KVR Audio

Photo_G · Post by **Photo_G** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:40 pm

It sure is. Will the frequency display be more granular (more bands), and more responsive than the current version? I'd love to see a screenshot with the spectrum display shown.

Thanks,
G

GeorgeZ · Post by **GeorgeZ** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:54 pm

Love that Steven. Really looking sharp with the colours on the numbers instead of the knobs in the EQ section. One question, I know we'll be able to drag the EQ nodes, but are there any thoughts of setting up a mouse function for setting the Q via the nodes? I.E. crtl+drag up = widening Q; crtl+drag down= narrowing Q (obviously not actually crtl+click, cause I'd imagine that crtl+click on anything will return it to it's default values, including the nodes... crtl+ was just an example

).

topaz · Post by **topaz** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:18 pm

please remove the http click link on the UI, this can be placed in a sub menu.

Nielzie · Post by **Nielzie** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:30 pm

Looking good!

kurrykid · Post by **kurrykid** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:58 pm

That is a great looking interface...I'm looking forward to it!

DNR Collaborative · Post by **DNR Collaborative** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:05 am

topaz wrote:please remove the http click link on the UI, this can be placed in a sub menu.

I'm not fully sure I understand this comment. Could you explain please? Do you mean on the image or the actual UI itself?

Steven

GeorgeZ · Post by **GeorgeZ** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:19 am

He doesn't want to "accidentally" click anywhere on the GUI (including the logos etc) and get sent to the website. He wants the redirect to the website to be located in a menu... if I understand his post correctly.

DNR Collaborative · Post by **DNR Collaborative** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:27 pm

GeorgeZ wrote:He doesn't want to "accidentally" click anywhere on the GUI (including the logos etc) and get sent to the website. He wants the redirect to the website to be located in a menu... if I understand his post correctly.

Ah, another good call - I'll add this to the list even if it wasn't what he meant

Steven

lotus2035 · Post by **lotus2035** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:27 pm

I'm in! (by the skin of my teeth).
Thank you for this great offer.

christianmusicmaker · Post by **christianmusicmaker** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:51 pm

Photo_G wrote:It sure is. Will the frequency display be more granular (more bands), and more responsive than the current version? I'd love to see a screenshot with the spectrum display shown.

Thanks,
G

Looks great yes. I would also like to find out if the Spectrum display will be more responsive in the new version. It just seems to lag slightly behind the input and output meters at times in the current version.

DNR Collaborative · Post by **DNR Collaborative** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:29 pm

I will respond to the spectrum analyzer questions shortly, but first, if anyone DOES NOT yet see MixControl in their user account, please let me know.

As for the spectrum analyzer, currently there is a lag in the visual feedback due to (from my understanding) a hard-coded FFT block size, but I am awaiting information on what changes will be made to allow users to change the size themselves. I will post more infomation later on today with updated info.

And for those looking for a wet/dry control in the gate - in will be included, barring any unforeseen issues with it's inclusion.

Steven

christianmusicmaker · Post by **christianmusicmaker** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:58 pm

DNR Collaborative wrote:As for the spectrum analyzer, currently there is a lag in the visual feedback due to (from my understanding) a hard-coded FFT block size, but I am awaiting information on what changes will be made to allow users to change the size themselves. I will post more infomation later on today with updated info.

Steven

Thanks for the response and clarification.

lotus2035 · Post by **lotus2035** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:51 pm

My license isn't being accepted by the plug. Sent a mail off to support.

DNR Collaborative · Post by **DNR Collaborative** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:31 pm

lotus2035 wrote:My license isn't being accepted by the plug. Sent a mail off to support.

You should be all set now

Also, for those of you using x64 versions of MixControl, there is a bug which will be addressed in the next update which prevents the x64 version from authorizing properly. There is a very simple workaround:

1. Install the 32-bit version and authorize it in the same fashion.
2. Once authorized, the 32-bit version can be removed completely.
3. x64 version will stay authorized properly.

It apparently does not happen to each x64 system, but quite sporadically. Again, it will be addressed in the new version and this workaround has worked for everyone experiencing the issue.

If there are any other bugs that you encounter, please submit them to us as soon as possible. We would like to make sure that it is bug-free and rock solid upon release.

Steven

3ee · Post by **3ee** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:53 pm

My authorisation was a bit different as well.
Don't know if it is this way but just posting to let others that might have the same authorisation routine know.

The DNR website linked me to a code that I've copy-pasted into a .txt file renaming "MixControl License.license" instead of "MixControl License.txt" and than imported via the plugin's UI.

Installed on WIN XP SP2 32-bit vst.

MixControl Pro (Group Buy Started)