Bitwig (!/?)

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Locked New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Bronto Scorpio wrote:I can't even tell you how excited I am :D
I "followed" this project since Claes first mentioned it way back in the day on the Vember Audio forum (Seems to be a super nice guy by the way).
Exactly. If he wasn't involved, I'd be in "pfff, cheap copy of Live" group of people, but he is. That makes it really promissing...

If built in synth sounds as Surge, I'm not complaining at all.

Post

christianmusicmaker wrote:BW will have to work pretty hard to get over the initial zero user base size and grow it quickly. So maybe a very low initial price could be the ticket. I would say most users of DAW' (Live or otherwise) probably do not need
I dunno. It looks clever enough and unique enough to fall squarely into the "impulse buy" category for many so it will all be based on initial list pricing. Once that happens (the impulse buys) and the subsequent Internet discussions from users / buyers begin, you'll start to see some traction.

These things sell themselves really. All they mostly have to do is not suck.
BWStudio at this time but would give it a very long look and likely invest if....it was on offer for a low sub $99 introductory price. :wink:
Yeah. I imagine that the S1 Artist $20 deal probably made PreSonus a small fortune. If the Wigs do something like that at NAMM with "pre-buys" for $99 or something ... they'll make some cash and also get some strong practical exposure on release when all those people get their grubby hands on it.

Honestly... if the thing actually works as advertised, it can't fail without some serious management mis-steps. The other goofy stuff about "taking the crown" and all that is mostly irrelevant.

Slice the pie. :lol:

If I were them I'd announce the full expected list price at NAMM, sell it for 25-30% list to anyone willing - for the week of NAMM only - and also bring all of those early buyers into the beta program and give it to them right now.

They'd probably make 6 figures.
Last edited by LawrenceF on Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Post

Looks a bit like a Live clone ;) But running also native on Linux is a deal.

Seems there are some developers working for a DAW company making later their own stuff. Same with Wolfgang Kundrus and Studio One (formerly Steinberg developer).
The guys behind Bitwig are IMO also German based and formerly (or are always) Ableton developers? So it's a bit similar than with Studio One...

Anyways, only from the video and the info on the website it's a very interesting new DAW.

Post

Katzenjammer wrote:Check this picture http://bitwig.com/img/announcement_page ... evices.png
Oooh, nice. Well I guess that just leaves one small issue for me. Midi routing. I hate that Live combines the multichannel midi output of plugins into one channel. That and the inability to route midi cc data directly from one plugin to another track so it can drive parameter adjustments. To accomplish both tasks requires the IAC buss (on osx).

Post

Whats the full story behind Bitwig? Why exactly did they leave Ableton and who actually left?
Orion Platinum, Muzys 2

Post

For me, the item in those screen shots that creates the most interest is the "soon to come" modular environment thingy. If they find a way to allow the inclusion of 3rd party instruments and effects then I will have finally found a next gen succesor to Traction's racks.

Post

UncleAge wrote:For me, the item in those screen shots that creates the most interest is the "soon to come" modular environment thingy. If they find a way to allow the inclusion of 3rd party instruments and effects then I will have finally found a next gen succesor to Traction's racks.
What did Tracktions racks do?
Orion Platinum, Muzys 2

Post

LawrenceF wrote:
BWStudio at this time but would give it a very long look and likely invest if....it was on offer for a low sub $99 introductory price. :wink:
Yeah. I imagine that the S1 Artist $20 deal probably made PreSonus a small fortune. If the Wigs do something like that at NAMM with "pre-buys" for $99 or something ... they'll make some cash and also get some strong practical exposure on release when all those people get their grubby hands on it.

Honestly... if the thing actually works as advertised, it can't fail without some serious management mis-steps. The other goofy stuff about "taking the crown" and all that is mostly irrelevant.

If I were them I'd announce the full expected list price at NAMM, sell it for 25-30% list to anyone willing - for the week of NAMM only - and also bring all of those early buyers into the beta program and give it to them right now.

They'd probably make 6 figures.
Yeah some kind of intro deal would be expected. :)
Slice the pie. :lol:
:hihi:

Post

Xenakios wrote:
"Multiple audio events per clip" could have been great, but it doesn't look like based on the screenshot on the website it's going to be real polyphonic containers of audio clips, just that you can put the clips side-by-side and move them together. So, nothing new and exciting in that... :(

But even then it would be 'nothing new', since eXT had this functionality already like ten years ago. It's too bad that Jorgen completely lost the plot.

Post

v1o wrote:Whats the full story behind Bitwig? Why exactly did they leave Ableton and who actually left?
No idea, but I guess they'l tell it at some point. :D

Hmmm, I miss modulation button on reverb and more waveforms at FM synth, but other than that it looks absolutely terific...

Post

LawrenceF wrote::hihi:

Image
:)

Post

jens wrote:
Xenakios wrote:
"Multiple audio events per clip" could have been great, but it doesn't look like based on the screenshot on the website it's going to be real polyphonic containers of audio clips, just that you can put the clips side-by-side and move them together. So, nothing new and exciting in that... :(

But even then it would be 'nothing new', since eXT had this functionality already like ten years ago. It's too bad that Jorgen completely lost the plot.
Well, since only half-assed implementations (or within otherwise useless(*) applications) of this kind of a thing have existed (in Ext, Reaper and Logic, for example), I wouldn't consider those to have existed at all. BitWig could have had a great chance to nail it for their app at this stage. It's likely too difficult to add later in the application life cycle...But maybe there is some hope, who knows...

(*) IMHO and all that of course.

Post

Perfect clone of ableto Live. I don't know how will go about copyright issue.

Post

I don't need a new DAW but let's relax a little bit and remember that whatever it is, it's a 1.0 and it certainly won't be the bees knees out of the gate in every regard... so let's not criticize too much or too early.

We should collectively celebrate their achievement, whatever it is, at least until we can actually try it. This - writing a brand new DAW from scratch that may have a real place among the higher level offerings out of the gate ? (we'll see) - is no small feat.

Plenty of time to pick apart the subjective flaws later when we get a demo. :lol:

Post

christianmusicmaker wrote: BW will have to work pretty hard to get over the initial zero user base size and grow it quickly. So maybe a very low initial price could be the ticket. I would say most users of DAW's (Live or otherwise) probably do not need BWStudio at this time, but would give it a very long look and likely invest if....it was on offer for a low sub $99 introductory price. :wink:
This sums up my thought on it perfectly.

Locked

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”