what are the differences in the wavetables in massive and the wavetable capabilities in zebra?
- KVRAF
- 24447 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
In Massive you cannot create your own wavetables. Case closed. 
- KVRAF
- 24447 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
I presume you could approximate them.
IIRC somebody made a Massive wavetable extraction Python script, so you could use that to get the WAVs of wavetables, then use wav2zebra to convert.
IIRC somebody made a Massive wavetable extraction Python script, so you could use that to get the WAVs of wavetables, then use wav2zebra to convert.
-
- KVRist
- 54 posts since 14 Feb, 2011
hi,EvilDragon wrote:I presume you could approximate them.
IIRC somebody made a Massive wavetable extraction Python script, so you could use that to get the WAVs of wavetables, then use wav2zebra to convert.
thank you for your post, that sounds promising
I googled for it and found this site:
http://sites.google.com/site/wav2zebra2/
is this the most recent version?
- KVRAF
- 24447 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
I guess? I dunno, never used it, just read about it.
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
I think so. You want the Java version as it has more features than the other. Unless you're dead set against installing Java i much recommend it over the other version.tectonica wrote:hi,EvilDragon wrote:I presume you could approximate them.
IIRC somebody made a Massive wavetable extraction Python script, so you could use that to get the WAVs of wavetables, then use wav2zebra to convert.
thank you for your post, that sounds promising! I never heard about the wav2zebra so far.
I googled for it and found this site:
http://sites.google.com/site/wav2zebra2/
is this the most recent version?
Now i kinda regret i did the program as it takes away the instant feedback you get from editing the sound directly in Zebra2. And it encourages laziness over experimenting and learning. But at the time i wrote i only saw it as a solution to a problem.
-
- KVRist
- 54 posts since 14 Feb, 2011
hi Jupiter8!
Thank you for your program and your help, I will try it this evening.
Did you try to contact Urs on implementing it directly into Zebra?
Thank you again!
best regards
Thank you for your program and your help, I will try it this evening.
Did you try to contact Urs on implementing it directly into Zebra?
Thank you again!
best regards
- u-he
- 30222 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Next non-maintenance update of Zebra will have wav import, I'm pretty sure!tectonica wrote:hi Jupiter8!
Thank you for your program and your help, I will try it this evening.
Did you try to contact Urs on implementing it directly into Zebra?
Thank you again!
best regards
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
I was in contact with him during the development of the program but we never discussed that. I felt it was a bit above my level at the time and i personally thought it was better to have an external program (it was mainly a quick hack) for U-He's sake. He opened the door for wav import but if something didn't work as expected i would get the blame instead of him.tectonica wrote:Did you try to contact Urs on implementing it directly into Zebra?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability
It is easy to get caught up in feature creep once you allow for wav import. I've seen requests of Kontakt library import which IMO is totally out of the scope for Zebra.
If you go there,be prepared to go all the way. Zebra isn't a sampler and shouldn't be so in my opinion. Let it just be the worlds best synth,be content with that,that's not too bad. But it is fun!
And now it's coming officially anyways so it's all for the best.
-
- KVRist
- 431 posts since 27 Sep, 2005
I believe that Massive has higher resolution wavetables (samples per wavetable). But AFAIR Urs said that there will be higher resolution wavetables in one of the future Zebra updates.
Also using *morph modes gives you high resolution wavetables and true morphing capabilities, unlike most wavetable synthesizers including Massive.
Also using *morph modes gives you high resolution wavetables and true morphing capabilities, unlike most wavetable synthesizers including Massive.
- KVRAF
- 4141 posts since 11 Aug, 2006 from Texas
I've found the converted Zebra wavetable sounds appreciably different than the original .wav. That's not necessarily a bad thing but might be if the user expects this. I recommend downloading some of the demo waveforms from http://www.galbanum.com/products/archit ... forms2010/ and then converting with Wav2Zebra and seeing if you like the result.PietW. wrote:The Waves in Massive are from Galbanum. You can buy the Waves and with Wave2Zebra you can create your own Wavetables.
The best bet IMO is to wait for Urs to do it right in Zebra next.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 737 posts since 20 Sep, 2006
Urs what's the timeline on this? That would probably push me to buy zebraUrs wrote:Next non-maintenance update of Zebra will have wav import, I'm pretty sure!tectonica wrote:hi Jupiter8!
Thank you for your program and your help, I will try it this evening.
Did you try to contact Urs on implementing it directly into Zebra?
Thank you again!
best regards
-
- KVRist
- 431 posts since 27 Sep, 2005
I think that is because Zebra has relatively low resolution wavetables (128 samples per waveform).bmrzycki wrote:I've found the converted Zebra wavetable sounds appreciably different than the original .wav
