u-he

sovietpop · Post by **sovietpop** » Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:02 pm

I've used the TEMPLATES / INIT Alpha patch like the others did.

Great setting = 7 voices for me .
At 8 voices i have audio drop out.

aMUSEd · Post by **aMUSEd** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:56 pm

Just got an email from the shop to say my Mac Mini has arrived

mcnoone · Post by **mcnoone** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:18 pm

aMUSEd wrote:Just got an email from the shop to say my Mac Mini has arrived

Hey...that's great news.
Good luck with it.
Are ya gonna get Logic Pro?

aMUSEd · Post by **aMUSEd** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:21 pm

Probably - after pay day

olikana · Post by **olikana** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:48 pm

AMD Phenom II X4 Quad 955 BE @ 3.7GHZ
i'm running a track with 12 instances in divine mode as we speak (3 poly sounds + 9 mono sounds)
can't complain

musikmachine · Post by **musikmachine** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:57 pm

I'm using an AMD 560 be, i'm seeing how much i can overclock it to see if i need to upgrade right now.

12 instances on an amd quad core?

Ch00rD · Post by **Ch00rD** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:02 pm

fmr wrote:To make direct had to head comparisons, one should agree in a common base of patches (one with short decay/release, one with long decay/release, and one with maybe two filter units (salem HP plus ladder, for example).
After estabilishing this base, all could test their machines, and post the results. Just a suggestion.

Yeah, definitely something common. Imho we should aim for ONE completely uniform patch that uses the maximum amount of CPU per voice (set to 16 voices, voice stack = 1, poly, last note priority). The downside will be that we will have a bulky 'resolution' of performance scores, but the (imho more important) upside is that the numbers will be most reliable for practical use. Otherwise I'm afraid that we'll have a lot of "I get 3 voices... but when I turn the resonance a bit higher, I have only 2 left..." It may be just me, but I really don't care how many voices of a 'lighter' patch I can play, if that number is not reliable when tweaking the patch a bit (quite possible making it heavier on the CPU).

Perhaps make it a little contest, who can create the patch that eats the most CPU cycles per voice?

Btw, play some nice big chords on the patch "SG Broken Machines"... and then guess why I gave it that name. If you have no clue at all, please post your hardware specs here.

Also, has anyone tried (to install) Diva on a Receptor yet? I can see people wanting to have her racked and tied up with MIDI / audio cables.

SJ_Digriz · Post by **SJ_Digriz** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:08 pm

When I'm running low on power I just slap on one of these

Fritze · Post by **Fritze** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:03 pm

SJ_Digriz wrote:When I'm running low on power I just slap on one of these

Cool! Do they overclock well?

GruvSyco · Post by **GruvSyco** » Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:21 am

Devine: 5
Great: 6
Fat: 10
Draft: 16

2011 Macbook Pro base 13" (i5) internal audio. Will hook up my interface this weekend.

mleghorn · Post by **mleghorn** » Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:00 am

Diva runs great on my new laptop, which is the Asus G74SX-RH71. It has the Intel i7-2670QM, and 12 GB RAM. I can run 30+ instances of Diva with no problem -- and no freezing.

standalone · Post by **standalone** » Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:04 pm

Roland is going to release the perfect controller for Diva.

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:44 pm

[DELETED]

whet · Post by **whet** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:43 pm

Can run 9-10 voices of INIT APLHA in great mode. Tested in Flstudio on a 2500k@4ghz.

phazedown · Post by **phazedown** » Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:05 pm

delete-me

u-he

KVR Audio

Hardware required for Diva, what are you using?