iPad 2: The end of the laptop era?
-
- KVRAF
- 1667 posts since 2 Apr, 2006 from Studio City, California
HA Ha - Ipad good for baby apps like garage band - no good for real Pro Daw apps like Hollywood Strings + Cubase/Logic 9. Most if not all default Macbook Pro systems speced with 5400 rpm hard drives ? absolutely low end in pc based systems. Macbook Pro way behind HP 17in Envy with (2) 750 gig 7200 rpm drives and $800 less in price. Macbook Pro = overpriced and lower standard features compared to HP/Dell PC's
Brought to you by the Hall of Sound
http://soundcloud.com/section-d-records
www.soundclick.com/theresistanceband
http://soundcloud.com/section-d-records
www.soundclick.com/theresistanceband
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
Everything depends on your needs. Fortunatly,for my needs the iPad 2 and the gear listed in my sig, makes me think of PC studios as something from the past (to me, that isC-note wrote:HA Ha - Ipad good for baby apps like garage band - no good for real Pro Daw apps like Hollywood Strings + Cubase/Logic 9. Most if not all default Macbook Pro systems speced with 5400 rpm hard drives ? absolutely low end in pc based systems. Macbook Pro way behind HP 17in Envy with (2) 750 gig 7200 rpm drives and $800 less in price. Macbook Pro = overpriced and lower standard features compared to HP/Dell PC's
I just want t make some decent hobby music, so I'll leave the PC (and the hardware) to the professional studios.
-
- KVRian
- 1392 posts since 1 May, 2010
Ipad for me is for live performance. Those touch osc combined with logic and nerve are a god send for live effect. But for serious music production, it's not that efficient, it takes longer time to make a song in ipad compared to normal DAW.
musisikamar.com
-
- KVRAF
- 1966 posts since 22 Mar, 2002 from Timisoara, Romania
not really 
ipad it's not so good experience for me.
90 % of music software on ipad is half baked or crashes.
or both
not many audio coders ( or big players like NI or Steinberg ) take it seriously.
and so on ...
the hardware is quite good but the software ... after you worked so many years with a pc or a mac - it looks like unfinished toys
still -(so far) as a osc / midi controller is ACE
ipad it's not so good experience for me.
90 % of music software on ipad is half baked or crashes.
or both
not many audio coders ( or big players like NI or Steinberg ) take it seriously.
and so on ...
the hardware is quite good but the software ... after you worked so many years with a pc or a mac - it looks like unfinished toys
still -(so far) as a osc / midi controller is ACE
__Makunouchi Bento
http://makunouchibento.bandcamp.com
http://makunouchibento.bandcamp.com
-
- KVRAF
- 2875 posts since 28 Jan, 2004 from Da Nang, Vietnam
I agree. Some of the iPad music apps like Nanostudio are impressive but I have to admit that none of them have really become useful music tools for me. Other novel noisemakers are fun for a while but when I have things like Reaktor's Metaphysical Function two clicks away on my Macbook they all look pretty gimmicky in comparison.xamido wrote:Ipad for me is for live performance.
The iPad makes a great controller, but the problem there is that this is really a niche market. The number of people that have an iPad *and* know how to rig up midi is small, so IMO this isn't really a very attractive area for a developer to work in.
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
Sad and strange. I have only experienced a few chrashes with my gear, both on my iPad 2 and iPod Touch. Which apps are you running?wakax wrote:ipad it's not so good experience for me.
90 % of music software on ipad is half baked or crashes.
or both
But those who do take it seriously do indeed continually update their software with new features and improvementswakax wrote: not many audio coders ( or big players like NI or Steinberg ) take it seriously.
and so on ...
Cheers
- KVRian
- 1209 posts since 6 Aug, 2005 from albuquerque NM
You can do wireless MIDI with some of the apps that are available - but there isn't really a proper DAW for the ipad yet. Garageband isn't there, and the others don't do everything you need in a DAW.smokyfrog wrote:Simple question: does anyone know of an iPad "DAW" that sends or receives MIDI clock?
Cheers
I really hope that ipads aren't the "end" of the laptop era. The ipad is cool and all, and I like mine, but I can't say that I'll ever see myself using it for ALL of my production work. I don't want to be forced into it, either. The fact that Apple is releasing the next iteration of Final Cut as an app download on the app store is utter garbage, to me. It means they're watering down their applications to make them palatable to the masses, nothing more. I'm glad they know how to monetize, that's great and all... but some of us have real work to get done.
..::*Jack of all DAWs* brianbotkiller.com : OBEDIA.com::..
-
el-bo (formerly ebow) el-bo (formerly ebow) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=208007
- KVRAF
- 17998 posts since 24 May, 2009 from A galaxy, far far away
nope, it all comes down to training and personal preference...a key-mouse combo might be much faster for competitive fragging, but i've grown up playing console games, relaxing on sofas with friends who are actually sitting next to meNokenoku wrote:It isn't.IncarnateX wrote:...Nokenoku wrote:A Shooter for example is best played with mouse+keyboard, not touchpad or gamepad.
It all comes down to training and personal preferences. And that I believe to be a universal and quite trivial fact.
A shooter is best played with mouse+keyboard. THAT is a fact.
