TB ReelBus - thoughts?
-
- KVRian
- 676 posts since 24 May, 2011 from los angeles
also when I load up like my EAreckon channel strip vs all the plugins one by one. Even though it uses like no cpu for me to use all the plugins its a smaller load. So I would think simpler helps a little.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Yeah, if you've seen it affect your CPU, then fair enough. I think the UAD ones have options to disable animations; can't remember if the Waves one does...jam92189 wrote:not a lot but it does when you have like a big fancy gui with 3d looking everything and a big ass turning tape wheel and you go into something like reaper and turn on and off the gui you see a cpu load drop without. its like how watching HD movies takes a faster computer to do it really well than a old slow one that can just watch normal youtube stuffbduffy wrote:I'm not sure if "pretty" GUIs really affect the CPU that much. I think it's the oversampling and complex code that does it, IMHO.
-
- KVRian
- 676 posts since 24 May, 2011 from los angeles
its really not much of a hit to be noticeable unless its like a 50 tracks and up project. one thing i gotta say though is i love how stable these plugins are. never had a crash with them. when i demoes waves mpx and a few somtimes I would get a crash out of nowhere as soon as I deleted them stable right a way
- KVRAF
- 2138 posts since 8 Feb, 2007
Paradoxically, this plug should be called : UnReel
Cheers !
Cheers !
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Waves MPX was super-stable for me, but I'm not Reaper. Or is that what you're saying? Hard to tell.jam92189 wrote:its really not much of a hit to be noticeable unless its like a 50 tracks and up project. one thing i gotta say though is i love how stable these plugins are. never had a crash with them. when i demoes waves mpx and a few somtimes I would get a crash out of nowhere as soon as I deleted them stable right a way
-
- KVRian
- 676 posts since 24 May, 2011 from los angeles
its a reaper thing I think and I'm to lazy to find my old pro tools disk. I did like the UAD one but I don't use my UAD solo anymore. I would say they are all great plugins but this little guy and roundtone are my go to plugins for tape emulations 
-
- KVRAF
- 5200 posts since 17 Aug, 2004
Sound and sound shaping options. They are vastly different. And reelbus is kinda must have plugin for anyone looking for serious tape sim..Zaman wrote:So what is the difference between Ferox and Reelbus?
- KVRian
- 1369 posts since 29 Apr, 2012 from Paris
Ferox was the pre-version of Reelbus, released as a freeware. Then Toneboosters was created by Jeroen Breebaart and he released the Reelbus, which is a kind of definitive version of Ferox but payware. The ferox offers some functions which disappear with the release of Reelbus. Reelbus is a really amazing plug, very cheap but with a lot of character and potential. In that kind of cheap tape emu you can have the "Roundtone" from Sknote or the "Ferricks" from Variety of Sound.Zaman wrote:So what is the difference between Ferox and Reelbus? Also anyone know of a similar inexpensive but great tube/ valve saturator plugin?
Also check the D16's Redoptor which is a tube saturation emu, no necessarily realistic but full of color and possibilities.
-
- KVRAF
- 1863 posts since 18 Feb, 2012
I bought Reelbus months ago cause it was so cheap and because of the all hype I was reading on the forums. So far, I only used it on 1 mix to be honest. I don't find it that good, don't know, sounds like a heavy eq to me, not tape. I find Kramer Master Tape much better for that purpose, tape simulation.
- KVRAF
- 2258 posts since 25 Jun, 2008 from Montreal, Canada
Those spectral (EQ) changes are explained here: http://www.toneboosters.com/reelproject2/HcDoom wrote:I don't find it that good, don't know, sounds like a heavy eq to me, not tape.
You can adjust this behavior with the "Spectrum" knob, set it to 0 for no spectral changes.
-
- KVRAF
- 2263 posts since 6 Aug, 2007
Personally, in an A/B test between ReelBus and KMT, ReelBus sounded much more pleasant to my ears. Different strokes for different folks, I suppose, but I slap ReelBus on the master channel of pretty much every mix I do--even just rough daily bounces of WIP songs. I have yet to hear to a single mix it didn't instantly improve, but again, that's just my taste, so YMMV obviously.HcDoom wrote:I bought Reelbus months ago cause it was so cheap and because of the all hype I was reading on the forums. So far, I only used it on 1 mix to be honest. I don't find it that good, don't know, sounds like a heavy eq to me, not tape. I find Kramer Master Tape much better for that purpose, tape simulation.
- KVRist
- 234 posts since 24 Apr, 2004 from Patagonia
I've been using reelbus in every project from day one. sometimes in the 2-buss, but lot of use in tracks also, both acustic and electronic. A real gem IMHO
-
- KVRAF
- 2306 posts since 27 Jan, 2011
I've even started using Reelbus on white noise tests.... it's that good
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDj_Van ... uNbgY-4qFK
Circumcision's just another way of saying 'bye to the 'hood
Circumcision's just another way of saying 'bye to the 'hood
