was different (playing the same note) or the phase maybe, well something was different on each beat, I dont know why, it was like it was "moving", I thought my computer would go belly up or something, could it be that the oscíllators are free running and are not triggered each time it gets a midi note?hakey wrote:Yes, of course, but do you really think that Anubis is as good as (or better than) Synth1?Mac of BIOnighT wrote:That's subjectivehakey wrote: A bit of a step down from Synth1.
A couple of objective differences: the delay on Anubis is a single, mono mode, chorus is one mode with only one control parameter, there's no phaser, no arpeggiator, no fm. And 10,000+ patches vs. 60 or so?
Also, routing a fast env to pitch sweep a sine osc should produce a decent kick - I can only get a weak, flabby thump that varies in volume considerably from one note to the next.

Didn't hear anything, VU meters clipping.??hakey wrote: There seems to be a lot of energy being produced outside of the desired freq range - eg. a patch that doesn't sound all that loud can still be pushing the levels into clipping.
I will have some questions later i suppose glad to know you are willing to help.tattiemannie wrote:I just made a kick in Anubis which is solid
It's already decided - and, as it happens, I haven't got a problem with that either.DeepFiber wrote:Is it decieded that anubis is the one yet? I got no porblem with it I'm just wondering.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026