Praising Diva is almost as enjoyable as playing it.PietW. wrote:Because nobody needs such threads.chacka wrote:Really? Then why do you care?PietW. wrote:This X vs.Y is so boring and so unnecessary.
Diva Vs. Real Analog
-
- KVRian
- 1355 posts since 27 Oct, 2009
-
- KVRist
- 187 posts since 16 Aug, 2011
+1
My question is can Diva be praised without having to compare it to hardware in order to validate the great sound it has? I think it sounds terrific but the need to compare it to hardware....
If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
My question is can Diva be praised without having to compare it to hardware in order to validate the great sound it has? I think it sounds terrific but the need to compare it to hardware....
If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
-
- KVRAF
- 1888 posts since 13 Aug, 2011 from Berlin
Obviously you need it. Otherwise you wouldn't participate in it.PietW. wrote:Because nobody needs such threads.chacka wrote:Really? Then why do you care?PietW. wrote:This X vs.Y is so boring and so unnecessary.
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Where something is a more-or-less explicit emulation, comparisons with that which is emulated are unavoidable.dsynth27 wrote:If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
-
- KVRAF
- 16977 posts since 23 Jun, 2010 from north of London ON
chacka wrote:Obviously you need it. Otherwise you wouldn't participate in it.PietW. wrote:Because nobody needs such threads.chacka wrote:Really? Then why do you care?PietW. wrote:This X vs.Y is so boring and so unnecessary.
I can see the point, somewhat.
But it does sound really good, so, maybe...?
I have a few real analogues here, Arp2600, Minimoog, SH101, + a pile more....+ I also do have a pile of VA's as well...
Barry
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing
-
- KVRist
- 187 posts since 16 Aug, 2011
My question is can Diva be praised without having to compare it to hardware in order to validate the great sound it has? I think it sounds terrific but the need to compare it to hardware.... Coolhakey wrote:Where something is a more-or-less explicit emulation, comparisons with that which is emulated are unavoidable.dsynth27 wrote:If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
It doesn't require a physical dongle - it's elicenser or something.pdxindy wrote:I haven't tried Synthix because it is dongled
That said, as a generic emulation of the analogue sound, Diva absolutely kills it.
Fact.
-
- KVRian
- 1074 posts since 1 Jan, 2004
Hmm let's take a look at synths released in 2011:
- Dmitry Sches Diversion
- Audio Damage Phosphor
- Cakewalk Z3TA+ 2
- Image-Line Harmor
- discoDSP Corona
- G-Force ImpOSCar 2
- XILS-lab Synthix
- Tone2 ElectraX
- Hamburg-Audio Nuklear
- Diva
maybe some additional one or two I forgot.
Is there something hmm unusual ? Hmm Nuklear ?
Is there something solid, good/great product ? ElectraX (digital world), Synthix (analog world)
Is there something unexpected ? well, for me it was Diversion
But which one synth shines when it comes to sound quality ? Diva. Other synths are so 2011, Diva is the only one which (in the terms of sound quality) fits 2012
and Im not a fanboy, im actually angry that beta virtually killed my desktop core2duo which (heavily overclocked) is good enough for everything but not for sound quality I guess hehe 
who knows, maybe it's time to stop buying plugins and buy another computer or do some very serious upgrade.
- Dmitry Sches Diversion
- Audio Damage Phosphor
- Cakewalk Z3TA+ 2
- Image-Line Harmor
- discoDSP Corona
- G-Force ImpOSCar 2
- XILS-lab Synthix
- Tone2 ElectraX
- Hamburg-Audio Nuklear
- Diva
maybe some additional one or two I forgot.
Is there something hmm unusual ? Hmm Nuklear ?
Is there something solid, good/great product ? ElectraX (digital world), Synthix (analog world)
Is there something unexpected ? well, for me it was Diversion
But which one synth shines when it comes to sound quality ? Diva. Other synths are so 2011, Diva is the only one which (in the terms of sound quality) fits 2012
who knows, maybe it's time to stop buying plugins and buy another computer or do some very serious upgrade.
