Rack Extensions Critique/Feedback

[eXode]

Hello Sugar Bytes,

EDIT/UPDATE

Instead of single effects. Your RE effects should have been part of one large RE device containing i.e. 2 x 4 slots, lunchbox style (similar to KONG) with every effect available to load into each slot. This RE could have been priced higher but it would have enabled users to get Turnado like results out of the box, and with a handful of Reason sound designers on board, a lot of complex Combinators could have been made to accompany this RE.

[Stocker]

i will buy the SLICE ARRANGER,
its a nice tool for kick drum work....

but,thats it...

i think sugar bytes is a so much powerfull company...
so,guys: please,Effectrix or Cyclop for RE!!!!
maybe not the UI,but the DSP please...
like rob papen do it with his predator RE!!!

you have so many great plugins that i love,put some of it into reason!!!

[eXode]

See my edited/updated original post.

[ObsoleteAcc99]

[DELETED]

[ravasb]

Will there be any bug support for the REs? I like them, but they behave very erratically. I own a lot of SB VSTs and really enjoy them, but I am feeling a little burned on the REs.

For example, very often when I bounce the tracks, the tracks with SB REs often register nothing. They also are the most likely to crash during a session.

[Sugar Bytes]

We'll continue to support and bugfix our RE's. There is currently no plan to release more RE's mainly because the RE technology is too limiting.
Most of our existing products need a complex interface which is currently impossible with RE.

[ravasb]

We'll continue to support and bugfix our RE's. There is currently no plan to release more RE's mainly because the RE technology is too limiting.
Most of our existing products need a complex interface which is currently impossible with RE.

Thank you. I am glad to hear that. I really like the two REs I have and look forward to being able to use them more consistently.