New DIVA components

Official support for: u-he.com
Post Reply New Topic

Which synth's components would you like to see u-he add to DIVA next?

Yamaha CS-80
124
25%
Oberheim OB-X
133
27%
Prophet 5 V2
73
15%
ARP 2500
38
8%
Synthacon Filters
4
1%
Roland TB-303 Filters
67
14%
Synthi
22
5%
Polyvoks
27
6%
 
Total votes: 488

RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

rockin1 wrote:
electro wrote:
I don't see how so many people can be asking Urs to put time into emulating things that have not only been done already by others, but done well

Oberheim OB-X (Sonic Projects OP-X)
Well is pretty subjective here. This is not a natively coded plugin. It is done with SynthEdit. It is not 64 bit and does not have a Mac version. Regardless of how good it sounds this is just not usable for many of us in its current format.
That is the main problem with the Sonic Projects. The sound is 95% close to the hardware.
olikana wrote:
electro wrote:
I don't see how so many people can be asking Urs to put time into emulating things that have not only been done already by others, but done well
who says they are done well? the marketing hype ? the kvr hype ? you ??
sorry to break your bubble of assurance but they are not.

oddity and op-xv are flawed and sound plasticky with some resonant patches.
nor they are immune from digital artefacts.
in theory even the moog thing was done well according to some////i remember the rave reviews of arturia minimoog and minimonsta etc...but they are flawaed in the same way oddity is and the ppg virtual filter is (same flawed filter approach).
and the reviews about the NI pro52? here on kvr i remember the comments..."like the real thing " right . not to mention the ms20 (which btw was a decent emulation but still not "there") or the monopoly (decent but still not there).

the only good accurate synth emulations out there -apart from the diva modules- is the Tal unolx.
whihch is done with the same approach as Diva. (0 feedback filter delay)
everything elsein the emulation world should go to the trash bin and be rewritten.

even the 303 has not yet been done right....with mid/high resonance settings none of the current emulations nail it 100% and they'll never do untill they remove filter feedaback delay from the equation.

if previous emulations were actually accurate diva would have never seen the light of day...but they were obviously not.
the filters, the way oscillators are initialized, alias free FM...it had to go and fix quite a few issues which for a decade had gone ignored .
Have to disagree with you on that PPG critique. Its one of the best synths and definately in the same category as the TAL LX. All it needs is the x64 Native port.


Oddity is a decade old and OP-X and Oddity do have some platicyness, but they still come close to their hardware in many scenarios. The Xils Synthix is another good one too. These synths may be lacking that final 5% to make them indistinguishable from hardware they emulate and it may be the zero delay filter feedback thing, but you are wrong to think they need to be redone.

Just listen to the A/B Oberheim files a few posts down, especially sitting in the mix the difference is almost nil.
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 4&start=60
Intel Core2 Quad CPU + 4 GIG RAM

Post

I voted polyvoks.

But mostly I just want an input gain on the BITE filters...

Post

I would love to have Urs go in the direction of a CS-80, as it would add a different flavor, but agree that this would maybe be more appropriate for Zebra due to the routing issues. My having access to both a ribbon controller and polyphonic AT keyboard has nothing to do with it :D :D :D

Either way, Urs has a nice habit of giving me things I need prior to my realizing that I need/want them!

Post

Fritze wrote:I voted 3 oh 3. But that's only the idea of a hint of a rumour. 8)
Hope that is a hint :)

Post

Yes, sn Oberheim SEM or an ARP would be nice.

best

Post

It's not letting me vote for some reason, even though I never voted. Maybe because I looked at the results first.

I'd choose the Prophet off that list.

It'd be nice to have a switch on the Prophet filter module to choose between SSM and CEM modes (similar to the Roland modules), though this page:

http://prophet5.org/rev1vsrev3/

...claims the differences are pretty minor.

And how about a Prophet VS oscillator module? Perhaps with selectable aliasing?

Dream synth emulation is still the Octave-Plateau Voyetra 8...

Post

The Matrix-12 would be my preferred Oberheim.

Post

electro wrote:
Have to disagree with you on that PPG critique. Its one of the best synths and definately in the same category as the TAL LX. All it needs is the x64 Native port.
I don't want to be an ass but I'll make an exception today (feeling cranky).

If you can't hear the incredibly obvious difference between the hardware and software in that very clip then I'm afraid you need a bit more practice, better monitoring or hearing implants.

That clip pretty much destroys the authenticity of the plugin as it is nowhere near the tonality of the original in that very example. It's like an obscure FM Synth poorly programmed is trying to match the PPG hardware.

.. sure, I know the wavetables are the same but come on now.. surely you can hear just how different the actual tonality of the sound is.

An extremely poor example that video.

/idiotic rant (sorry about that.. did I say I'm in a bad mood? Yes.. I am). :cry: :help:
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot

"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle

Post

To add to the actual thread:

I voted 303 because the flexibility of a good 303 filter emulation and the power of Diva seriously intrigues me. My second choice would be the nasal/thin/weird filter from the Yamaha CS-80. Or is it the oscillators of the CS-80 that are nasal/weird/thin? I've never had a chance to play a real one so I have no idea how it sounds in reality.. and I've only got brief experience with the Arturia CS-80. I did like the sound of that quite a lot but it didn't sound exactly like I know it from various records and videos (mainly Vangelis in my case).

Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot

"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle

Post

todd_r wrote:
Fritze wrote:I voted 3 oh 3. But that's only the idea of a hint of a rumour. 8)
Hope that is a hint :)
I hope to ! I was thinking about the weird and awesome stuffs that could happen by feeding a 303 filter with some MS-20 or MiniMoog oscillators, would be fantastic.

Post

The world NEEDS another 303 clone :hihi: But not without support for accent and slide ... Something that could work with the new BlueARP for instance
:hug:

Post

I don't mind if some future Diva components have already been modeled elsewhere. I'd love to have more OSCs, filters and enveloppes components in Diva to mix them all together, in the most iconoclast way. The gorgeous sound quality, intuitive workflow thanks to its limitations and the modular take are why I love Diva so much ! And of course, poly MS20 :love:

Post

I'll throw my usual'voice of insanity' into the mix (hey! Kept me working! :hihi: ):

I voted modular, but I'd much rather see Urs do something that hasn't already been done. Even though it's part of my own handle, I don't really care that much about analog synths to see them all be reborn in software.

Why? What's the reason? Is it about having a'collection' of synths that we couldn't afford/didn't have the space, etc?

Computers provide a far greater platform possibility wise then any synth in history ever could.

However: If it must be an analog synth emu: Matrix 12, but look out for Gibson...

Post

CS-80

Because then I can get rid of my Arturia V collection and only use Diva! :)

Post

What about some new envelopes? Just throwing the idea out to see what sticks ... :) And i mean that as both as envelopes from another synth and as in an extra envelope .. could be just a simple one. It would help me making kicks ;) Though the routings are a bit limited for that with for instance only one modulator for the sallen filters. Even with the "Add" i still don't get 'enough' control :P

Has anyone got any soundexamples of the cs-80? Something to show what makes it wanted or it's character. I simply don't know much of it!
:hug:

Post Reply

Return to “u-he”