MuTools

dakkra · Post by **dakkra** » Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:38 pm

I think the biggest problem with that idea tough is the fact that external VST use alot more CPU power than the DAW itself. At the "Mulab 5 VST" point, we might as well just use rewire. At this point the MUX can't really get any bigger (Other than some modules). The practicality of that isn't even there. Having a DAW as a VST is overkill. I think the MUX, for the most part, is good where it is. Small things like frequency modulation, phase distortion, etc... would bring it up to speed. Other than that the MUX is as close to a DAW as it should be IMO.

sl23 · Post by **sl23** » Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:44 pm

Ok never knew that. It wasn't so much a suggestion as an enquiry anyway

pquenin · Post by **pquenin** » Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:04 pm

dakkra wrote:I think the biggest problem with that idea tough is the fact that external VST use alot more CPU power than the DAW itself. At the "Mulab 5 VST" point, we might as well just use rewire. At this point the MUX can't really get any bigger (Other than some modules). The practicality of that isn't even there. Having a DAW as a VST is overkill. I think the MUX, for the most part, is good where it is. Small things like frequency modulation, phase distortion, etc... would bring it up to speed. Other than that the MUX is as close to a DAW as it should be IMO.

I totally agree. MUX is not a DAW and must not become one.

The ability to create Muclips in the MUX make sense, but I wonder why Jo want to add compositions into the MUX, and why he thinks it's a dream ?

mfkne · Post by **mfkne** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:14 pm

What about MUX for Mac?

Mu.Lab is for Mac, too....

MuTools · Post by **MuTools** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:41 pm

There is no ETA yet.

mfkne · Post by **mfkne** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:51 pm

mutools wrote:There is no ETA yet.

What a pity...

MuTools

KVR Audio

MUX 5 Vst Test