Thank you. I'm closer to making it happen than before.I'm still waiting for a bank from you.
Strings synthesizer
-
- KVRAF
- 5666 posts since 23 Mar, 2006 from pendeLondonmonium
I do indeed (and Diva too)
just never had the time to get stuck in...

- KVRAF
- 26956 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
cool! look forward to hearing what you come up with!himalaya wrote:I do indeed (and Diva too)just never had the time to get stuck in...
Thank you. I'm closer to making it happen than before.I'm still waiting for a bank from you.
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170
- KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
It's about timehimalaya wrote:Thank you. I'm closer to making it happen than before.
Looking forward to it
Cheers
Dennis
-
- KVRAF
- 1888 posts since 13 Aug, 2011 from Berlin
himalaya wrote:I do indeed (and Diva too)just never had the time to get stuck in...
Thank you. I'm closer to making it happen than before.I'm still waiting for a bank from you.
-
- KVRian
- 527 posts since 12 Dec, 2007 from Belgium
I think divide-down osc is possible in Zebra though. You have 16 wavetables per osc correct? I made 2 patches in my latest soundbank, where i morphed 2 oscillators shapes across a wavetable, and assigned keyboard scale to the wavetable. Meaning that for each different key pressed along the range, you get a slightly different wave. So the lowest key is osc1, and the highest key across the range is osc2, and everything in between is a morphed version of the 2 osc's. I gave up in the end because I couldn't find enough information about this divide-down osc feature though.
Anyone care to elaborate on the possibility of this?
Anyone care to elaborate on the possibility of this?
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
The thing about divide down architecture is that all voices are derived from a single continuously running master oscillator. This means that all voices share a common phase relationship (some intervals will be perfect, some will cycle over longer periods). I'm fairly certain this can't be replicated or faked in Zebra.Polybius wrote:I think divide-down osc is possible in Zebra though.
Edit: we had a bit of a discussion about it here.
- KVRAF
- 2083 posts since 28 Feb, 2011
Do any of you geniuses know whether this was the tech used in the Stringman and/or the Arp String Ensemble? 
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Pretty much all string synths used divide down oscillators.Gonga wrote:Do any of you geniuses know whether this was the tech used in the Stringman and/or the Arp String Ensemble?
That's what the string synth sound is: DDO + rich chorus.
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Here's an interesting read.
- KVRAF
- 2083 posts since 28 Feb, 2011
Thanks, I truly appreciate it! Someone just was asking me a couple days ago and I wasn't sure.
- KVRAF
- 26956 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
They had to... too expensive otherwise.hakey wrote:Pretty much all string synths used divide down oscillators.Gonga wrote:Do any of you geniuses know whether this was the tech used in the Stringman and/or the Arp String Ensemble?
That's what the string synth sound is: DDO + rich chorus.
-
- KVRAF
- 5666 posts since 23 Mar, 2006 from pendeLondonmonium
I think there's too much stress put on the actual divide-down bits and bobs. What helps to get 'that' sound is highly controllable EQ or a formant filter bank with a suitable chorus. If these can be designed to a high standard then I doubt that anybody will miss the specific key response, and phase relationships offered by divide-down technology in the mix, at least I wouldn't think so. This is even more clear once reverb, delay and phasing is applied to these string sounds (which it usually is).hakey wrote: The thing about divide down architecture is that all voices are derived from a single continuously running master oscillator. This means that all voices share a common phase relationship (some intervals will be perfect, some will cycle over longer periods). I'm fairly certain this can't be replicated or faked in Zebra.
Mind you, the 'naked' string sound is so gorgeous, as everyone knows. I no longer have much space for all my gear, but when i did I used to play my Solina and RS-202 side by side with no external effects. Such a lush (Solina) and raw (RS202) sound. Beautiful.
I have been trying to emulate my RS202 in Zebra today and so far have found that the EQ needs to offer a fuller spec, or a more complex formant filter bank in one module (see Amber). But since I'm still a total Zebra virgin I shouldn't voice what is missing as it may actually be there, perhaps available via several modules.
-
- KVRAF
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
Several Osc modules did the trick for me 
with phase reset on and precise phase offsets + volume blends.
Also modeled the waveform.
with phase reset on and precise phase offsets + volume blends.
Also modeled the waveform.
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170
- KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
The next version of Zebra will have a fully featured resonator module based on the polymoog resonator iirchimalaya wrote:I have been trying to emulate my RS202 in Zebra today and so far have found that the EQ needs to offer a fuller spec, or a more complex formant filter bank in one module (see Amber).
That's no excuse for you to wait for the next version for your bank though
Cheers
Dennis
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Yep, you can make a patch that's close (I've heard Synth1 do a passable Solina sound).himalaya wrote:I think there's too much stress put on the actual divide-down bits and bobs. What helps to get 'that' sound is highly controllable EQ or a formant filter bank with a suitable chorus.
But the DDO effect is definitely audible, and so replicating it is as important for an authentic string machine sound as, say, modelling various nonlinearities is in Diva.
