This new SSL channel strip from IK Multimedia looks great
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRist
- 149 posts since 4 Oct, 2010
So I took the time to actually demo it within a project today... and my original opinion stands, don't really see what the problem is 
I can understand making the bg layer a little more photo-realistic and some slight tweaking to lower the color saturation on the knobs... but honestly, I've been using it just fine without becoming sterile, feeling like I'm in grade school, turning into a crazed maniac, etc.
I can understand making the bg layer a little more photo-realistic and some slight tweaking to lower the color saturation on the knobs... but honestly, I've been using it just fine without becoming sterile, feeling like I'm in grade school, turning into a crazed maniac, etc.
-
Brian @ IK Multimedia Brian @ IK Multimedia https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=249743
- KVRian
- 1042 posts since 6 Feb, 2011
Looks like our channel strip's GUI has been universally panned (pun intended.)
We will probably update the graphics in a future update. Truth be told, these graphics were sort of a last minute stand-in. Seems a certain company frowned upon usage of our original graphics...
We're trying to convince Peter to post the originally intended graphics on our Facebook. We'll see how that goes!
However, I will say this - the quality of this channel strip model overcomes however it may look. Sure, some may say the GUI looks like it was made with crayons by deranged cub scouts after eating the wrong mushrooms on a scout camping trip, but it certainly does not sound like it (unless of course that's the sound you're going for.) The interface quickly becomes less of the focal point and more what it should be: simply the means by which you interact with an amazing sounding processor. You end up mixing with your ears instead of your eyes.
A lot of plugins seem to be designed more with playing with a pretty interface in mind and less about how it sounds in your mix. They seem to be trying to trick your brain into thinking the plugins sound better. In the case of the British Channel, the sound quality of the plugin actually tricks your brain into thinking it looks better!
Shiny photo-realistic interfaces are great, but in the end, your listeners only hear what your plugins do, not how they look.
We will probably update the graphics in a future update. Truth be told, these graphics were sort of a last minute stand-in. Seems a certain company frowned upon usage of our original graphics...
We're trying to convince Peter to post the originally intended graphics on our Facebook. We'll see how that goes!
However, I will say this - the quality of this channel strip model overcomes however it may look. Sure, some may say the GUI looks like it was made with crayons by deranged cub scouts after eating the wrong mushrooms on a scout camping trip, but it certainly does not sound like it (unless of course that's the sound you're going for.) The interface quickly becomes less of the focal point and more what it should be: simply the means by which you interact with an amazing sounding processor. You end up mixing with your ears instead of your eyes.
A lot of plugins seem to be designed more with playing with a pretty interface in mind and less about how it sounds in your mix. They seem to be trying to trick your brain into thinking the plugins sound better. In the case of the British Channel, the sound quality of the plugin actually tricks your brain into thinking it looks better!
Shiny photo-realistic interfaces are great, but in the end, your listeners only hear what your plugins do, not how they look.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 1580 posts since 22 Apr, 2011 from The House of Zaid
they dont even hear the plugins man, your average listener can't even tell when they are hearing harmony or solo vocals.Brian @ IK Multimedia wrote:Shiny photo-realistic interfaces are great, but in the end, your listeners only hear what your plugins do, not how they look.
"how come when i sing it it doesnt sound the same?"
"because you dont have 3 backup singers, darling"
we are all WAY more hung up on sound quality than 99% of listeners... it's still the songwriting choices you make that matter the most.
Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
-
el-bo (formerly ebow) el-bo (formerly ebow) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=208007
- KVRAF
- 17981 posts since 24 May, 2009 from A galaxy, far far away
nothing to do with photorealism, nor is there a problem being colourful...the problem is lack of cohesion and total randomness that end in a combined visual messBrian @ IK Multimedia wrote: Shiny photo-realistic interfaces are great, but in the end, your listeners only hear what your plugins do, not how they look.
it needn't look like the hardware, it should just look better
and the whole 'mixing with ears not eyes' sentiment ends up just being patronising....if gui is not important then just use sliders and text...
'ugly but sounds good' seems to be the general sentiment so people are really not missing the point
-
Suspended In Dusk Suspended In Dusk https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=48642
- KVRist
- 61 posts since 20 Nov, 2004
I'm still demo'ing it - just so that I can prove that I do have some sort of control over my GAS.Brian @ IK Multimedia wrote:Looks like our channel strip's GUI has been universally panned (pun intended.)
We will probably update the graphics in a future update. Truth be told, these graphics were sort of a last minute stand-in. Seems a certain company frowned upon usage of our original graphics...
We're trying to convince Peter to post the originally intended graphics on our Facebook. We'll see how that goes!
However, I will say this - the quality of this channel strip model overcomes however it may look. Sure, some may say the GUI looks like it was made with crayons by deranged cub scouts after eating the wrong mushrooms on a scout camping trip, but it certainly does not sound like it (unless of course that's the sound you're going for.) The interface quickly becomes less of the focal point and more what it should be: simply the means by which you interact with an amazing sounding processor. You end up mixing with your ears instead of your eyes.
It does a very, very fine job sonically - I absolutely love it on drums. Once you start digging in, the GUI ceases to be a concern. In terms of functionality and layout, everything is there in its right place. The issue is purely aesthetic.
But of course, I'm a sucker for eye-candy so I'll certainly appreciate the improved GUI.
-
- KVRAF
- 1924 posts since 15 Oct, 2008 from Germany
Good to hear. TBH, there would have been a lot less commotion if you had said this from the beginning: "People, here's our channel strip. The UI isn't finished yet due to IP issues, so try to ignore the looks for now. We still thought it would be great to have you people try it sooner than later. If you have ideas and wishes for the UI, let us know!"Brian @ IK Multimedia wrote: We will probably update the graphics in a future update. Truth be told, these graphics were sort of a last minute stand-in. Seems a certain company frowned upon usage of our original graphics...
KVRians love being involved in the development process.
-
- KVRAF
- 14739 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Agreed - though I hate the fact that everything else will be handled through FaceCrook yet again. 
-
Brian @ IK Multimedia Brian @ IK Multimedia https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=249743
- KVRian
- 1042 posts since 6 Feb, 2011
Compy, we're just talking about posting a picture here. A picture of what could have been, but isn't and never will be. Facebook is the place where people post pictures of things that aren't. Like this:

