TAL-U-NO-LX. Uber accurate Juno 60 emulation.
- KVRian
- 727 posts since 30 May, 2007 from Barkhamsted, CT, USA
UPDATE:
Patrick fixed the Arp/ sustain pedal response issue I (personally had) noted earlier in the string.
SOLVED!
In the latest update (1.61)
WOOT
Patrick fixed the Arp/ sustain pedal response issue I (personally had) noted earlier in the string.
SOLVED!
In the latest update (1.61)
WOOT
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
I've noticed a bug where when you switch into fingered portamento (mode 1) nothing happens until you switch to mode 2 and then back. Anyone else verify this?
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
-
- KVRian
- 867 posts since 26 Jul, 2009
simply they are no playing back the same patch,not the same settings.akademie wrote:Wow, but this doesn't seem like accurate emulation, not only the quirks, but mainly raw waveform has totaly different tonality ... ? From these recordings the UNO comes out really very thin in contrast to real JunoRexXx wrote:Fernando's Resonance A/B Files
Juno-60 Resonance Quirkiness.wav:
https://www.box.com/s/8c37eee5a5333416456f
U-No Resonance Quirkiness.wav:
https://www.box.com/s/102399c96288b27dfde3
... and comparison audio files on TAL web sit were so close , why such difference now ? ...
akademie
there is no "raw" waveform on display .
the juno60 starts with a saw and subpulse with cut off about 60% and resonance abou 50%.
i matched the opening tone closer to that juno 60 example with the unolx in 2 seconds.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/50331508/unolx ... atched.wav
and if u fine tune it a lil more u'll most likely get it exact sounding.
i guess fernando just wanted to show that they boht have that quicky behaviour in the filter and not do and A/B match soundwise.
-
- KVRian
- 595 posts since 8 May, 2006
thanks for doing that Fernando, it shows this quirk of the J-60 resonance pretty well. it's almost more "ugly" on the real thing.
i almost wish he had left that little 'emulation' out.
either way, U-NO-LX is a great sounding synth, and a steal for the intro price of $35. it'd be nice if he did something about the cosmetic issues though.
i almost wish he had left that little 'emulation' out.
either way, U-NO-LX is a great sounding synth, and a steal for the intro price of $35. it'd be nice if he did something about the cosmetic issues though.
-
- KVRer
- 26 posts since 28 Sep, 2004
Holy sh*t, that is 1:1. That's it. Thank you for proving.olikana wrote:simply they are no playing back the same patch,not the same settings.akademie wrote:Wow, but this doesn't seem like accurate emulation, not only the quirks, but mainly raw waveform has totaly different tonality ... ? From these recordings the UNO comes out really very thin in contrast to real JunoRexXx wrote:Fernando's Resonance A/B Files
Juno-60 Resonance Quirkiness.wav:
https://www.box.com/s/8c37eee5a5333416456f
U-No Resonance Quirkiness.wav:
https://www.box.com/s/102399c96288b27dfde3
... and comparison audio files on TAL web sit were so close , why such difference now ? ...
akademie
there is no "raw" waveform on display .
the juno60 starts with a saw and subpulse with cut off about 60% and resonance abou 50%.
i matched the opening tone closer to that juno 60 example with the unolx in 2 seconds.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/50331508/unolx ... atched.wav
and if u fine tune it a lil more u'll most likely get it exact sounding.
i guess fernando just wanted to show that they boht have that quicky behaviour in the filter and not do and A/B match soundwise.
Great
akademie
- KVRian
- 696 posts since 6 Nov, 2011 from The Netherlands
You don't have to forget that no analog synthesizer is exactly the same. Especially not with synthesizers that are almost 30 years old (and not serviced every yearakademie wrote:Wow, but this doesn't seem like accurate emulation, not only the quirks, but mainly raw waveform has totaly different tonality ... ? From these recordings the UNO comes out really very thin in contrast to real JunoRexXx wrote:Fernando's Resonance A/B Files
Juno-60 Resonance Quirkiness.wav:
https://www.box.com/s/8c37eee5a5333416456f
U-No Resonance Quirkiness.wav:
https://www.box.com/s/102399c96288b27dfde3
... and comparison audio files on TAL web sit were so close , why such difference now ? ...
akademie
I am guessing that it is not moddeled after one but maybe a few juno-60's. But certainly not modelled after yours.
-
- KVRist
- 51 posts since 5 Apr, 2002 from Glasgow, Scotland
FYI for anyone using automap style MIDI control -
! The relatively simple architecture make it so easy to completely program this synth without too much paging around controller menus, it really lends itself well to that. Love it!
I only got 15 minutes this morning to test, but first impressions are it works perfectly now, in Live 8 anywayHost notifies automation parameters and preset name while changing presets. (Version 1.60).
-
- KVRist
- 365 posts since 17 Apr, 2004
Posted my review tonight: http://waveformless.blogspot.com/2012/0 ... no-lx.html
- KVRian
- 1204 posts since 14 Oct, 2002 from Germany
Ohh, the thread is veeeryy big.. Sorry, i wasn't able to come in here earlier...
Well, nice that you like TAL's new synth, i like the sound, too...!
On this way i want to say a big thanx to Patrick and to FMR for his great presets...!!
Frank
Well, nice that you like TAL's new synth, i like the sound, too...!
On this way i want to say a big thanx to Patrick and to FMR for his great presets...!!
Frank
- KVRist
- 293 posts since 3 Mar, 2011
Gotta say I love the arp on this thing - EXT16 mode is brilliant but does make me wish there were more options than just up, down etc. I know, I know, it's an emulation, it just does what it does. But if there ever is a souped up version....
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Thanks olikana. I guess I have to be more careful in the future. I was just concerned with showing the quirkiness in the resonance. Next time I do A/B examples, I'll have precisely the same patch previously on both. But now that it's established, I think we can move on appreciating the great sound U-No-LX can doolikana wrote:simply they are no playing back the same patch,not the same settings.akademie wrote:Wow, but this doesn't seem like accurate emulation, not only the quirks, but mainly raw waveform has totaly different tonality ... ? From these recordings the UNO comes out really very thin in contrast to real JunoRexXx wrote:Fernando's Resonance A/B Files
Juno-60 Resonance Quirkiness.wav:
https://www.box.com/s/8c37eee5a5333416456f
U-No Resonance Quirkiness.wav:
https://www.box.com/s/102399c96288b27dfde3
... and comparison audio files on TAL web sit were so close , why such difference now ? ...
akademie
there is no "raw" waveform on display .
the juno60 starts with a saw and subpulse with cut off about 60% and resonance abou 50%.
i matched the opening tone closer to that juno 60 example with the unolx in 2 seconds.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/50331508/unolx ... atched.wav
and if u fine tune it a lil more u'll most likely get it exact sounding.
i guess fernando just wanted to show that they boht have that quicky behaviour in the filter and not do and A/B match soundwise.
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Thanks for the compliment FrankXenox.AFL wrote:Ohh, the thread is veeeryy big.. Sorry, i wasn't able to come in here earlier...
Well, nice that you like TAL's new synth, i like the sound, too...!
On this way i want to say a big thanx to Patrick and to FMR for his great presets...!!
Frank
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRian
- 696 posts since 6 Nov, 2011 from The Netherlands
Great review!tshear23 wrote:Posted my review tonight: http://waveformless.blogspot.com/2012/0 ... no-lx.html
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
Yep, that's FR contribution right thereVelocity sensitive EXT 16 sync (Version 1.63).
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
