Huh? No saturation used?mcnoone wrote:http://www.box.net/shared/214c43u7tm
http://www.box.net/shared/8kofpf83rv
http://www.box.net/shared/1d00evpmon
...
My examples only used internal eq, comp, and slight reverb.
Zebra Dirty Girl
-
- KVRAF
- 1724 posts since 10 Feb, 2008 from Berlin, Germany
-
- KVRist
- 83 posts since 10 Mar, 2009 from London, UK
Very cool! Sounds like you were channelling Hendrix.mcnoone wrote: Take these examples.
http://www.box.net/shared/214c43u7tm
http://www.box.net/shared/8kofpf83rv
http://www.box.net/shared/1d00evpmon
And the patches were???
When all else fails, read the instruction manual.
-
- KVRist
- 152 posts since 31 Aug, 2010 from Cambridge, Mass.
mcnoone wrote:
Yea okay.
Take these examples.
http://www.box.net/shared/214c43u7tm
http://www.box.net/shared/8kofpf83rv
http://www.box.net/shared/1d00evpmon
Really nice "fingered wankery," and even more impressive programming! I think you and justin3AM have demonstrated some superlatively dirty Zebra. Congratulations to you both.
Yea okay.
Take these examples.
http://www.box.net/shared/214c43u7tm
http://www.box.net/shared/8kofpf83rv
http://www.box.net/shared/1d00evpmon
Really nice "fingered wankery," and even more impressive programming! I think you and justin3AM have demonstrated some superlatively dirty Zebra. Congratulations to you both.
- u-he
- 30216 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Not my best song, but some serious grit I think:
http://www.u-he.com/music/GrittyZ.mp3
(also features an instance of Runciter on the bass though, but the rest is all Zebra)
I think though that an XMF is urgently needed in the FX-grid. That would do a lot
http://www.u-he.com/music/GrittyZ.mp3
(also features an instance of Runciter on the bass though, but the rest is all Zebra)
I think though that an XMF is urgently needed in the FX-grid. That would do a lot
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12053 posts since 12 May, 2008
I like these. Do you have any dirty patch bank available anywhere? I feel like maybe I've downloaded some of your patches before and was impressed.mcnoone wrote:Yea okay.zerocrossing wrote:Urs' synths always have a kind of hi-fi politeness about them and if they have a "weakness" it would be they lean toward "nice" sounds. They can scream and cry.. but if you're looking for raunch... you'd be better off running Zebra into Redoptor or something. IMO, the only modular software that really gets gritty is Vaz.
Take these examples.
http://www.box.net/shared/214c43u7tm
http://www.box.net/shared/8kofpf83rv
http://www.box.net/shared/1d00evpmon
These are too clean or nice in your opinion?
If so...please post your grittiest Vaz patch mp3, so I can see exactly what your trying to describe with very generalized words, and proceed to copy exactly whatever sound you put forth.
Just some fingered wankery will do. Not some sequenced thing or something with external fx.
My examples only used internal eq, comp, and slight reverb.
btw, I tried the Vaz demo, and heard all the mp3 demos.
Sorry but I have yet to hear the raunch and grit you speak of.
I heard a lot of arpeggiator supersaw trance things, and the demo sounded a little thin in the mids imo.
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
No problemUrs wrote:Thanks for the ideas! Again!
It's really going to happen?Urs wrote:Yeah, waveshapers are a big topic for future additions!
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
From my own, not yet released Zebra bank of presets.Prunesquallor wrote: Very cool! Sounds like you were channelling Hendrix.![]()
And the patches were???
- KVRAF
- 18470 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Thin in the mids? I never think that. I do like your examples but I'd never call the first to "raunchy." Dirty, over-driven, yes, but not raunchy. The third one does make me eat my words though, that's pretty damn raunchy. I'll see about creating a few raunchy tones using Vaz but not tonight as I'm picking the miss's up from the airport and that always takes forever.mcnoone wrote:Yea okay.zerocrossing wrote:Urs' synths always have a kind of hi-fi politeness about them and if they have a "weakness" it would be they lean toward "nice" sounds. They can scream and cry.. but if you're looking for raunch... you'd be better off running Zebra into Redoptor or something. IMO, the only modular software that really gets gritty is Vaz.
Take these examples.
http://www.box.net/shared/214c43u7tm
http://www.box.net/shared/8kofpf83rv
http://www.box.net/shared/1d00evpmon
These are too clean or nice in your opinion?
If so...please post your grittiest Vaz patch mp3, so I can see exactly what your trying to describe with very generalized words, and proceed to copy exactly whatever sound you put forth.
Just some fingered wankery will do. Not some sequenced thing or something with external fx.
My examples only used internal eq, comp, and slight reverb.
btw, I tried the Vaz demo, and heard all the mp3 demos.
Sorry but I have yet to hear the raunch and grit you speak of.
I heard a lot of arpeggiator supersaw trance things, and the demo sounded a little thin in the mids imo.
Also, I probably wouldn't even call Vaz my go-to for raunch but I was trying to stay in the modular family. Frankly I'd turn to my MoPho or ATC-1 first. Maybe go to Olga. I remember getting some raunch out of KLC's MS20 and Sawer too.
This isn't meant to be a cut down either. Just a general observation. If I admitted Zebra was perfect in every way how could I justify my ridiculous VST collection?
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ β_β ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ β_β ]~
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
Okay thanks.zerocrossing wrote: Thin in the mids? I never think that. I do like your examples but I'd never call the first to "raunchy." Dirty, over-driven, yes, but not raunchy. The third one does make me eat my words though, that's pretty damn raunchy. I'll see about creating a few raunchy tones using Vaz but not tonight as I'm picking the miss's up from the airport and that always takes forever.
Also, I probably wouldn't even call Vaz my go-to for raunch but I was trying to stay in the modular family. Frankly I'd turn to my MoPho or ATC-1 first. Maybe go to Olga. I remember getting some raunch out of KLC's MS20 and Sawer too.
This isn't meant to be a cut down either. Just a general observation. If I admitted Zebra was perfect in every way how could I justify my ridiculous VST collection?
I was just hoping to get some examples to go with the words, so I can see what direction I could go with to recreate the descriptions. Posting one would be good. Even with Olga or the others would do.
Guess I just like the challenge of trying to get the sounds from Zebra, that are said by many, "can't be done".
I mean raunchy to me, was my telecaster into a rat box, then into a mosfet amp, with my 4x-10" marshall cabinet, but after all I think overdriven, dirty would describe that best.
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
No. 2 of them use internal compressor, eq, and low feedback set reverb.Nokenoku wrote:Huh? No saturation used?
The other one only uses internal reverb.
These, plus another 125+ presets will be available once they are all finished.
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
That song sounds great imo.Urs wrote:Not my best song, but some serious grit I think:
http://www.u-he.com/music/GrittyZ.mp3
(also features an instance of Runciter on the bass though, but the rest is all Zebra)
I think though that an XMF is urgently needed in the FX-grid. That would do a lot
The gritty part works for me too.
I do get confused with the words used in defining certain sounds.
As in those saying "Zebra can't do (adjective)".
Without putting up sound examples.
It makes their point weak, and quite invalid imo.