But IF it happens, then I'm sure the pic would make its way to KVR.
But just like the guy with the photoshopped girlfriend, you won't actually be able to twiddle the knobs...

But IF it happens, then I'm sure the pic would make its way to KVR.
But just like the guy with the photoshopped girlfriend, you won't actually be able to twiddle the knobs...
-
el-bo (formerly ebow) el-bo (formerly ebow) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=208007
- KVRAF
- 17981 posts since 24 May, 2009 from A galaxy, far far away
Brian @ IK Multimedia wrote:
![]()
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 652 posts since 28 Dec, 2011 from Seattle,WA, USA
Yeah the more I play with it the more I like it. I was in video chat with some friends who say they actually prefer its look over the other overly serious looking SSL channel strip emulations surprisingly. They said it was a cool psychedelic look.TheoM wrote:you know i like it more and more the more i use it. Give it time folks it really grows on you.
-
Peter - IK Multimedia Peter - IK Multimedia https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=217907
- KVRAF
- 8146 posts since 20 Oct, 2009
Did someone mention my name? I was in a meeting with the British Channel GUI designer

*obvious joke, in case anybody really thinks I need to make this disclaimer or be as PC as to say I don't condone anything illegal and I was only designated driver I swear*

*obvious joke, in case anybody really thinks I need to make this disclaimer or be as PC as to say I don't condone anything illegal and I was only designated driver I swear*
-
- KVRAF
- 1580 posts since 22 Apr, 2011 from The House of Zaid
Peter - IK Multimedia wrote:Did someone mention my name? I was in a meeting with the British Channel GUI designer
*obvious joke, in case anybody really thinks I need to make this disclaimer or be as PC as to say I don't condone anything illegal and I was only designated driver I swear*
Legal in my state
neener-neener
Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
