Hi mate, I was just playinglingyai wrote:Sorry, your argument is a bit mushy, MushyMushyMushy Mushy wrote:And it's actually not true anyway.
Per capita they're rubbish.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0104-13.htm
If you a) look at more than just one year and b) count non-governmental aid, you'll see that that's not true at all.
Scroll down the page until you see the comparative graph
http://www.economist.com/node/5517605
... they are in fact far and away leading donors on this basis (per capita)
This discussion doesn't belong in this thread so I apologise to the OP