You'll never recreate the smell of my Opus 3 with software.jupiter8 wrote:There's Phat,warmth and heat shimmer.What else is there ? 3 variables,should be doable.Nokenoku wrote:Wrong.randyandyvandaman wrote:You cannot recreate real voltage topologies ( vco,vcf, vco.)digitally .There are way too variables
Diva Vs. Real Analog
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37261 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
ScentScapethecontrolcentre wrote:You'll never recreate the smell of my Opus 3 with software.
Ohhh, not so fast there skippy. I can't wait for the "doesn't smell analog" discussions. Also, do odors alias? I know some that cause blurry vision.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- u-he
- 30180 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- KVRist
- 181 posts since 26 May, 2005 from Lost Angeles
I miss my Opus 3. Actually got a bell sound out of it!thecontrolcentre wrote:You'll never recreate the smell of my Opus 3 with software.jupiter8 wrote:There's Phat,warmth and heat shimmer.What else is there ? 3 variables,should be doable.Nokenoku wrote:Wrong.randyandyvandaman wrote:You cannot recreate real voltage topologies ( vco,vcf, vco.)digitally .There are way too variables
- KVRist
- 443 posts since 12 Feb, 2004
After using DIVA for a short spell I became more and more convinced that you were involved in Faustian bargaining and have done the deal of all deals.Urs wrote:Thank you! We've almost recouped the investment (phewww)chacka wrote:Urs wrote:(And even if she wasn't that gamer changer we believe her to be, she's the most successful product we've ever launched - thousands of users ten days after release can't be such a bad sign)![]()
![]()
Cool man! You guy(s) deserve the success.
D(emonically) I(nvoked) V(oltage) A(nalogue)
Tell the truth Urs....there is this guy called "Old Nick" that you still have a reckoning with?
Rev 666?
01001001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100000 01100011 01100001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 00100010 01000100 01100001 01101001 01110011 01111001 00101110 00100010
- KVRAF
- 3594 posts since 8 Dec, 2008 from Global Cowboy
randyandyvandaman wrote:I think you are all sucking one another's dick.
Talk about stroking the devs ego.
Why do we have to have ten threads from the one developer alll the time.
Ban me then f**k you counts.
Cheers
You need to change your diet and take a walk in the sunshine Senor...
Also - do some reading,dig a little deeper and get happy....
Then everything you touch may have a little more radiance to it....
I'm not hearing the joy bells right now
- KVRAF
- 3594 posts since 8 Dec, 2008 from Global Cowboy
I think that he's just having problems with his mini knobchacka wrote:What happened? Did the cutoff knob of your Mini broke off?randyandyvandaman wrote:I think you are all sucking one another's dick.
Talk about stroking the devs ego.
Why do we have to have ten threads from the one developer alll the time.
Ban me then f**k you counts.
Cheers
He needs to get out more...His vocabulary is a little limited...
- KVRAF
- 18351 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Well, people will start making parts if there is a demand and maybe Korg with it's Monotrons will help generate a new market.goldenanalog wrote:two steps forward, 1 step back...
There will always be a market for analog (I was an audio guy before I was a organ/synth guy)...
DSI: Slightly insider info is that they're not seeing the numbers; and Tempest took more then they were planning on.
Here's a term that I've become familiar with:
'Parts Sourcing'...
I personally would love to see analog proliferate, but cost (including cost of ownership) plus several other factors will continue to drive the market (and innovation) in the other direction.
I really really hope that I'm wrong, my friends.
As for Tempest, they shot themselves in the foot on that one and it's nobody's fault but their own and has nothing to do with the analog nature if it's audio engine (which is hybrid anyway).
First of all, they've yet to put any good audio examples on the site for it. Why? So far I've only heard one single good audio demo from a user. Everything else sounded... well not even as good as software and that good demo came out after some volume bug got correct so I suspect something else was going on with the gain structure that was causing less than stellar audio.
Second, speaking of bugs, they released what was clearly a pre-beta unit and even that was late. How you could release a drum machine in 2011 that didn't sync or respond to MIDI is beyond my powers of comprehension. I got scared away when they missed their first ship date and cancelled my preorder.
Anyway, I don't think the analog nature of Tempest is what gave it troubles, it was the software aspects of it. Maybe trying to do too much? Be all things to all people? Not sure but for my money I think I'm going to go for the Vermona DRM1 Mk3 (which sounds fantastic to me) and use Maschine as it's sequencer/digital sound source and still come out cheaper than the cost of the Tempest.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRAF
- 1758 posts since 11 Nov, 2009 from Northern CA
True of DIVA at the moment but not true in general. To the degree that a synth implementer can introduce multi-threading into the processing, multiple cores can indeed make a consequential improvement in how much sound can be delievered by a single instance, be it more consecutive notes sounding or higher levels of rendering quality.pdxindy wrote:perhaps, but at the moment, more cores does not help run a single instance of a soft synth...
Urs has stated on the u-he forum that his initial attempts at getting multi-threading into DIVA didn't meet with much success. Don't assume that some inspired breakthrough won't happen for a future release of DIVA, however.
- KVRAF
- 26931 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
dmbaer wrote:
Urs has stated on the u-he forum that his initial attempts at getting multi-threading into DIVA didn't meet with much success. Don't assume that some inspired breakthrough won't happen for a future release of DIVA, however.
I'm not assuming that... but more cores do not help with an instance right now, which is what I said and what is available...
