I want to try a new way of thinking. There's nothing wrong with that.
7/8 Timing Composition Tips?
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 326 posts since 12 Sep, 2008 from Trappe MD
All I wanted to know was how to start using 7/8 timing because it sounded neat and I wanted to expand my horizons and experiment. What's with all the arguing and such? 
I want to try a new way of thinking. There's nothing wrong with that.
I want to try a new way of thinking. There's nothing wrong with that.
GENERATION 30: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
-
- KVRian
- 1084 posts since 12 Sep, 2008 from Your basement
I'd like to apologize for my personal negative message. Can you explain WHY you think that 7/8 meter is neat and not 11/16? Thank you.kajiotaku wrote:All I wanted to know was how to start using 7/8 timing because it sounded neat and I wanted to expand my horizons and experiment. What's with all the arguing and such?
I want to try a new way of thinking. There's nothing wrong with that.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 326 posts since 12 Sep, 2008 from Trappe MD
I heard some 7/8 dubstep and I felt compelled to try it out. It was just on a whim. Also: I never said 11/16 wasn't neat. As far as I can tell I haven't really heard any 11/16 (or at least knew that it was 11/16).Ogg Vorbis wrote:I'd like to apologize for my personal negative message. Can you explain WHY you think that 7/8 meter is neat and not 11/16? Thank you.
GENERATION 30: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
-
- KVRian
- 1084 posts since 12 Sep, 2008 from Your basement
Ah, got it! I am going to have to look up dubstep...kajiotaku wrote:I heard some 7/8 dubstep and I felt compelled to try it out. It was just on a whim. Also: I never said 11/16 wasn't neat. As far as I can tell I haven't really heard any 11/16 (or at least knew that it was 11/16).Ogg Vorbis wrote:I'd like to apologize for my personal negative message. Can you explain WHY you think that 7/8 meter is neat and not 11/16? Thank you.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 326 posts since 12 Sep, 2008 from Trappe MD
Most dubstep is just in 4/4. This is the song I heard:Ogg Vorbis wrote:Ah, got it! I am going to have to look up dubstep...
http://soundcloud.com/altair/outsider-part-1
Nice and smooth...
GENERATION 30: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
-
- KVRian
- 1084 posts since 12 Sep, 2008 from Your basement
Assuming the pulse is quarter notes, I'd call that 7/4. Nice groove actually! It doesn't sound too forced into an odd meter.kajiotaku wrote:Most dubstep is just in 4/4. This is the song I heard:Ogg Vorbis wrote:Ah, got it! I am going to have to look up dubstep...
http://soundcloud.com/altair/outsider-part-1
Nice and smooth...
- KVRAF
- 25015 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
kbaccki wrote: my own musical experience led me to explore the practical aspects of these types of things from a relatively early musical age... odd times, polyrhythms, whatever. OK, so I was listening to Moving Pictures, Stewart Copeland, etc., over and over.
that's the same for me - since I've been nine Genesis was and still is (one of) my most favourite band(s) and I also grew up listening to other prog such as Marillion, Pink Floyd ('money', here's your 7/8 in its most accessible form) Dream Theater, Rush, etc. - that's exactly why I make my points...
- KVRAF
- 25015 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
kajiotaku wrote: As far as I can tell I haven't really heard any 11/16 (or at least knew that it was 11/16).
http://www.prinziphoffnung.com/mp3/frag ... lexity.mp3
Yes, it's age old (2003), but still...
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 326 posts since 12 Sep, 2008 from Trappe MD
That's awesome.jens wrote:http://www.prinziphoffnung.com/mp3/frag ... lexity.mp3
Yes, it's age old (2003), but still...
GENERATION 30: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
-
- KVRist
- 206 posts since 2 Jan, 2010
I realize that you (among others) are trying to help, but, whatever your intent, your original posts come across as the type of academic wankery that says that there is no place for academic wanking and unless you just feel the music you are nothing more than an academic wanker - better if you just happen to randomly find an odd rhythm in your composition and then voilà you finally "got it."jens wrote:
that's the same for me - since I've been nine Genesis was and still is (one of) my most favourite band(s) and I also grew up listening to other prog such as Marillion, Pink Floyd ('money', here's your 7/8 in its most accessible form) Dream Theater, Rush, etc. - that's exactly why I make my points...
This kind of attitude helps no one.
Everybody, at one time or another from Mozart to Benny Goodman to Hendrix to Petrucci, asked questions like the OP and studied and discussed among their peers. The "shut up and play your guitar" idea ignores the fact that Zappa spent decades honing his craft before he wrote "five-five-FIVE."
Sorry, but stuff like 7/8 meter will always require studying it in addition to getting the feel down.
- KVRAF
- 25015 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
yes and no - I absolutely agree that knowledge&theory is good and even often even neccessary.
However I still think that a more open, experimental approach is often the much better way, escpecially when it comes to autodidactic learning.
I still remember vividly that back in the 90s - before the dawn of DAWs - when I came up with a riff or pattern, and upon realizing it wasn't 4/4, I regularly asked the next person around (often my mother) to clap and loudly count for me, in order to be able to specify its time-signature.
So my general advice would be:
take any simple riff you just happen to think up and fool around with it - try to come up with variations, alternations where you leave away notes or add others i.e. try to make the riff shorter or longer - I think jerking
is also important, i.e. let your body explore the rhythm (no, seriously)
However I still think that a more open, experimental approach is often the much better way, escpecially when it comes to autodidactic learning.
I still remember vividly that back in the 90s - before the dawn of DAWs - when I came up with a riff or pattern, and upon realizing it wasn't 4/4, I regularly asked the next person around (often my mother) to clap and loudly count for me, in order to be able to specify its time-signature.
So my general advice would be:
take any simple riff you just happen to think up and fool around with it - try to come up with variations, alternations where you leave away notes or add others i.e. try to make the riff shorter or longer - I think jerking
-
el-bo (formerly ebow) el-bo (formerly ebow) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=208007
- KVRAF
- 17991 posts since 24 May, 2009 from A galaxy, far far away
back-to-back 'tubular bells pt 1', as a kid, is the reason for me NOT being comfortable in 4/4 