Diva Vs. Real Analog

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Locked New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Diva$209.00Buy

Post

PietW. wrote:
chacka wrote:
PietW. wrote:This X vs.Y is so boring and so unnecessary.
Really? Then why do you care?
Because nobody needs such threads. :x
Praising Diva is almost as enjoyable as playing it. :)

Post

+1 :)
My question is can Diva be praised without having to compare it to hardware in order to validate the great sound it has? I think it sounds terrific but the need to compare it to hardware.... 8)

If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?

Post

PietW. wrote:
chacka wrote:
PietW. wrote:This X vs.Y is so boring and so unnecessary.
Really? Then why do you care?
Because nobody needs such threads. :x
Obviously you need it. Otherwise you wouldn't participate in it. :)

Post

dsynth27 wrote:If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
Where something is a more-or-less explicit emulation, comparisons with that which is emulated are unavoidable. :shrug:

Post

chacka wrote:
PietW. wrote:
chacka wrote:
PietW. wrote:This X vs.Y is so boring and so unnecessary.
Really? Then why do you care?
Because nobody needs such threads. :x
Obviously you need it. Otherwise you wouldn't participate in it. :)
:lol: :lol:

I can see the point, somewhat.

But it does sound really good, so, maybe...?

I have a few real analogues here, Arp2600, Minimoog, SH101, + a pile more....+ I also do have a pile of VA's as well...
Barry
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing

Post

hakey wrote:
dsynth27 wrote:If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
Where something is a more-or-less explicit emulation, comparisons with that which is emulated are unavoidable. :shrug:
My question is can Diva be praised without having to compare it to hardware in order to validate the great sound it has? I think it sounds terrific but the need to compare it to hardware.... Cool

If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?

Post

pdxindy wrote:I haven't tried Synthix because it is dongled
It doesn't require a physical dongle - it's elicenser or something.

That said, as a generic emulation of the analogue sound, Diva absolutely kills it.

Fact. ;)

Post

Hmm let's take a look at synths released in 2011:
- Dmitry Sches Diversion
- Audio Damage Phosphor
- Cakewalk Z3TA+ 2
- Image-Line Harmor
- discoDSP Corona
- G-Force ImpOSCar 2
- XILS-lab Synthix
- Tone2 ElectraX
- Hamburg-Audio Nuklear
- Diva

maybe some additional one or two I forgot.

Is there something hmm unusual ? Hmm Nuklear ?
Is there something solid, good/great product ? ElectraX (digital world), Synthix (analog world)
Is there something unexpected ? well, for me it was Diversion

But which one synth shines when it comes to sound quality ? Diva. Other synths are so 2011, Diva is the only one which (in the terms of sound quality) fits 2012 :D and Im not a fanboy, im actually angry that beta virtually killed my desktop core2duo which (heavily overclocked) is good enough for everything but not for sound quality I guess hehe :hihi:

who knows, maybe it's time to stop buying plugins and buy another computer or do some very serious upgrade.
Last edited by D N A on Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

dsynth27 wrote:If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark
It isn't.

Post

D N A wrote:Hmm let's take a look at synths released in 2011:
- Dmitry Sches Diversion
- Audio Damage Phosphor
- Cakewalk Z3TA+ 2
- Image-Line Harmor
- discoDSP Corona
- G-Force ImpOSCar 2
- XILS-lab Synthix
- Tone2 ElectraX
- Hamburg-Audio Nuklear
- Diva

maybe some additional one or two I forgot.

Is there something hmm unusual ? Hmm Nuklear ?
Is there something solid, good/great product ? ElectraX (digital world), Synthix (analog world)
Is there something unexpected ? well, for me it was Diversion

But which one synth shines when it comes to sound quality ? Diva. Other synths are so 2011, Diva is the only one which (in the terms of sound quality) fits 2012 :D and Im not a fanboy, im actually angry that beta virtually killed my desktop core2duo which (heavily overclocked) is good enough for everything but not for sound quality I guess hehe :hihi:

who knows, maybe it's time to stop buying plugins and buy another computer or do some very serious upgrade.
:D
Nice...I think it makes more sense to compare it with other software synths and not hardware (that is just my opinion - no offense :wink: ).

How would everyone compare Diva to the other software instrument that everyone agrees sounds outstanding - Omnisphere? I know there are differences but based on similar analog type sounds.... 8)

Post

hakey wrote:
dsynth27 wrote:My question is can Diva be praised without having to compare it to hardware in order to validate the great sound it has? I think it sounds terrific but the need to compare it to hardware.... Cool

If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
It isn't.
ok - "why is it the benchmark the majority of the time?"... not to mention the original question is Diva vs. Real Analog. I like how you elaborate :P
Last edited by dsynth27 on Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:52 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Post

pdxindy wrote:I haven't tried Synthix because it is dongled,
The demo is dongle free.
pdxindy wrote:The thing I learned from the gearslutz discussion about Diva is there is variation from Minimoog to Minimoog. Urs modeled a specific Minimoog and so there are characteristics in Diva from that specific one and someone might have their own Minimoog and say that Diva does not get the sound exactly the same as theirs.
Yes, MiniMoogs are like guitars. Pick up one Strat and compare it to another one. Both are unmistakably Strats but different.
All MiniMoogs I played myself sounded unmistakingly like Minis. Same for all Minis I saw other people play or the ones that I heard on certain recordings.
And the opposite happened with that Synthex emu. It simply didn't give me that WOW factor the Synthex I played and the other ones I heard people play. The real one is a monster while what I heard from the emu is rather tame.

Post

dsynth27 wrote:If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
hakey wrote:It isn't.
ok - "why is it the benchmark the majority of the time?"... not to mention the original question is Diva vs. Real Analog. I like how you elaborate :P
Okay, some elaboration: it isn't even the benchmark the majority of the time.

Post

dsynth27 wrote: ok - "why is it the benchmark the majority of the time?"... not to mention the original question is Diva vs. Real Analog.
I use One Ping Only as my benchmark of superior sound quality.
We can clearly hear.
It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that pinggggggggggggggggg!

Post

dsynth27 wrote:
hakey wrote:
dsynth27 wrote:My question is can Diva be praised without having to compare it to hardware in order to validate the great sound it has? I think it sounds terrific but the need to compare it to hardware.... Cool

If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
It isn't.
ok - "why is it the benchmark the majority of the time?"... not to mention the original question is Diva vs. Real Analog. I like how you elaborate :P
I think it 'becomes' a benchmark when someone wants to compare the sound of a VA with the analogue synth. There can be some hint of nostalgia for the real analogue synth compared to what is perceived as an authentic VA-or not. Just depends.

I'm more eclectic in that it matters not whether it comes out of my Minimoog or a VA of it...they are sounds that I can mange using onboard..or-off board effects.... :)
Barry
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing

Locked

Return to “Instruments”