Is it going to?Anjey_Olaf wrote:No OSX.szalonykp wrote:No OSX?
Once synthmaker will support OSX, version to appear immediately for OSX.
Anjey Olaf.
New VST Synthesizer CELL
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Fernando (FMR)
-
- KVRAF
- 2973 posts since 10 Sep, 2003 from Karlskoga, Stockholm, Sweden
Sounds good! 
- KVRian
- 1275 posts since 10 Oct, 2002 from Barcelona
- KVRAF
- 19787 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
Rodney888 wrote:In education I m Software Engineer so complexities don't have arisen from the technical side.
I can't imagine any reason for a software engineer to use Synthmaker....but good luck with this project anyway.........Anjey_Olaf wrote:Once synthmaker will support OSX,
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- KVRAF
- 9589 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
I can think of several but then again i can think of several reasons not to.Teksonik wrote:Rodney888 wrote:In education I m Software Engineer so complexities don't have arisen from the technical side.I can't imagine any reason for a software engineer to use Synthmaker....Anjey_Olaf wrote:Once synthmaker will support OSX,
-
- KVRist
- 139 posts since 10 Feb, 2011
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 57 posts since 27 Oct, 2011
and what reasons?Teksonik wrote:Rodney888 wrote:In education I m Software Engineer so complexities don't have arisen from the technical side.I can't imagine any reason for a software engineer to use Synthmaker....but good luck with this project anyway.........Anjey_Olaf wrote:Once synthmaker will support OSX,
-
- KVRist
- 98 posts since 31 Oct, 2011
Synthmaker platform for experimentation and Research and is also suitable for Export the finished result, not a problem to transfer the algorithm in C + +.Teksonik wrote:Rodney888 wrote:In education I m Software Engineer so complexities don't have arisen from the technical side.I can't imagine any reason for a software engineer to use Synthmaker....but good luck with this project anyway.........Anjey_Olaf wrote:Once synthmaker will support OSX,
Access Virus FAN
-
- KVRist
- 98 posts since 31 Oct, 2011
Without simulation programming is very difficult, especially when you do not see, and not too off the result, simulation and experimentation Synthmaker fits much better than C + +. Then the finished result is not a problem to port at least for a DSP processor.jupiter8 wrote:I can think of several but then again i can think of several reasons not to.Teksonik wrote:Rodney888 wrote:In education I m Software Engineer so complexities don't have arisen from the technical side.I can't imagine any reason for a software engineer to use Synthmaker....Anjey_Olaf wrote:Once synthmaker will support OSX,
Access Virus FAN
-
- KVRist
- 98 posts since 31 Oct, 2011
For your information supports a low-level programming Synthmaker than I used to the fullest.
Access Virus FAN
- KVRAF
- 2158 posts since 11 Oct, 2007 from Almanya
The demos sound good enough for me to want it. Sadly (not for me), I've recently moved onto a Mac for music production (no regrets, BTW).
So be sure to announce when you've ported it to C++ and made it available for Mac.
So be sure to announce when you've ported it to C++ and made it available for Mac.
Reaper user? Get my free JSFX plug-ins, also available via ReaPack extension.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 57 posts since 27 Oct, 2011
thanks man!we will let you know about itchokehold wrote:The demos sound good enough for me to want it. Sadly (not for me), I've recently moved onto a Mac for music production (no regrets, BTW).
So be sure to announce when you've ported it to C++ and made it available for Mac.
-
- KVRAF
- 6323 posts since 30 Dec, 2004 from London uk
The supersaw sound has been done to death, quite succesfully in some cases. Apparently, its the unique FX that make the Virus sound, no one has that nailed yet 
