You cant, its locked.bmanic wrote:@Urs: Because it's a reaktor ensemble you can just open it up and take a peak at how it's done. Perhaps there is something to learn? Or not. Never know.
Cheers!
bManic
A new competitor to Uhe Diva has arived!!!
-
- Banned
- 18651 posts since 2 Oct, 2001 from England
-
- KVRian
- 530 posts since 1 May, 2011
knowledge that parts of it are locked was leaked awhile ago but now that its out hopefully someone will describe in detail whats locked and what isn'thakey wrote:Who says (apart from you)?Kriminal wrote:its locked
miedex
-
- KVRAF
- 37518 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Not completely - I can open it up and get into the structure to quite a deep level. It may be that one of two bits of the core programming are locked - not sure where to look tbh
-
- KVRAF
- 37518 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
btw Urs has nothing to worry about (as if he was), this is good for a Reaktor ens but no competition for Diva in the slightest. For example I just tried one of my filter droppers from Diva in Monark, the resonance response is nice and smooth but doesn't go all the way down like it does in Diva - it cuts out when you get to the bottom end.
However it does hopefully open up a lot of possibilities for Reaktor programming provided people can reuse the modules.
However it does hopefully open up a lot of possibilities for Reaktor programming provided people can reuse the modules.
-
- KVRAF
- 3777 posts since 8 Dec, 2008 from Global Cowboy
LOL..I read this wrong...aMUSEd wrote:btw Urs has nothing to worry about (as if he was), this is good for a Reaktor ens but no competition for Diva in the slightest. For example I just tried one of my filter droppers from Diva in Monark, the resonance response is nice and smooth but doesn't go all the way down like it does in Diva - it cuts out when you get to the bottom end.
However it does hopefully open up a lot of possibilities for Reaktor programming provided people can reuse the modules.
I read "It's nice and smooth but doesn't go all the way like Diva does"
No auto tune...
-
- KVRAF
- 37518 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Well you know what they say about Divasdigitalboytn wrote:LOL..I read this wrong...aMUSEd wrote:btw Urs has nothing to worry about (as if he was), this is good for a Reaktor ens but no competition for Diva in the slightest. For example I just tried one of my filter droppers from Diva in Monark, the resonance response is nice and smooth but doesn't go all the way down like it does in Diva - it cuts out when you get to the bottom end.
However it does hopefully open up a lot of possibilities for Reaktor programming provided people can reuse the modules.
I read "It's nice and smooth but doesn't go all the way like Diva does"
-
- KVRAF
- 11386 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Ah I didn't know Monarch is locked up.. oh well. I presume that I can still use the filter and osc blocks for my own synth designs?
Cheers!
bManic
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
-
- KVRian
- 867 posts since 26 Jul, 2009
@Urs
what about a 0df filter without non linearities, i'm really curious to hear what a synth with a sterile 0dff 24db sounds like. is it even feasable? (i heard the jx8p had an almost sterile filter- and it wasn't terrible imo)
bottomline : my dream is to have a 0dff synth on a tablet soon enough (in time for the summer). so i'm willing to compromise on some non linearities if these clog up cpu cycles considerably....but can't live without 0dff.
my favourite diva filter currently is the jupiter8 (the most versatile and wide) which i see uses a bit less cpu than the moog one...i guess because it is less saturated than the moog(less non linearities?) .
what about a 0df filter without non linearities, i'm really curious to hear what a synth with a sterile 0dff 24db sounds like. is it even feasable? (i heard the jx8p had an almost sterile filter- and it wasn't terrible imo)
bottomline : my dream is to have a 0dff synth on a tablet soon enough (in time for the summer). so i'm willing to compromise on some non linearities if these clog up cpu cycles considerably....but can't live without 0dff.
my favourite diva filter currently is the jupiter8 (the most versatile and wide) which i see uses a bit less cpu than the moog one...i guess because it is less saturated than the moog(less non linearities?) .