ferez21 wrote:I was wondering about MUX lately, what do you think about it's raw sound quality and filter quality? These are the 2 most important things to me on a synth + CPU usage of course
In terms of CPU usage it equals 99% to Sylenth, even if it can be far more complex even at Oscillator level...anomandaris1 wrote:Is Mux CPU efficient?
About sound quality: What I like best with MUX, is the fact that it is really hard to make it sound bad... no matter, what I try I always come up with sounds, which I like...
Second: This example was made with MUX V1... meanwhile there is a public beta/pre release of the new version (which jumps to version number 5 to match version number of it's big brother MuLab), in which the developer further optimized the filter algorythm...
Everybody should try the demo.... this is perhaps the most underrated product of the last few years...
Another hint: I am not a very good sound designer and I am sure, that someone with more programming skills than me can match the sound of Sylenth even more...

