Harry_HH wrote:Yes I can, and I do. As a consumer and Live end-user I have all right to give my feedback and to affect to what kind of product I get.puzzlefactory wrote:You can't blame them for that though. They occupy a niche in the market and are concentrating on developing the parts of their product that make up that unique niche. There are plenty of products that already accommodate people wishing to work in a more traditional DAW environment. Live, I feel, has always been an alternative working environment not an additional one.
Of course then it's the company which draws the conclusion and makes the decisions. What is essential, is that the end-user, e.g. musicians who is now choosing a DAW, knows what kind of product he/she is buying, what are the alternatives, and if the product suits to his/her purposes. If the Live want's to be first of all a "dj playmate" and not develope the arrange features, then it is a "dj playmate" and not a serious music producer DAW. I think the Live could be innovative tool, which integrates the sample management and traditional linear music making, but then the Ableton should put the development efforts 50-50 (or rather 20-80 to the arrange), now the ratio seems to be 95-5 for the djs'.
I know what the (present) Live is, as said, like very much many of it's feature, and liked to see it developing a much better tool for musicians and producers. H.
Live is already a serious music producer daw...