I don't know that's an equivalent. Not everyone in music should be called a maestro in the same way that not everyone who has looked at an anatomy book should be called a doctor; but perhaps everyone in music can be called a musician in the same way that anyone who has read an anatomy book can be called "studied in anatomy".SJ_Digriz wrote:everyone should be encouraged ... but participating in music doesn't make you a musician anymore than reading an anatomy and physiology book makes you a doctor
I just don't like this whole denial of musician or music to a person or person's output. It stinks of exclusivity to me. For a start, where do you draw the line? When do you become a musician? There's no mandated exam to pass to become a musician and no standard of where cacophony and melody slide suddenly become 'music'.
When I first picked up a guitar and played 2 alternating notes was I a musician? When I struggled to play Smoke on the Water very badly was I a musician? When I was first able to play barre chords was I a musician? When I could shred at speed was I a musician? Am I a musician yet? How do I tell?