![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
WHew!
And Windows RTFM - I mean 8 - is clearly not. There have been times that some very important icons have shown up while using MS's latest OS, but I have no idea what done it; mouse fluff, buttock shift, brow sag, genital swish? Something did something and then the most important things you could possibly hope to utilize appeared briefly.aMUSEd wrote:He argued that if you need to consult a manual to perform basic operations then there is a problem with the design. Tracktion is clearly based on those principles.
That is the funniest thing I've heard all day! I'm crying over here!pough wrote:And Windows RTFM - I mean 8 - is clearly not. There have been times that some very important icons have shown up while using MS's latest OS, but I have no idea what done it; mouse fluff, buttock shift, brow sag, genital swish? Something did something and then the most important things you could possibly hope to utilize appeared briefly.
Cool stuff, let me, or one of the other mods know when you've got a release and we can add it to the useful utilities sticky.Runaway wrote:For those intrested we are currently trialing our next version of AATranslator which among other things contains the functionality to create Tracktion session files. So while we already read them soon you will be able to convert from other daws back to Tracktion (if need be).
Aiynzahev wrote:So you guys like Tracktion a lot. Care to elaborate on why?
I like Studio One 2.5 quite a lot, mainly for it's simplicity. Any comparisons that can be made?
Interesting. In S1 I'd have to say I'd bounce the delay and apply effects as "take effects" or "event effects" or whatever you want to call them, applying the effect just to the selected portion. Don't know about how I'd do it only on the right though... I'd have to split it into L & R and I'm not sure how to do that on S1 since I've never needed to, though it would be an easier way to do the HAAS effect come to think of it.AndrewSimon wrote:Aiynzahev wrote:So you guys like Tracktion a lot. Care to elaborate on why?
I like Studio One 2.5 quite a lot, mainly for it's simplicity. Any comparisons that can be made?
My standard answer:
Let's say you have a guitar track and you want to go a little crazy with it.
You want to add a Ping-Pong Delay and Reverb to it but you don't want reverb on the repeats (aka parallel setup)
Now let's say you want to add a little fuzz on the Delay but only on the repeats (not to the direct sound) and for the heck of it you want it only on the repeats that are on the left side (no fuzz on the right side repeats)
In Tracktion I can do this in seconds without thinking about it.
How long will this take in other DAWs?
By the way Studio One is my second favorite DAW
I had it marked for the day I would have to part with Tracktion... luckly
I won't have to now.
Trackion also has a little better CPU usage and I can get lower latencies then with Studio One. (or any other DAW for that mater)
I think the answer you are looking for is "Racks". It's a modular routing environment within Tracktion. You drag and drop plugins into them and can then rearrange them how you want, and connect any plugin output to any plugin input. Instances of the rack can be placed on as many tracks as you want. This is also the way Tracktion handles multi out VSTIs. Drop the synth in a rack and all the outputs show up as outputs of the rack. Each instance can have different outputs routed to the track it's on. It sounds complicated, but it's really not.Aiynzahev wrote: So how would you do it so easily in tracktion that differs from what I just said?
Yep.bk wrote:I think the answer you are looking for is "Racks". It's a modular routing environment within Tracktion. You drag and drop plugins into them and can then rearrange them how you want, and connect any plugin output to any plugin input. Instances of the rack can be placed on as many tracks as you want. This is also the way Tracktion handles multi out VSTIs. Drop the synth in a rack and all the outputs show up as outputs of the rack. Each instance can have different outputs routed to the track it's on. It sounds complicated, but it's really not.Aiynzahev wrote: So how would you do it so easily in tracktion that differs from what I just said?
They look like this:
Yes to the first question, no idea on the second.Aiynzahev wrote:Does it let you do wet/dry mix with any plug-in like Reaper?
Also wasn't S1 2.5 supposed to give us that?
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement