"Multiple audio events per clip" could have been great, but it doesn't look like based on the screenshot on the website it's going to be real polyphonic containers of audio clips, just that you can put the clips side-by-side and move them together. So, nothing new and exciting in that...
Bitwig (!/?)
-
- KVRian
- 1270 posts since 9 Sep, 2005 from Oulu, Finland
It's still vaporware as long as there's nothing to run and try outside their company.
But I suppose at this point it does look like they have something going on for real. The price point is going to be interesting. If it's more than 200 euros, it'd better be damn versatile and good to be anything I'd ever consider.
"Multiple audio events per clip" could have been great, but it doesn't look like based on the screenshot on the website it's going to be real polyphonic containers of audio clips, just that you can put the clips side-by-side and move them together. So, nothing new and exciting in that...
"Multiple audio events per clip" could have been great, but it doesn't look like based on the screenshot on the website it's going to be real polyphonic containers of audio clips, just that you can put the clips side-by-side and move them together. So, nothing new and exciting in that...
-
- KVRAF
- 1599 posts since 19 Aug, 2009
Seems great, really great just need:
1) Automap and launchpad suport
2) user friendly copy protection system
3) Good factory content and plugs (reason 6 level)*
4) USER FRIENDLY PRICE
Great too see Linux too !!!!!!!!!!
This make me remember the cubase to S1 diferences
*Edit, seems to have some good stuff in there.
1) Automap and launchpad suport
2) user friendly copy protection system
3) Good factory content and plugs (reason 6 level)*
4) USER FRIENDLY PRICE
Great too see Linux too !!!!!!!!!!
This make me remember the cubase to S1 diferences
*Edit, seems to have some good stuff in there.
Last edited by pc999 on Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
First reaction is that the plagiarism here is shocking.
However, this could be a great product in its own right. Let's wait and see.
Also, surely Live 9 will be announced at NAMM or at least this quarter...?
THEN... we can compare and contrast them more fully.
However, this could be a great product in its own right. Let's wait and see.
Also, surely Live 9 will be announced at NAMM or at least this quarter...?
THEN... we can compare and contrast them more fully.
-
- KVRist
- 210 posts since 1 Mar, 2010 from nope
funny shit. I signed up for their news letter when the site went up so I hope the beta is first come first serve.grymmjack wrote:hrm. it looks like ableton live got raped by flstudio and rainbows.
This is looking right up my alley and after version 1 looks like when stuff gets really good with the modular system.
Looks like those boys have been hard at work cleaning up the code they wrote over at ableton, and threw in a few new tricks that we've all wanted.
no purchase until everything goes to usb 3.0 and all hosts are 64 bit!
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12066 posts since 12 May, 2008
Some interesting things, mainy of which will almost certainly be in Live 9, like clip automation recording. The idea of generic tracks is cool, bouncing in place and having midi or audio in the same track. Looks like it also has a max for live type environment built-in (after v1).
What will really be of interest to me and might allow it to eclipse Ableton for myself, would be how it handles instant mapping/automap and what it has for macros. The ableton macro system is great with instant mapping, things are so easy to control from hardware and keeps things grouped in 8's. If Bitwig did something similar but for example with more macros and included buttons, and allowed macros on a group track to be assigned to sub tracks for example, that would be something. Hopefully they put a lot of thought into this. Although from the screenshots, I don't see any kind of macro device at all.
My other question would be how it handles freeze/render of clips. If it can bounce in place and undo to midi at any time, like Studio One, I'd be sold.
What will really be of interest to me and might allow it to eclipse Ableton for myself, would be how it handles instant mapping/automap and what it has for macros. The ableton macro system is great with instant mapping, things are so easy to control from hardware and keeps things grouped in 8's. If Bitwig did something similar but for example with more macros and included buttons, and allowed macros on a group track to be assigned to sub tracks for example, that would be something. Hopefully they put a lot of thought into this. Although from the screenshots, I don't see any kind of macro device at all.
My other question would be how it handles freeze/render of clips. If it can bounce in place and undo to midi at any time, like Studio One, I'd be sold.
Last edited by Echoes in the Attic on Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 1783 posts since 11 Jun, 2005 from Phoenix, Arizona
Too funny...grymmjack wrote:hrm. it looks like ableton live got raped by flstudio and rainbows
I'm not so sure that I'd set the expectation bar too high though. Pics and YouTube vids are nice but to be fair, this is version 1.
- KVRian
- 1112 posts since 26 Jun, 2008 from Czech Republic
Well, becouse one coding guy at BitWig designed Surge, I thing the'll be not much worry about the effetc and instruments quality.
Also, CEO (and may be one other guy, didn't research it properly) are fugitives from Ableton, so if they brought patents with themselfs, Ableton could be even more dead then it was before ...
God knows if development of BitWig didnt actually couse development stop in Ableton. It kinda matches timwise...
Btw: Yeah, worried about macros too.
Also, CEO (and may be one other guy, didn't research it properly) are fugitives from Ableton, so if they brought patents with themselfs, Ableton could be even more dead then it was before ...
God knows if development of BitWig didnt actually couse development stop in Ableton. It kinda matches timwise...
Btw: Yeah, worried about macros too.
-
- KVRist
- 186 posts since 21 Apr, 2008 from Perth
Farley I wouldn't go too conspiracy crazy at the moment, I'm sure Ableton have something coming up, its not like they are the lightweights of the DAW world.
That said... I really like how this looks; I'm a big Renoise fan and this GUI looks kinda similar to me, Live never clicked with me but this just might.
That said... I really like how this looks; I'm a big Renoise fan and this GUI looks kinda similar to me, Live never clicked with me but this just might.
-
- KVRian
- 1451 posts since 1 Jun, 2008
Looks nice, but it will all come down to price and stability. I would like to see AU support.
I think the idea of having a powerful synth system integrated into the DAW is a very clever idea. Sort of taking the best parts of Reason and M4L.
I think the idea of having a powerful synth system integrated into the DAW is a very clever idea. Sort of taking the best parts of Reason and M4L.
- KVRian
- 1112 posts since 26 Jun, 2008 from Czech Republic
Anyway, they are probably considering price right now, so acording to economical rules of this planet, it we want low price, we must act, that we're not interested at all. ...so BitWhat? ...meeeh.

-
christianmusicmaker christianmusicmaker https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=12152
- KVRAF
- 1670 posts since 1 Feb, 2004 from UK
..then...Xenakios wrote:It's still vaporware as long as there's nothing to run and try outside their company.![]()
I guess this Vapourware is real VapourBut I suppose at this point it does look like they have something going on for real.
This is the biggie. I guess it will be equal to or less than Ableton Live. Could be much cheaper. I would suspect though that..The price point is going to be interesting. If it's more than 200 euros, it'd better be damn versatile and good to be anything I'd ever consider.
a. Considering how long this has been in development and how many wages need to get paid or costs covered it might not be too low a price.
b. The main target market surely is Ableton Live users (initially) so I think BW will probably price BWStudio close to Live 8's price (but not likely Suite 8's price).
Lets see.
- KVRian
- 1112 posts since 26 Jun, 2008 from Czech Republic
I hope in Live crossgrade.

-
- KVRAF
- 8519 posts since 7 Apr, 2003
I'm going to guess $500 and no segmentation of product. I'm going to guess it's all in one for that price, and that includes the modular and everything.
It will be interesting to see what happens for sure, and that UI is right up my alley as well but it's like the rest of you guys say, Live is fantastic.
The fact that it is unrivaled until BW Studio has come is another matter.
Ableton is not stupid, Max4Live is going to be tough to beat. The modular looks awesome in the screenshot, but it also most definitely won't be as capable or supported/prolific of a community as MaxMSP is.
Where Ableton could really succeed is by taking the racks concept further, much like Kontak with it's custom scripting and UI. Unfortunately though Max4Live ticks that box (but only for stuff we build in it) - for example imagine creating a Live Rack and giving it scripting/GUI, then you have a commodity market inside the product and so a dependency is built on it.
So far I've yet to see any M4L devices being sold EXCEPT for CSound which is much more robust with max objects and libraries to support it.
Interesting times indeed!
It will be interesting to see what happens for sure, and that UI is right up my alley as well but it's like the rest of you guys say, Live is fantastic.
The fact that it is unrivaled until BW Studio has come is another matter.
Ableton is not stupid, Max4Live is going to be tough to beat. The modular looks awesome in the screenshot, but it also most definitely won't be as capable or supported/prolific of a community as MaxMSP is.
Where Ableton could really succeed is by taking the racks concept further, much like Kontak with it's custom scripting and UI. Unfortunately though Max4Live ticks that box (but only for stuff we build in it) - for example imagine creating a Live Rack and giving it scripting/GUI, then you have a commodity market inside the product and so a dependency is built on it.
So far I've yet to see any M4L devices being sold EXCEPT for CSound which is much more robust with max objects and libraries to support it.
Interesting times indeed!
-
- KVRAF
- 2490 posts since 2 Jan, 2008 from denmark
it sure looks interesting,wouldnt mind beta testing 
http://soundcloud.com/subbasednb
YOUTUBE
http://www.youtube.com/user/SubbaseDnB/videos
SHOW YOUR SUPPORT BUY MY SAMPLEPACK
http://www.teamdnr.net/distorted-drums/
YOUTUBE
http://www.youtube.com/user/SubbaseDnB/videos
SHOW YOUR SUPPORT BUY MY SAMPLEPACK
http://www.teamdnr.net/distorted-drums/
-
- KVRist
- 210 posts since 1 Mar, 2010 from nope
DAmn straight. They need to do what folks did when FCP X hit the street and adobe offered crossgrades. That would be really smart.FarleyCZ wrote:I hope in Live crossgrade.![]()
Ableton is way to overpriced anyways. Instead of offering the 25% sale that last 1/3 of the year just drop the price.
no purchase until everything goes to usb 3.0 and all hosts are 64 bit!
