Roadmap for end of 2012

Official support for: u-he.com
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Phase47 wrote:
Urs wrote:
Luftrum wrote:
Urs wrote:One more Diva update with one or two new features
Will one of the new features be an arpeggiator?
Very likely ;)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(another scenario is that we push out a quick bugfix update soon, and another update with extra features later)

Post

Urs wrote:One more Diva update with one or two new features (but no new models just yet), possibly VST3, AAX support

One ACE update with multicore support and new MIDI stuff, possibly VST3, AAX support

One Uhbik update with bugfixes, and RE support, possibly VST3, AAX support, possibly a compressor

One update for Zebra2 with bugfixes, possibly VST3, AAX support

Possibly an upgrade to Zebra3 if all goes well (it'll be cheaper to buy Zebra2 and upgrade than wait for Zebra3)

Possibly a strictly digital synth

Possibly a Diva spin off

Possibly Bazille 1.0

out of all those "Possiblies" we expect two or three to happen, depending on wherever Murphys law throws an obstacle our way

#---

Next year we'll have more Uhbiks, some more Possiblies, Berlin Modular and what not on our plates, but nothing is set in stone.

;) Urs
All this for "only" end of 2012? :shock: :D

Post

Urs wrote:One Uhbik update with ... possibly a compressor
I'd love that!! :love:

Post

Karten wrote:
Urs wrote:One Uhbik update with ... possibly a compressor
I'd love that!! :love:
Let's put it that way: Sascha finished his vanilla compressor playground today. We're up and running for dynamics design.

Post

Urs wrote:
Karten wrote:
Urs wrote:One Uhbik update with ... possibly a compressor
I'd love that!! :love:
Let's put it that way: Sascha finished his vanilla compressor playground today. We're up and running for dynamics design.
This put a smile on my face. Go Sascha! :tu: :wheee:

Post

Urs wrote:Possibly a strictly digital synth
Yes please!!! :) Sometimes it takes a while to force Zebra act more digital. I know, analog is better, agreed, but here, in Czech Republic, while back during communism, movie soundtracks were done exclusively on old analog synths. Becouse majority of those movies were crap includig those soundtracks, sounding like it is considered as not cool at all. So I'm big fan of "digital synth made by Urs" idea! :)

Post

bmrzycki wrote:
Urs wrote:
Karten wrote:
Urs wrote:One Uhbik update with ... possibly a compressor
I'd love that!! :love:
Let's put it that way: Sascha finished his vanilla compressor playground today. We're up and running for dynamics design.
This put a smile on my face. Go Sascha! :tu: :wheee:
That's indeed awesome :)

I really love the idea of a digital synth too! Time to stop the analog emulation mania! Let's start the digital emulation mania :lol:

Urs mentioned in another thread (or was it this one?) that Zebra may get very basic sample support. I'm still no fan of that idea. Sample support is like turning off friendly fire in video games....no matter how good you are you WILL start to play sloppy. Sample support often turns even the most amazing sound designers into "let's import this and that sample and call it a preset" guys.

We have some of the most amazing sound designers/synth nerds in the U-He community, it's one of the things I like the most about U-He products.
In other company forums the discussions barely go beyond "How to make superwobblesawpluck? I heard *insert random famous artist of the week here" uses synth XY for it.".

However, I think the support for basic transient samples would be a really nice feature for the digital synth instead (D-50-ish)! :)

Another thing: Please don't start to slam the latest filters into everything. FilterscapeVA sounds awesome exactly as it is now. Does it really need new filters? I know it's probably a good idea from a marketing point of view but I never had the feeling that that kind of thing influences U-He products much.
Imo the Diva filters sound great but not "better" than the Filterscape filters for example, just different. They sound analog! But is analog always the best thing? It's a perfect thing for Diva but I don't think every synth needs to sound analog. Loads of cool sounds were done on digital synths....these don't suddenly become bad because we now have the possibility to emulate analog filters rather accurately.

Sorry for the small rant :oops:
Wanted to say that for quite some time now.

But I'll simply trust the U-He team :)
I didn't like the idea of an accurate analog emulation either but Diva is just beyond amazing and I'm sure all your upcomming products will be amazing too :)
I'm just tired of all the analog is good, digital is bad, everything which doesn't have the latest tech sounds bad now, everything was better 30 years ago, blah blah blah stuff on teh intertubes.

Cheers
Dennis

Post

Bronto Scorpio wrote: Urs mentioned in another thread (or was it this one?) that Zebra may get very basic sample support. I'm still no fan of that idea.
If I understood correctly, Zebra won't get sample playback but only sample import to use samples as waveforms. And this is really good idea (especially if resolution will be higher than 128 samples per waveform) - no more wav2zebra and other blueberry things.

Post

trance_lucent wrote:
Bronto Scorpio wrote: Urs mentioned in another thread (or was it this one?) that Zebra may get very basic sample support. I'm still no fan of that idea.
If I understood correctly, Zebra won't get sample playback but only sample import to use samples as waveforms. And this is really good idea (especially if resolution will be higher than 128 samples per waveform) - no more wav2zebra and other blueberry things.
I think Urs also mentioned something about a library of waveforms to go with it? If not, then take it as a big feature request :)

Post

Urs wrote:Sascha finished his vanilla compressor playground today. We're up and running for dynamics design.
:tu:

Post

trance_lucent wrote:
Bronto Scorpio wrote: Urs mentioned in another thread (or was it this one?) that Zebra may get very basic sample support. I'm still no fan of that idea.
If I understood correctly, Zebra won't get sample playback but only sample import to use samples as waveforms. And this is really good idea (especially if resolution will be higher than 128 samples per waveform) - no more wav2zebra and other blueberry things.
That would be really cool! It's a bit complicated at the moment. Better wave import/editing would be a very welcome feature :)
I just wouldn't really like full sample import. I really like to mangle samples but I have other tools for that (Mainly Reaktor and Absynth).
coops2 wrote:I think Urs also mentioned something about a library of waveforms to go with it? If not, then take it as a big feature request :)
Check out the patch library: http://www.u-he.com/PatchLib/zebra.html#mseg
There are many awesome OSC presets :)

Cheers
Dennis

Post

Don't worry. No sample playback per se (Since many "samplers" are mere playback devices that just dump wav files into audio tracks I now call those "dumplers")

There's a whole concept evolving around ideas of how waveform data is managed within Zebra. If all goes well we'll have plenty of methods to transform and share wave data among and between various kinds of modules. A key aspect therein is the rewrite of the editors with easier handling and more level of control.

I can't speak about any preset library just yet, simply because we haven't put much thought into that. The nature of Zebra's osillators (e.g. waveforms are stored with preset) prevents us from offering 3rd party libraries like Galbanum. We would have to have them "built-in", but then they wouldn't be editable and possibly not be suited for the normal oscillators with their OscFX.

Otoh being able to import Zebra2 waveforms might already do the trick...

Post

That sounds cool to me 8)

Cheers
Dennis

Post

Urs wrote:
Luftrum wrote:
Urs wrote:One more Diva update with one or two new features
Will one of the new features be an arpeggiator?
Very likely ;)
The only feauture I miss...

Post

und wazabout the l***x tzing ?
You can't always get what you waaaant...

Post Reply

Return to “u-he”