NUSofting

Jeremy_NSL · Post by **Jeremy_NSL** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:08 pm

EVE 2.0 suggestions:

- 4th layer slot!

- Seperate amp and filter ADSR (you could use the filter button as a toggle, so you wouldn't need two different ADSR guis)

- as many filter types as you are willing to add, but even just HP would be nice.

-skinable. EVE has a nice gui, but personally the knobs are not my favorite.

-filter cutoff as a destination for lfos

-lfo sync

-lfo pre-delay time (so you can get a vibrato or sweep that fades in)

-more powerful EQ, adds/subtracts greater dB from the signal.

Thats about all I can think of!

jens · Post by **jens** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:36 pm

have I allready mentioned that a siple limiter would be nice?

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:12 pm

[DELETED]

jens · Post by **jens** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:15 pm

ttoz wrote:
jens wrote:have I allready mentioned that a siple limiter would be nice?
yes. i agree actually.

to a 'SIMPLE' as well?

Jeremy_NSL · Post by **Jeremy_NSL** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:18 pm

yeah a limiter would be a nice addition as well. nice for taming 'spikey' patches

oh, and I forgot one other thing: the ability to make our own .dashsnd files. It doesn't have to be anything fancy, even if it just accepts a txt file (like the new Rhino will) that defines the multisample keyrange and velocity range. Command-line is fine with me, though a gui would be even better.

It would be cool for releasing new userbanks - with uncopyrighted samples of course

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:28 pm

[DELETED]

jens · Post by **jens** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:52 pm

ttoz wrote:
jens wrote:
ttoz wrote:
jens wrote:have I allready mentioned that a siple limiter would be nice?
yes. i agree actually.
to a 'SIMPLE' as well?
yeah, like the one in zeta on its output. is that what you mean?

I don't know

- the only RGC products I ever
bought are Triangle 1&2

(though I am really considering Square1

) - what I mean is a simple limiter who only gets rid of some spikes as Floyd allready wrote. You can get them with Eve if eg.
you turn up the filter resonace too much and/or make heavy use of the Leslie-sim or the delay...

I guess we're on the same boat here!?

WilliamK · Post by **WilliamK** » Fri Feb 13, 2004 12:36 am

Guys, I just uploaded to EVE's LOGIN area the BLANK BANK. Just login at http://login.dashsignature.com/ click on "dl.again" next to EVE and you will see the "Blank-Bank.exe" filename...

Wk

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Fri Feb 13, 2004 1:28 am

[DELETED]

liqih · Post by **liqih** » Fri Feb 13, 2004 1:42 am

yes it's an EVE thread and you can't pollute it with
CPU hogs VSTs talking!, (he he, kidding)

BTW limiter is approved and I have the code almost ready

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Fri Feb 13, 2004 2:02 am

[DELETED]

pw · Post by pw » Fri Feb 13, 2004 3:54 am

we are already talking about EVE 2??

The limiter is a great idea, thanks dash guys for being onto it already! I am also with floyd on a few points-

-seperate adsr for amp and filter- can be a toggle when filter is activated.

-more filter types, HP for starters.

-filter cut-off as LFO destination.

and my own suggestion-

- I would like to see a more fully implemented filter section, per part of course

- At least a *dial* each for cut-off and resonance. Those lovely vintage oscillators just beg for it! I think the general consensus is that EVE is CPU friendly at the moment, so I presume most of us would be happy enough to use a bit more CPU as cost for some creamy filters (I hope I don't presume too much).

- I think the three layer slots is definately enough.

NUSofting

KVR Audio

shouldn't eve have at least 32 voice poly since.............