You will never ever find a person on gamepad, who could compete with a good mouse-player.
all of this is preferable to sitting hunched over a screen with worsening rsi symptoms (i've had 2 operations for carpal tunnel)
i know i wouldn't last a second, online (i know, i've tried), but i don't care...it's not what i'm interested in ...therefore, what is BEST for me is xbox 360 pad compatibility which many pc game developers are still too short-sighted to cater for
-
penguinfromdeep penguinfromdeep https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=193898
- KVRAF
- 1994 posts since 18 Nov, 2008
If it's available as download on app store, how is it watering down the application? I see it more as a convenience. Anybody could've bought Final Cut before too, not just the pro's. The app is still very powerful, they're not cutting down on the features now are theybotkiller wrote:
The fact that Apple is releasing the next iteration of Final Cut as an app download on the app store is utter garbage, to me. It means they're watering down their applications to make them palatable to the masses, nothing more.
circuit modeling and 0-dfb filters are cool
-
- KVRian
- 621 posts since 5 Aug, 2002 from United States
The key here is app development and maturity. Windows/OSX have been around 25 years. The iPad has been out 1 year. What amazes me is how good it already is. I can seriously see that when iPad 5 comes out, I may no longer have any need for a PC at all. It has already replaced my netbook, Nintendo DS, Sony eReader, laptop, and 90% of what I do on my desktop. The only thing really left that I use my desktop for is photoshop and some music.....
It depends on your needs. Just because because a studio has hardware pro mixers, effects, etc does not mean you can't make music at home on your computer. And just because the iPad does not have duel monitors, and a quad core, does not mean you can't make music on it.....
It depends on your needs. Just because because a studio has hardware pro mixers, effects, etc does not mean you can't make music at home on your computer. And just because the iPad does not have duel monitors, and a quad core, does not mean you can't make music on it.....
Dell desktop Win 10 /2012 MacBook Pro
Cubase Pro 10/Mixcraft 9
Cubase Pro 10/Mixcraft 9
-
- KVRer
- 5 posts since 5 May, 2010
Actually, the most important thing is understanding how circuits work. For example the role of the capacitor in an analogue envelope appears unknown to many creators of software versions...penguinfromdeep wrote:botkiller wrote: Developers! Developers! Your plug-ins should be circuit modeled!!! It's the shizzz! Also don't forget oversampling!
Sorry, totally OT of course.
-
- KVRian
- 1452 posts since 9 Feb, 2007 from San Ramon, California
What about the Intel Ultrabook concept?
Ultrabook
More on ultrabook
It appears that Intel is trying to make a statement that it thinks it is possible to squeeze more performance out of a tablet-like thing without taxing the battery life too much or generating significantly more heat. I do not think it is possible to get something close to the performance of a Core i7-based lap top, but there is probably much more performance to squeeze out of a tablet, especially if you are willing to accept a cut in battery life by a factor of two or even a factor of 5 and replace your laptop with it (with a smaller-sized battery - not the big stand-like thing - my HP engineering notebook gets only about an hour or so of life). I think this is especially true for the casual user who does not expect a significant computational device. Intel is naturally trying to compete to get its chips into more mobile devices and time will tell what sort of real performance can be attained.
However for rendering multiple audio tracks, running modern software synthesizers like DCAM, Omnisphere, Alchemy, Largo, etc., I am just not so sure that the tablets are going to catch up any time soon.
Ultrabook
More on ultrabook
It appears that Intel is trying to make a statement that it thinks it is possible to squeeze more performance out of a tablet-like thing without taxing the battery life too much or generating significantly more heat. I do not think it is possible to get something close to the performance of a Core i7-based lap top, but there is probably much more performance to squeeze out of a tablet, especially if you are willing to accept a cut in battery life by a factor of two or even a factor of 5 and replace your laptop with it (with a smaller-sized battery - not the big stand-like thing - my HP engineering notebook gets only about an hour or so of life). I think this is especially true for the casual user who does not expect a significant computational device. Intel is naturally trying to compete to get its chips into more mobile devices and time will tell what sort of real performance can be attained.
However for rendering multiple audio tracks, running modern software synthesizers like DCAM, Omnisphere, Alchemy, Largo, etc., I am just not so sure that the tablets are going to catch up any time soon.
------------------------------------------
Gribs
Gribs
-
- KVRian
- 1122 posts since 12 Mar, 2005
HP's consumer stuff is junk though. Actually, so is their business line. If you're going to talk about PC's, at least refer to GOOD PC's.C-note wrote:HA Ha - Ipad good for baby apps like garage band - no good for real Pro Daw apps like Hollywood Strings + Cubase/Logic 9. Most if not all default Macbook Pro systems speced with 5400 rpm hard drives ? absolutely low end in pc based systems. Macbook Pro way behind HP 17in Envy with (2) 750 gig 7200 rpm drives and $800 less in price. Macbook Pro = overpriced and lower standard features compared to HP/Dell PC's
And whining about something that costs $50-$100 to easily replace is just that; whining. I've never kept a stock drive in ANY computer I've got, be it Mac, Windows, or Linux.
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
Last year I started this thread for the fun of it. Now I have just realised that there actually are people who believe that the iPad will destroy the laptop market. Just look at this report:
http://www.benzinga.com/news/12/01/2270 ... top-market
So here is a splendid opportunity for some iPad versus PC action.
Discuss, troll, offend etc.
http://www.benzinga.com/news/12/01/2270 ... top-market
So here is a splendid opportunity for some iPad versus PC action.
Discuss, troll, offend etc.