newbie: is cutting amplitude in half -3 or -6dB?
-
- KVRist
- 143 posts since 29 Aug, 2011
Ultra-newbie question:
Is cutting the amplitude of a sound wave in half the equivalent half -3 or -6dB?
Is cutting the amplitude of a sound wave in half the equivalent half -3 or -6dB?
- KVRAF
- 16875 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
An answer using deductional logic:Swiss Frank wrote:Ultra-newbie question:
Is cutting the amplitude of a sound wave in half the equivalent half -3 or -6dB?
Audio on Compact Disk uses 16 bits.
Each bit doubles the amplitude.
So CDs have a dynamical range of either 3x16 = 48 or 6x16 = 96 dB.
Cassette tape has a dynamical range of 55dB at most (without Dolby)
CDs do much MUCH better than cassette tape.
So the correct answer has to be -6 or -6.0205999132796239042747778944899 dB.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
- KVRist
- 362 posts since 1 Apr, 2009 from Hannover, Germany
Please don't do this ever again, it might induce cancer.BertKoor wrote: An answer using deductional logic:
Audio on Compact Disk uses 16 bits.
Each bit doubles the amplitude.
So CDs have a dynamical range of either 3x16 = 48 or 6x16 = 96 dB.
Cassette tape has a dynamical range of 55dB at most (without Dolby)
CDs do much MUCH better than cassette tape.
So the correct answer has to be -6 or -6.0205999132796239042747778944899 dB.
-
- KVRist
- 69 posts since 27 Nov, 2012
i would say that half the signal equals -3 db as the formula is 10*log P2/P1 for powers
and the formula is 20*log V1/V2 for tensions so -6 db
careful it's logarithm in base 10 not other base...
and the formula is 20*log V1/V2 for tensions so -6 db
careful it's logarithm in base 10 not other base...
- KVRian
- 752 posts since 19 Mar, 2011
Maybe interesting ?
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-levelchange.htm
Cutting the amplitude to the half is cutting the voltage to the half what is -6.xxx db.
Am i wrong ?
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-levelchange.htm
Cutting the amplitude to the half is cutting the voltage to the half what is -6.xxx db.
Am i wrong ?
- KVRAF
- 8511 posts since 12 Feb, 2006 from Helsinki, Finland
If you're working with regular PCM signals, then half the signal is (roughly) -6dB. If you're working with squared quantities (eg power, RMS) then half is -3dB (essentially all we're doing is dividing the result by 2 to undo the exponent once in log-domain, which saves having to take a square root first). This way you get the same dB values independent of whether you squared your signal first. Since this probably refers to the problem of adjusting and/or measuring regular signals (as they are sent to an audio interface) the 20log10 or ~6dB rule is what you want.ion_one wrote:i would say that half the signal equals -3 db as the formula is 10*log P2/P1 for powers
and the formula is 20*log V1/V2 for tensions so -6 db
careful it's logarithm in base 10 not other base...
To the OP: to convert decibels into multipliers (eg to adjust volume by dB) use the formula pow(10, dbGain/20), and to convert measurement values to dB use the formula 20*log(value)/log(10). The ~6dB is a convenient approximation; it's useful when talking about things in terms of powers of two (rather than ten) but it's not exact.
-
- KVRian
- 610 posts since 6 Mar, 2005 from USA
-3dB cuts the voltage by .7071, and the power by half.
-6dB cuts the voltage by half, and the power by a quarter.
The equation is voltage in dB = 20 log10(voltage/ref voltage) or
power in dB = 10 log10(power/ref power).
-6dB cuts the voltage by half, and the power by a quarter.
The equation is voltage in dB = 20 log10(voltage/ref voltage) or
power in dB = 10 log10(power/ref power).
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 143 posts since 29 Aug, 2011
Thanks all.
I knew CDs were about -96dB s/n and I should have figured it out from there.
I knew CDs were about -96dB s/n and I should have figured it out from there.
-
- KVRian
- 623 posts since 28 Feb, 2011 from Sweden
Now this kind of confusions is why I prefer to see signal levels as multiples rather than decibels!
David Guda gudaaudio.com
-
- Banned
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
perhaps adding fuel to the fire, what i have managed to glean is that you're pretty safe using the pow(10,dB/20) mystran gave..
x = pow(b, y);
b = pow(x, 1 / y);
y = log(x) / log(b);
perhaps the -3dB in RMS is where the confusion comes from, because i, and apparently a lot of other people, have used apps where -3 is used to reduce the signal by half (was this cooledit? been years, i wonder where it came from) before i decided to secure a definition. i believe there are certain groups who make up their own definition of decibels, perhaps changing them routinely to confuse outsiders. old sow got caught in the fence last spring.
x = pow(b, y);
b = pow(x, 1 / y);
y = log(x) / log(b);
perhaps the -3dB in RMS is where the confusion comes from, because i, and apparently a lot of other people, have used apps where -3 is used to reduce the signal by half (was this cooledit? been years, i wonder where it came from) before i decided to secure a definition. i believe there are certain groups who make up their own definition of decibels, perhaps changing them routinely to confuse outsiders. old sow got caught in the fence last spring.
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