Last edited by D N A on Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soundbanks: Sylenth, V-Station, Z3TA+, Toxic Biohazard - good EDM Soundbanks
VST Cafe - music production blog
VST Cafe - music production blog
-
- KVRist
- 187 posts since 16 Aug, 2011
D N A wrote:Hmm let's take a look at synths released in 2011:
- Dmitry Sches Diversion
- Audio Damage Phosphor
- Cakewalk Z3TA+ 2
- Image-Line Harmor
- discoDSP Corona
- G-Force ImpOSCar 2
- XILS-lab Synthix
- Tone2 ElectraX
- Hamburg-Audio Nuklear
- Diva
maybe some additional one or two I forgot.
Is there something hmm unusual ? Hmm Nuklear ?
Is there something solid, good/great product ? ElectraX (digital world), Synthix (analog world)
Is there something unexpected ? well, for me it was Diversion
But which one synth shines when it comes to sound quality ? Diva. Other synths are so 2011, Diva is the only one which (in the terms of sound quality) fits 2012and Im not a fanboy, im actually angry that beta virtually killed my desktop core2duo which (heavily overclocked) is good enough for everything but not for sound quality I guess hehe
who knows, maybe it's time to stop buying plugins and buy another computer or do some very serious upgrade.
Nice...I think it makes more sense to compare it with other software synths and not hardware (that is just my opinion - no offense
How would everyone compare Diva to the other software instrument that everyone agrees sounds outstanding - Omnisphere? I know there are differences but based on similar analog type sounds....
-
- KVRist
- 187 posts since 16 Aug, 2011
ok - "why is it the benchmark the majority of the time?"... not to mention the original question is Diva vs. Real Analog. I like how you elaboratehakey wrote:It isn't.dsynth27 wrote:My question is can Diva be praised without having to compare it to hardware in order to validate the great sound it has? I think it sounds terrific but the need to compare it to hardware.... Cool
If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
Last edited by dsynth27 on Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:52 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 1888 posts since 13 Aug, 2011 from Berlin
The demo is dongle free.pdxindy wrote:I haven't tried Synthix because it is dongled,
Yes, MiniMoogs are like guitars. Pick up one Strat and compare it to another one. Both are unmistakably Strats but different.pdxindy wrote:The thing I learned from the gearslutz discussion about Diva is there is variation from Minimoog to Minimoog. Urs modeled a specific Minimoog and so there are characteristics in Diva from that specific one and someone might have their own Minimoog and say that Diva does not get the sound exactly the same as theirs.
All MiniMoogs I played myself sounded unmistakingly like Minis. Same for all Minis I saw other people play or the ones that I heard on certain recordings.
And the opposite happened with that Synthex emu. It simply didn't give me that WOW factor the Synthex I played and the other ones I heard people play. The real one is a monster while what I heard from the emu is rather tame.
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Okay, some elaboration: it isn't even the benchmark the majority of the time.dsynth27 wrote:If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?ok - "why is it the benchmark the majority of the time?"... not to mention the original question is Diva vs. Real Analog. I like how you elaboratehakey wrote:It isn't.
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
I use One Ping Only as my benchmark of superior sound quality.dsynth27 wrote: ok - "why is it the benchmark the majority of the time?"... not to mention the original question is Diva vs. Real Analog.
We can clearly hear.
It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that pinggggggggggggggggg!
-
- KVRAF
- 16977 posts since 23 Jun, 2010 from north of London ON
I think it 'becomes' a benchmark when someone wants to compare the sound of a VA with the analogue synth. There can be some hint of nostalgia for the real analogue synth compared to what is perceived as an authentic VA-or not. Just depends.dsynth27 wrote:ok - "why is it the benchmark the majority of the time?"... not to mention the original question is Diva vs. Real Analog. I like how you elaboratehakey wrote:It isn't.dsynth27 wrote:My question is can Diva be praised without having to compare it to hardware in order to validate the great sound it has? I think it sounds terrific but the need to compare it to hardware.... Cool
If hardware does not sound better why is it always the benchmark that we use to measure software synths?
I'm more eclectic in that it matters not whether it comes out of my Minimoog or a VA of it...they are sounds that I can mange using onboard..or-off board effects....
Barry
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing
