KVR Audio

lament77 · Post by **lament77** » Thu Mar 04, 2004 8:02 am

yep, i too love this filter bank. one of, if not the best filter plugs in my possesion.

rsmus7 · Post by **rsmus7** » Thu Mar 04, 2004 8:37 am

Thank you for this plugin

I just had a few minutes to try, but it is really wonderfull, as far as I could see/hear

One of the best filters I ever tried.

If there will be no GUI, maybe we could set up a donation for reFX or/and a "GUI-maker"?

Hope you at reFX will make more of such nice plugins.
And I will give Trasher a try as soon as possible.

Sahul · Post by **Sahul** » Thu Mar 04, 2004 8:49 am

there are quite a few synth/effect skinners on this website.. most of which would probably do the work for free

Count on me for this one... This filter sounds wicked with pads, it really deserves a GUI.

Sahul

landstrum77 · Post by **landstrum77** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 2:18 pm

well after a few more days of using this filter im hooked. i put it up againtst filters that arent free and this thing rocks,thick sound,i just hope that it gets released somehow,a few of my friends have tried it also and flipped! thxx!

mystahr · Post by **mystahr** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 2:49 pm

landstrum77 wrote:well after a few more days of using this filter im hooked. i put it up againtst filters that arent free and this thing rocks,thick sound,i just hope that it gets released somehow,a few of my friends have tried it also and flipped! thxx!

But you have it allready

I have worked with it too, and I don't mind the non-gui thing. It is sound first and foremost isn't it?

This is one of the best FX that found my folder recently. Thanks Michael

(and as for non-gui; the MDA series is like that too, and we use that too, or well at least it shows in quite a few of my own tunes)

soma · Post by **soma** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 2:59 pm

I'd rather not have a GUI. But I wish it had a few bugs fixed? I get some noise bursts.

topaz · Post by **topaz** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:11 pm

just wondering why it uses 8 to 10% cpu doing nothing

a way to put unused FX in sleep mode would be cool.

sounds great

luCiPHer · Post by **luCiPHer** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:13 pm

jesus, this thing is GREAT!

thanks markus, big thanks

i'm no pro, but u could create some gui-graphics as well

squeller · Post by **squeller** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:14 pm

topaz wrote:just wondering why it uses 8 to 10% cpu doing nothing
a way to put unused FX in sleep mode would be cool.

Its a hosts job. FL does (called smart disable)

topaz · Post by **topaz** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:17 pm

no what I mean is it uses 8 to 10% just loaded here on a AMD2000+

squuq wrote:
topaz wrote:just wondering why it uses 8 to 10% cpu doing nothing
a way to put unused FX in sleep mode would be cool.
Its a hosts job. FL does (called smart disable)

meister eder · Post by **meister eder** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:31 pm

topaz wrote:no what I mean is it uses 8 to 10% just loaded here on a AMD2000+

Its a hosts job to temporarily disable unused plugins. Logic does.

topaz · Post by **topaz** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:34 pm

ok, in plain English.

it uses 8 to 10% cpu on my 2000+ .

dr.wackler wrote:
topaz wrote:no what I mean is it uses 8 to 10% just loaded here on a AMD2000+
Its a hosts job to temporarily disable unused plugins. Logic does.

meister eder · Post by **meister eder** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:44 pm

topaz wrote:ok, in plain English.

it uses 8 to 10% cpu on my 2000+ .

Funny how your sentence becomes shorter and shorter with each reply.
From
"just wondering why it uses 8 to 10% cpu doing nothing
a way to put unused FX in sleep mode would be cool"
over
"no what I mean is it uses 8 to 10% just loaded here on a AMD2000+"
to
"it uses 8 to 10% cpu on my 2000+".

And again my answer in as plain English as a non-native English speakers English could be: It's a host's job (to put unused FX in sleep mode, no matter what CPU you're on and how much CPU it uses).

topaz · Post by **topaz** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:49 pm

or it could also mean that all the delays, lfo,s etc are on all the time and a way to turn them off in patches that dont need them would be cool.

anyway, he said it development has stopped so thats the way things are.

dr.wackler wrote:
topaz wrote:ok, in plain English.

it uses 8 to 10% cpu on my 2000+ .
Funny how your sentence becomes shorter and shorter with each reply.
From
"just wondering why it uses 8 to 10% cpu doing nothing
a way to put unused FX in sleep mode would be cool"
over
"no what I mean is it uses 8 to 10% just loaded here on a AMD2000+"
to
"it uses 8 to 10% cpu on my 2000+".

And again my answer in as plain English as a non-native English speakers English could be: It's a host's job (to put unused FX in sleep mode, no matter what CPU you're on and how much CPU it uses).

meister eder · Post by **meister eder** » Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:55 pm

topaz wrote:or it could also mean that all the delays, lfo,s etc are on all the time and a way to turn them off in patches that dont need them would be cool.

Free 4 download: Obertone Filterbank