Not at all!Drenholm wrote:I'm not unrealistic enough to deny the economics of developing a program such as MU.LAB, not was I in any way implying that it's something that you should apologise for, nor am I self-important to expect anyone to do anything because I ask them to! I hope it didn't actually seem as though I were any of these things.mutools wrote:Drenholm, i'm sorry that i try to survive business-wise.
Otherwise there can be no MuLab future, it's as simple as that.
Thanks + i understand.Let me be clear, since I apparently wasn't sufficiently so the last time around: I've always wished the best for your products, and MU.LAB is near the top of the list for when I have enough money to buy a sequencer/DAW. All I meant was that I can't do so at this point in time, and therefore I'll use MU.LAB 3 if I have to.
