MuTools

jamieblac · Post by **jamieblac** » Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:48 pm

MP3 import

> DiGiT < · Post by **> DiGiT <** » Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:20 pm

really? mp3s sound like crap tho... if you own almost any wave editor you can turn an mp3 into a wav and then import to mu.lab

> DiGiT < · Post by **> DiGiT <** » Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:21 pm

liquidsound wrote:It could be useful to be able to have racks in the SMA but not show up in the Racks window (as an option).
This would allow to create additional mixer channels for groups and sends without having a Miracle Mile of racks in the racks window, keeping the essentials visible and the rest in the SMA.
It helps different styles of Mixer templates.

interesting

jamieblac · Post by **jamieblac** » Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:46 pm

One more thing, get rid of the double clicking in the piano roll.

liquidsound · Post by **liquidsound** » Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:43 pm

jamieblac wrote:One more thing, get rid of the double clicking in the piano roll.

I agree but you need to Ctrl+LMB to select then... which I do not mind really.

The rest it's just PERFECT!

MuTools · Post by **MuTools** » Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:54 pm

jamieblac wrote:One more thing, get rid of the double clicking in the piano roll.

Note that you can also [Ctrl]+click to draw new notes.

liquidsound · Post by **liquidsound** » Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:34 pm

So, WHAT'S NEXT???!!!

This forum has reached Theta level.....

janamdo · Post by **janamdo** » Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:17 pm

liquidsound wrote:So, WHAT'S NEXT???!!!

This forum has reached Theta level.....

Waiting on a new release of MUlab ... what the music brings to a more advanced level..

MuTools · Post by **MuTools** » Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:27 pm

liquidsound wrote:So, WHAT'S NEXT???!!!
This forum has reached Theta level.....

Making music?!

And meanwhile the next MU.LAB is being developed

liquidsound · Post by **liquidsound** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:51 am

mutools wrote:And meanwhile the next MU.LAB is being developed

All by yourself ?

Great news anyway

MuTools · Post by **MuTools** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:02 am

liquidsound wrote:
mutools wrote:And meanwhile the next MU.LAB is being developed
All by yourself ?

The MU.LAB project is supported by many people

> DiGiT < · Post by **> DiGiT <** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:02 pm

youre not the only one coding?

liquidsound · Post by **liquidsound** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:51 pm

> DiGiT < wrote:youre not the only one coding?

MuTools · Post by **MuTools** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:31 pm

Coding, yes that's me. Though i try to not to reinvent wheels and code as efficient as possible.

At the same time i also very appreciate (and need!) the support of the skin makers, the patch makers, bug reporters, the people giving conceptual + practical feedback, people giving commercial feedback, ... Without you i am nothing!!

I can understand you're getting a bit impatient about the new MU.LAB version. Too be honnest: i'm impatient about it myself too.

The next MU.LAB will be a nice step forward, no doubt.
Though i'm having some doubts about whether that will be a 3.5 or a 4.0 version.
The good thing about a 3.5 version is that it would be available sooner; but it would contain less new developments than originally wished. A 4.0 version will take longer but will contain more new developments. FYI: A 3.5 version would not yet include multi-core support.

What would be the best way to go, in your opinion?

liquidsound · Post by **liquidsound** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:56 pm

mutools wrote:What would be the best way to go, in your opinion?

As of now, the current version of MuLab has enough tools to manage my music needs at a comfortable level.
I can easily wait for a robust upgrade since I'm doing OK as it is.
Yet, the more the better...

MuTools

KVR Audio

MU.LAB: What's next