A new competitor to Uhe Diva has arived!!!
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
EVERY time I see this thread I read the title as "A new computer to use Diva has arrived"
I guess because I bought a new computer to run these modern powersynths I'm projecting that
I guess because I bought a new computer to run these modern powersynths I'm projecting that
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 694 posts since 8 Apr, 2012 from planet Earth
So what computer do u bought?Sendy wrote:EVERY time I see this thread I read the title as "A new computer to use Diva has arrived"![]()
I guess because I bought a new computer to run these modern powersynths I'm projecting that
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
LOOOOL!
Urs & his team are very smart!
they have modded all of the sound!
no idea how much circuit modding is done (if even any) but they did an outstanding job as has been proven on the old Diva vs analog threads
The New & Improved U-he team are making some real waves already & they have only just started!
can't wait to see what the newest member ads to the pallet!
Subz
Urs & his team are very smart!
they have modded all of the sound!
no idea how much circuit modding is done (if even any) but they did an outstanding job as has been proven on the old Diva vs analog threads
The New & Improved U-he team are making some real waves already & they have only just started!
can't wait to see what the newest member ads to the pallet!
Subz
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 694 posts since 8 Apr, 2012 from planet Earth
+1djsubject wrote:LOOOOL!
Urs & his team are very smart!
they have modded all of the sound!
no idea how much circuit modding is done (if even any) but they did an outstanding job as has been proven on the old Diva vs analog threads
The New & Improved U-he team are making some real waves already & they have only just started!
can't wait to see what the newest member ads to the pallet!
Subz
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
Satin! (hi Subzdjsubject wrote:can't wait to see what the newest member ads to the pallet
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
It's black and goes really fastchilly7 wrote:So what computer do u bought?Sendy wrote:EVERY time I see this thread I read the title as "A new computer to use Diva has arrived"![]()
I guess because I bought a new computer to run these modern powersynths I'm projecting that
Intel Core i7-2500K CPU @ 3.40GHz (it's a quad core and overclocked 4x, no idea if that's reflected in this information!). Since the multicore update Diva rarely makes a dent, unless I'm doing pads, and even then it's totally managable at something like 7% for a decent pad arrangement with 8-10 notes polyphony. It's rare I ever need to switch out of divine mode.
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
- KVRAF
- 6504 posts since 25 May, 2002 from Bobo-dioulasso\BF__Geneva/CH
Let see what will happened CPUwise with the new feature coming, though it won't necessarily be significant on that point (arpegiator, for instance...)
-
- KVRAF
- 1724 posts since 10 Feb, 2008 from Berlin, Germany
I would love to hear a direct comparison of the same filter (without any nonlinearities) one time with the usual 1 sample delay, and one time with zero delay feedback.olikana wrote:first of all the objective of 0dff is to eliminate the smearing ("plasticky coating" as referred to in other thread ) when tightly modulating cutoff with high resonance. that is what bugs me the most about old dsp filters. (obviously it never bugged u as u was always happy with softsynths...but personally it makes me cringe).
-
- KVRian
- 867 posts since 26 Jul, 2009
ok dudes i bought monark and here it goes
things i liked more in monark so far
-the feedback/load combo
combine FEEDBACK with LOAD and u get a miriade of many rich distorted tones. really nice. it's a must have feature imo. Feedback B (when the letter B is showing) in particular is very useful for straightforward distortion and less swampy than the other feedback type which btw seems more similar to the diva one.
-the noise generator (white noise almost equal,pink noise much better in monark)
i complained about divas white noise being too bright and brittle and not full bodied enough...but actually the white noise in monark has more highs than diva (maybe less britle) and doesn't even have any more body than the diva has. i would say the difference is marginal in the white noise department but still a little tiny nudge towards monark.
the pink noise.....while the diva one seems to be just white noise minus the high frequencies....the monark one brings in shit loads of bass content (that is not present in the white noise) making it massive. here the pink noise of monark is really an added weapon.
- the FM...can't get the 2 to sound identical ...diva's more flexible for sure but but . i'll pass my judgment on this till i made more tests
for now this i noticed...
things i liked more in monark so far
-the feedback/load combo
combine FEEDBACK with LOAD and u get a miriade of many rich distorted tones. really nice. it's a must have feature imo. Feedback B (when the letter B is showing) in particular is very useful for straightforward distortion and less swampy than the other feedback type which btw seems more similar to the diva one.
-the noise generator (white noise almost equal,pink noise much better in monark)
i complained about divas white noise being too bright and brittle and not full bodied enough...but actually the white noise in monark has more highs than diva (maybe less britle) and doesn't even have any more body than the diva has. i would say the difference is marginal in the white noise department but still a little tiny nudge towards monark.
the pink noise.....while the diva one seems to be just white noise minus the high frequencies....the monark one brings in shit loads of bass content (that is not present in the white noise) making it massive. here the pink noise of monark is really an added weapon.
- the FM...can't get the 2 to sound identical ...diva's more flexible for sure but but . i'll pass my judgment on this till i made more tests
for now this i noticed...
-
- KVRian
- 867 posts since 26 Jul, 2009
about the FM
in monark:
oscillator 3 set to SQUARE set to 8'octave volume 0
oscillator 1 set to SAW set to 2'octave volume 100%
set with the modulation wheel FM to full
in diva (corresponding settings):
oscillator 1 SQUARE set to 8'octave Volume 0
oscillator 2 SAW set to 2' octave volume 100%
set FM to...hm .no matter the amount it will never match and will have some sort of lower tone to it. i think maybe aliasing issue?
if someone could look into it please
btw tonight i conducted a miriad of tests ...diva and monark really sound identical for the most part (apart from the differences posted above).
one thing i noticed was the square wave slightly different but morphing diva's square to 7.10-7.15 kinda matched it
in monark:
oscillator 3 set to SQUARE set to 8'octave volume 0
oscillator 1 set to SAW set to 2'octave volume 100%
set with the modulation wheel FM to full
in diva (corresponding settings):
oscillator 1 SQUARE set to 8'octave Volume 0
oscillator 2 SAW set to 2' octave volume 100%
set FM to...hm .no matter the amount it will never match and will have some sort of lower tone to it. i think maybe aliasing issue?
if someone could look into it please
btw tonight i conducted a miriad of tests ...diva and monark really sound identical for the most part (apart from the differences posted above).
one thing i noticed was the square wave slightly different but morphing diva's square to 7.10-7.15 kinda matched it
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 694 posts since 8 Apr, 2012 from planet Earth
no worries for Mac Pro ovners...Krakatau wrote:Let see what will happened CPUwise with the new feature coming, though it won't necessarily be significant on that point (arpegiator, for instance...)
Last edited by chilly7 on Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
