Just checked it and there is almost no difference in CPU use compared to "great" quality. I got up to 56% for a 3 note Synth Strings patch (with OTA ladder filter) where i got around 55% with "great" quality (including playing fast note, less for playing slow). With "fast" quality it goes down to 35% and 25% with "draft" quality.pdxindy wrote:Ingonator wrote:Up to 30% for a monophonic patch (with transistor ladder filter) and 40% for a 3 norte Synth Brass chord (with OTA ladder filter) at "great" quality here using a Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4 x 2.4 GHz) CPU. A Synth Strings patch with 3 notes and the OTA ladder filter is around 50-55%. The biggest CPU killer is the multimode /SVF filter with up to 70% for 3 notes. With "Draft" quality/accuracy this goes down to around 23%. The "accuracy" (=quality) setting is at the right part of the Master section of Diva.justin3am wrote:Depends on the patch but that doesn't sound like a bug to me. I can use 50% of a core with just two notes on my i7 laptop. DIva is CPU hungry. I'm actually pleasantly surprised that it's not as CPU hungry as I thought it would be.breakmixer wrote:CPU through the roof even on a 3 note chord, Cubase 5.1. W7 Dual Core 32bit. Seems unusable for me atm, sound breaking up, scratchy/distorted...
If you want more info - tell me what you need!
Like already mentioned it's no surprise that Diva is CPU hungry but with lower quality settings (e.g. "fast") it should be usable on slower systems.
Ingo
great is great, but divine is better
With "divine" quality and the multimode/SVF filter it goes up to 133% !! for the same preset. For chords I could only use the multimode filter at a "fast" quality setting. With the Transistor ladder filter it's around 72% at the same preset and "great" quality.
Ingo
